How Many Internal Links Do You Usually Add to a New Article?

I am working on improving my internal linking strategy and noticed that everyone has a different approach. Some people add many internal links, while others only link to the most relevant pages. How do you decide which pages to link when publishing a new article?
Do you follow any specific method or just focus on relevance and user experience?
I don't follow a fixed number. I usually add 5–15 internal links, depending on the article length and how many genuinely relevant pages I have.

My rule is simple: every link should help the reader or strengthen topical relevance. I'd rather add 8 highly relevant links than force 20 just for SEO. Relevance and a strong content cluster matter more than hitting a specific number.
 
Usually I add 3-4 internal links, and 1-2 rilevant external that point to youtube, reddit, wikipedia etc.
 
I usually link only where it makes sense for readers. If an old article can help explain a point better, I add that link.
 
I try to prioritize important pages that I want to strengthen, but I avoid forcing links just for SEO. For me, a few highly relevant internal links placed naturally in the content usually work better than adding a lot of links that don’t provide much value.
 
I stick to strict contextual linking: both ways. The links have to make total sense semantically, topically, and for user experience.

You also have to balance link density with content length. Cramming a short post with a ton of internal links isn't going to do your rankings any favors
 
I focus more towards relevance and search intent rather than volume of links.

I like to topical authority by linking new content to relevant resources while high-quality URLs and using descriptive anchor text to improve crawlability and topical relevance.

Do you measure the success of your internal linking strategy by ranking improvements, crawl depth, or changes in page authority?
 
The most effective internal linking strategy isn't about quantity (many or few), but about structure and context. Prioritize user experience (UX) and relevance over stuffing too many links. On average, a 1,000-1,500 word article only needs 3-5 quality internal links.
 
I just don't add any link randomly.I am following simple approach .

1. internal links should be relevant to the article topic while complementing user & article intent.
2. THere should not be any fixed number.
3. there should not be any fixed internal link number.
 
Usually I add 3-4 internal links
@hollifrin that ratio is a sensible default, and honestly the count is the part I worry about least these days.

What changed it for me was inheriting a site with a pile of orphan pages. I'd always assumed the crawl-budget talk was overblown. Then I linked them properly from pages that already had some standing, and they finally started getting picked up. Nothing else about them changed.

So now I work backwards. Which pages do I actually need to strengthen, and is anything pointing at them yet. The number per article ends up falling out of that instead of being decided up front.

Are yours landing on the same handful of pages each time, or does it spread out across the site?
 
For me, it starts with the search intent of the new article. I usually link to pages that expand on a point, answer a related question, or help the reader continue their journey. I don't try to hit a specific number of internal links because that often leads to unnecessary links. A smaller number of relevant, contextual links has worked better for my sites than linking to every possible page.
 
Back
Top