AI content not being detected: How is it possible?

s666chez

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2024
Messages
112
Reaction score
19
Wrote some content with Claude + Gemini and some insights from my side (mention this and that). It is really good content, I just got it through Originality, Quillbot, Humanize and ZeroGPT and it scored 0 AI on all of them.

I am of course, REALLY skeptical. Would you post this content straight up? Guess Google's AI detectors are better than these so I should still do some changes

Anyway let me know what yall think
 
I think content quality and usefulness matter more than AI detection scores real user feedback and performance are probably better indicators over time
 
I think content quality and usefulness matter more than AI detection scores real user feedback and performance are probably better indicators over time
content is still really good!
 
A 0% AI score is nice, but I still wouldn't trust the detectors completely. If the content is genuinely helpful and you've added your own insights, you're probably in a much better position.
 
Google don't care about the ai content or quality of content it cares about the meat and potatoes of the content.
Are you fulfilling the user intent or not and things like that.
By passing through all those ai generators and modifiers your content gets messed up. You day it's really good may be it is may be not next time.
Use just 1 ai content writer or generator and focus on meat and potatoes of the content.
 
I think the key is to focus on content quality; whether or not it is AI-generated doesn't significantly impact the core value, provided you meet user needs and keep them engaged with your content. However, relying too heavily on AI isn't ideal you can always edit AI-generated content to better suit your preferences.
 
insights from my side (mention this and that)
Do you mean you gave your insights to the AI while prompting, or you added them by editing the content afterwards manually? If the former, then that is really impressive it still managed to pass with a 0 score.

If it was me, I would still make some small manual changes just to be sure befor posting
 
ai detection tools are not always reliable so i would not depend on those scores alone. i would review the content for accuracy, add personal experience and make sure it genuinely helps the reader before publishing.
But it is possible that Google has enough data about how to detect AI content and this also affects their ranking.
 
If you added your own insights and structured it well, it makes sense why it bypasses third-party detectors. However, you should still manually review and polish it before posting. Google does not look for specific AI footprints like these detectors do; they focus entirely on whether the content provides real, helpful value and satisfies user intent. :)
 
Wrote some content with Claude + Gemini and some insights from my side (mention this and that). It is really good content, I just got it through Originality, Quillbot, Humanize and ZeroGPT and it scored 0 AI on all of them.

I am of course, REALLY skeptical. Would you post this content straight up? Guess Google's AI detectors are better than these so I should still do some changes

Anyway let me know what yall think
Of course i would not release it without editiing but that would have nothing to do with the score given by the AI. that technology is more about guessing than analyzing properly. i would take a single round of editing where i would injject my voice nd insights. the machine is good at providing the foundation but those details give an edge to the content.
 
Those AI detectors are not really reliable, so I wouldn’t trust a 0 score too much. If the content is actually useful and has your own insights, I’d publish it but still add some personal examples and edits to make it unique.
 
I would still read and edit it before publishing. AI detection tools often give different results, so I would not trust a 0% score alone. I think the best approach is to make sure the content is accurate, useful, and includes your own ideas and experience.
 
In this case, I will not rely on AI detection scores. If my content is accurate, usefl and reflects your own expertise, I will review it and refine it before publishing instead of focusing on whether it scores as AI orr human.
 
Wrote some content with Claude + Gemini and some insights from my side (mention this and that). It is really good content, I just got it through Originality, Quillbot, Humanize and ZeroGPT and it scored 0 AI on all of them.

I am of course, REALLY skeptical. Would you post this content straight up? Guess Google's AI detectors are better than these so I should still do some changes

Anyway let me know what yall think
people focus to much on AI score, but the real value comes from unique insights, accuracy, nd useful information that add something beyond simple AI-generated rephrasing.
 
Honestly, I wouldn't stress too much about what the detectors say most of those tools are notoriously unreliable anyway. The fact that you added your own human insights and guided the output is what actually matters here. Google has explicitly stated that they don't penalize AI content just for being AI; they penalize unhelpful, spammy content. If the article reads well, provides real value to the user, and matches the search intent, I'd say give it a final manual read-through to ensure the tone is natural, and then go ahead and publish it straight up.
 
Back
Top