Lavender_Strings
Junior Member
- Mar 11, 2023
- 115
- 66
Hi everyone,
As organic traffic is fragmented, i've been working on improving my site's llm viisbility. Would like to understand what's actually working with llms visibility, especially in highly competitive markets like saas, martech and edtech.
One thing I've noticed is that some agencies now claim they can improve your ai visibility within 3-6 months. But when I ask what their strategy is, the answers are usually the same things that are already being discussed everywhere like structured content, schema, llms.txt, ai-friendly content, etc. We've already been implementing many of these ourselves.
At the same time, when I look at AI responses, I keep seeing the same well-established brands getting mentioned and cited. Most of them have spent years building their reputation through PR, software review sites, analyst reports, community discussions, reddit, podcasts, media coverage, etc. So I'm wondering what the ground reality is.
Want to know about:
- In highly competitive markets, can a company with relatively little historical PR and brand authority realistically improve its AI visibility just by implementing aeo/geo today?
- has anyone actually seen aeo/geo produce meaningful traffic (in highly competitive market)? if so, how long did it take?
- since llms don't always include clickable links, are ai mentions translating into meaningful traffic or are they mainly improving brand awareness?
- what content strategy works for you to bring in llms traffic? (I feel blogs are now to build authority around the niche and not to generate traffic)
- are there any other channel (apart from ads as they've also become highly crowded) that can bring traffic?
I'm not looking for a universal answer because I understand every niche is different. I'd just like to hear from people who are actively working in competitive industries like saas and have real-world experience.
Thanks in advance
As organic traffic is fragmented, i've been working on improving my site's llm viisbility. Would like to understand what's actually working with llms visibility, especially in highly competitive markets like saas, martech and edtech.
One thing I've noticed is that some agencies now claim they can improve your ai visibility within 3-6 months. But when I ask what their strategy is, the answers are usually the same things that are already being discussed everywhere like structured content, schema, llms.txt, ai-friendly content, etc. We've already been implementing many of these ourselves.
At the same time, when I look at AI responses, I keep seeing the same well-established brands getting mentioned and cited. Most of them have spent years building their reputation through PR, software review sites, analyst reports, community discussions, reddit, podcasts, media coverage, etc. So I'm wondering what the ground reality is.
Want to know about:
- In highly competitive markets, can a company with relatively little historical PR and brand authority realistically improve its AI visibility just by implementing aeo/geo today?
- has anyone actually seen aeo/geo produce meaningful traffic (in highly competitive market)? if so, how long did it take?
- since llms don't always include clickable links, are ai mentions translating into meaningful traffic or are they mainly improving brand awareness?
- what content strategy works for you to bring in llms traffic? (I feel blogs are now to build authority around the niche and not to generate traffic)
- are there any other channel (apart from ads as they've also become highly crowded) that can bring traffic?
I'm not looking for a universal answer because I understand every niche is different. I'd just like to hear from people who are actively working in competitive industries like saas and have real-world experience.
Thanks in advance
