Read an ai article 3 times, then close it write in your own words, with your own voice. When it comes to chasing down factual knoweldge I think which is the only thing tht seperates ai from a human at any given time, content wise, is the ability to use our own style of langauge, and collected facts, to seperate us, and give us the ability to be exceptional writers.
Conclusions and research perspectives can always be newer than ai is writing, as this is real time, your perspective. YOu might think ai is smart. But it couldn't write with the diversity EVER for millions of years, ALL the people on the planet, putting their own life and knoweldge into a article.
Humans are inheritnely more intersting than bots and ai, and the people that make themselves as human as possible along with their attitute, and writing will do good, in this ai backlash generation that is growing up.
Being able to know when and where to use ai is the key. I try to stick to something now, like first touch. Never let ai be the first thing that your client sees, make it the tool that helps you deliver a result. (maybe prompting if you write an article the "top 20 facts about eiffel tower", "the top 5 musems", "top 3 parks". "best leisure funpark in france".) putting them all togheter into your research lists first.
then READING those and just writing up brief notes on your document about what you learned. Then expanding the content, and filling it with your voice, and tightening up the factual parts. It might take longer but it still is quicker and more comprehensive, and unique and interesting for your readers if you write like this compared to "hey chatgpt write me a final article on things to do in france during the heatwave, make no mistake, deep research, go to moon. Now write me 1000 articles all about france, and everything related!" lol