Who do you prefer Do-Follow or No-Follow backlinks ?

I prefer no-follow backlink for high-authority. It will drive quality traffic, build credibility, and naturally lead to more valuable backlink opportunities.
 
I'd rather have a relevant do follow link from a decent site than a random high authority no follow link relevance usually wins
 
who do you prefer Do-Follow backlinks but Low Authority site?
or
No-Follow backlinks but high Authority sites?
I prefer no-follow backlink for high-authority. It will drive quality traffic, build credibility, and naturally lead to more valuable backlink opportunities.
I'd rather have a relevant do follow link from a decent site than a random high authority no follow link relevance usually wins

Why are you all looking like brethren?
 
Of course if you want to do it for SEO - you need only ******** links. You can buid 5-10% nofollow just to keep your profile cool.
 
i prefer niche relevant links. it doesn't matter if they are do-follow or no-follow high authority or low authority


do-follow links pass link juice
no-follow links don't pass it
for a natural backlink profile, both are equally important.
 
Last edited:
I would take the high authority nofollow if the site is real and relevant. I have seen those links send traffic and help build trust even without direct link juice. Best setup is still a natural mix instead of chasing only ******** metrics.
 
I would choose a relevant high authority site over a low quality Do-follow link any day
 
I choose the links that compliments my site niche. Not just a random backlinks. Except this, everything is secondary..
 
For me relevance is the deciding factor I have seen people obsess over ******** links and metrics while completely ignoring whether the site makes sense for their niche.
 
who do you prefer Do-Follow backlinks but Low Authority site?
or
No-Follow backlinks but high Authority sites?
It is not about do-follow or no-follow links if you choose that sites which have high authority and people engagement is high and they explore the things related to your niche. If you placed your link there and people noticed that and comes to your site than no matter it is do-follow or no-follow.
 
I'd choose relevance over just the follow attribute. A nofollow link from a trusted, relevant website can still bring valuable traffic and credibility. Building a natural mix of quality links has worked better for me than focusing only on ******** links.
 
who do you prefer Do-Follow backlinks but Low Authority site?
or
No-Follow backlinks but high Authority sites?
Most times relevance outweighs authority. relevance is beter than authority regardles of the size of the domain for the reaon that a link which is relevant will match what the user is loking for and the topic as well.
 
I usually prefer high authority No-Follow links over low quality Do-Follow ones, because trust and traffic matter more than just link type.
 
I do not look at them seperately anymore. A natural mix has worked better for me than chasing only ******** links. If a link comes from a relevant, trusted site and sends real visitor then i still see value in it regardless of the attribute.
 
I'd take the relevant high authority mention even if it's nofollow. A natural backlink profile is always better than chasing only ******** links.
 
choose a relevant Do-Follow backlink even from a lower authority site if it's genuine and fits the niche Relevance and natural placement usually matter more than authority alone.
 
I prefer high authority no follow link which is better than low authority reason is ( Trust and visibility are harder to fake link attributes )
 
Back
Top