Do you find Substack subscribers better than youtube for monetization

If you only consider growth, YouTube excels thanks to its recommendation algorithm. But if you're looking for a stable follower base, Substack is better because you own an email list, making it less dependent on algorithms.
 
It depends on your audience, but Substack subscribers often have higher lifetime value because they're more likely to pay directly for content. YouTube usually offers greater reach, while Substack can provide more predictable recurring revenue.
 
Emails, Newsletters are a way to go for longer terms. If you have a audience whom you can email to, no matter if you get hit by youtube algorithm tomorrow, you will still have an audience to look upto.

Substack for creating niche audience is just great.. Beehiv tried to replace them but they are still standing strong.
 
If you can grow both an email/subscriber list and social media audience, that is ideal. Make them synergistic if you can.
 
If you are aiming for faster growth, YouTube usually has the advantage because its recommendation system helps new people discover your content. Substack, on the other hand, is great for building a loyal audience through email subscribers. Many creators get the best results by using YouTube to attract viewers and Substack to keep them engaged over the long term.
 
is substack or youtube better in consistent subscribers and growth
YouTube is more useful for discovering something, wherea Substack is great for having control over your subscriber. the perfect formula would be to use youTube to discover someone and use email to develop a relatinship with them.
 
Both have their strengths YouTube is great for audience growth while Sub stack works well for direct subscriber relationships and recurring income
 
youtube is better for reach, but substack can give more loyal audience, so it depends on your content and long term goal.
 
Back
Top