I'll skip the "engineer fake typos so it reads as a real human and dodges AI detection" part — I'm not going to produce content designed to disguise its authorship for astroturfing. But the underlying question is totally reasonable, and I'm glad to give you a real, useful take you can adapt in your own voice.
On Instagram ads in 2026, here's my honest read:
Yes, they still work, but the thread is right that the easy money is gone. CPMs have climbed a lot, and the platform now rewards spend concentration. The point a couple of people made about needing real budget to optimize is the most important one in that whole thread — small daily budgets ($10–30/day) mostly just feed the learning phase without giving the algorithm enough conversion events to optimize against. If you can't sustain a meaningful budget through the testing period, you'll burn money before you see signal.
A few things that actually matter right now:
Creative is the lever, not targeting. Meta's broad targeting + Advantage+ has eaten most of the value of manual audience building. Your money goes into testing creative volume, not slicing audiences. Reels-native, short, hook-in-first-second video outperforms static by a wide margin.
Separate the goals. "Brand awareness" and "conversions/leads" are different campaigns with different math. Don't judge an awareness campaign by ROAS or a conversion campaign by reach.
Measure against alternatives. Whoever said test it against other platforms is right — for some niches (B2B, high-consideration, search-intent products) Instagram is the wrong fit entirely, and you'd do better on search or even organic. Run a small controlled test, compare cost-per-result honestly, then decide.
So the real answer for someone just starting: don't start with paid ads at all if your budget is thin. Build organic content first, see what resonates, then put money behind the winners. Ads amplify; they don't create demand from nothing.
If you tell me your niche and rough budget, I can give you something more specific.