Demon Slayer.
Registered Member
- May 26, 2026
- 76
- 14
I have been working with Telegram Ads for quite time, managing campaigns across different niches, and recently I have noticed something interesting.
Around 2024-2025, Telegram Mini Apps felt like the next big thing. Every week there seemed to be a new launch, whether it was a game, Web3 project, rewards platform, utility tool, or some kind of viral Mini App. Traffic networks and advertisers were heavily promoting them, and many media buyers were shifting budgets toward Mini App user acquisition.
I remember seeing a lot of discussion around networks such as PropellerAds and other traffic sources that were delivering strong volumes for Mini Apps. Many advertisers were reporting impressive engagement metrics compared to traditional advertising channels.
Fast forward to 2026, and the conversation seems very different.
Telegram itself continues to grow, and I'm actually seeing more demand than ever for traditional Telegram Ads. Most of the clients I speak with today are focused on:
Growing Telegram channels
Acquiring subscribers
Driving users to bots
Building communities
Promoting SaaS products
Lead generation campaigns
E-commerce and affiliate offers
But when it comes to Mini Apps, things seem much quieter.
I'm not saying Mini Apps are dead. In fact, some reports still suggest huge impression volumes across the Mini App ecosystem. However, compared to the amount of hype and discussion we saw previously, it feels like advertiser attention has shifted significantly.
My personal theory is that several things happened:
1. The hype cycle ended
Many projects launched because Mini Apps were trending. Once the initial excitement disappeared, only the products with real user retention survived.
2. Advertisers became more ROI-focused
A lot of Mini App campaigns generated installs and users, but not always long-term value. Businesses today seem much more focused on measurable conversions and customer acquisition costs.
3. Telegram Ads matured
Telegram Ads have become easier to scale and understand. For many businesses, promoting a channel, community, or bot is more straightforward than building and monetizing a Mini App.
4. Competition increased
As more Mini Apps entered the ecosystem, user attention became fragmented. Getting users is one thing; keeping them engaged is another challenge entirely.
5. Only certain niches still thrive
My guess is that gaming, rewards, finance, and utility-based Mini Apps are still doing well, while many other categories have struggled to maintain momentum.
What I'm seeing today is that Telegram Ads are becoming a serious acquisition channel for businesses, while Mini Apps seem to have moved from a hype-driven market to a more mature and competitive one.
For those actively buying traffic, building Mini Apps, or managing Telegram campaigns:
Are Mini Apps still producing strong ROI for you?
Have you reduced your Mini App ad spend over the last year?
Which niches are still performing well?
Do you believe traditional Telegram Ads now offer a better opportunity than Mini App advertising?
I would be interested to hear real experiences from people currently spending budgets in both areas.
Around 2024-2025, Telegram Mini Apps felt like the next big thing. Every week there seemed to be a new launch, whether it was a game, Web3 project, rewards platform, utility tool, or some kind of viral Mini App. Traffic networks and advertisers were heavily promoting them, and many media buyers were shifting budgets toward Mini App user acquisition.
I remember seeing a lot of discussion around networks such as PropellerAds and other traffic sources that were delivering strong volumes for Mini Apps. Many advertisers were reporting impressive engagement metrics compared to traditional advertising channels.
Fast forward to 2026, and the conversation seems very different.
Telegram itself continues to grow, and I'm actually seeing more demand than ever for traditional Telegram Ads. Most of the clients I speak with today are focused on:
Growing Telegram channels
Acquiring subscribers
Driving users to bots
Building communities
Promoting SaaS products
Lead generation campaigns
E-commerce and affiliate offers
But when it comes to Mini Apps, things seem much quieter.
I'm not saying Mini Apps are dead. In fact, some reports still suggest huge impression volumes across the Mini App ecosystem. However, compared to the amount of hype and discussion we saw previously, it feels like advertiser attention has shifted significantly.
My personal theory is that several things happened:
1. The hype cycle ended
Many projects launched because Mini Apps were trending. Once the initial excitement disappeared, only the products with real user retention survived.
2. Advertisers became more ROI-focused
A lot of Mini App campaigns generated installs and users, but not always long-term value. Businesses today seem much more focused on measurable conversions and customer acquisition costs.
3. Telegram Ads matured
Telegram Ads have become easier to scale and understand. For many businesses, promoting a channel, community, or bot is more straightforward than building and monetizing a Mini App.
4. Competition increased
As more Mini Apps entered the ecosystem, user attention became fragmented. Getting users is one thing; keeping them engaged is another challenge entirely.
5. Only certain niches still thrive
My guess is that gaming, rewards, finance, and utility-based Mini Apps are still doing well, while many other categories have struggled to maintain momentum.
What I'm seeing today is that Telegram Ads are becoming a serious acquisition channel for businesses, while Mini Apps seem to have moved from a hype-driven market to a more mature and competitive one.
For those actively buying traffic, building Mini Apps, or managing Telegram campaigns:
Are Mini Apps still producing strong ROI for you?
Have you reduced your Mini App ad spend over the last year?
Which niches are still performing well?
Do you believe traditional Telegram Ads now offer a better opportunity than Mini App advertising?
I would be interested to hear real experiences from people currently spending budgets in both areas.