AI content test
- Thread starter jaber10
- Start date
- Sep 8, 2015
- 5,598
- 5,424
You mean pure AI without human edits?
How long it's been?
I find biggest problem with AI is that us treats every topic the same.
Word count, headings structure, formatting.
That's not what humans do and not every topic should get the same treatment.
How long it's been?
I find biggest problem with AI is that us treats every topic the same.
Word count, headings structure, formatting.
That's not what humans do and not every topic should get the same treatment.
BhplatinumUK
Newbie
- Jun 2, 2026
- 13
- 5
Unless you're prompting AI heavily with it's content generation, you'll get slop. Think of AI as the tool to speed things up, but not the solution to the quality
- Oct 28, 2020
- 11,663
- 14,635
so, unless you give the "uber intelligent" AI 500 words of text so it can spit out 300 words back, right?
Wondering who's working for who in this case...
Sonu soomro123
Newbie
- Dec 2, 2024
- 46
- 8
How long it's been
OverthinkingCat
Registered Member
- Feb 18, 2026
- 63
- 12
i tried it on my niche site traffic spiked at first but then google hit it hard in the next update so be carefull bro.
- Aug 16, 2014
- 3,089
- 676
I have experimented with AI written content on one of my smaller blogs. Some articles have brought in decent traffic, while others have not performed as well as expected. The results seem inconsistent, so I'm curious to know how others are using AI content and whether they were seen better success with certain approaches.
QueenOfHell
Newbie
- Mar 30, 2026
- 31
- 8
Some bloggers report initial indexing but weak rankings, which usually improves after updating and enriching the content.
- Aug 30, 2021
- 110
- 28
Prompt is what really matters in your case. You might get either slop or normal quality content - it's all about prompt
- Mar 2, 2021
- 4,040
- 1,181
I’ve seen similar results on small blogs, AI content can work, but it usually needs a bit of human editing to really perform well. You might get better consistency by improving structure, adding personal angle, and refreshing older posts instead of relying fully on raw output.
- Apr 17, 2026
- 190
- 35
AI can be useful for drafts, but I get better results when I review and personalize the content before publishing. A little editing goes a long way.
- Nov 16, 2011
- 19,789
- 11,280
Do not have high hopes. In long term, AI content will not give very good results.
Fox_on_leafe
Newbie
- Jun 11, 2026
- 20
- 0
If you ever get tired of that stiff AI tone, try throwing in some of your own voice and little stories - Google seems to eat that up these days. I mix up short and long posts and it keeps traffic a bit less bumpy. Setting the AI to spit out bullet points instead of walls of text makes editing way quicker on my end.
doodlequest
Newbie
- Jun 27, 2026
- 16
- 7
I had such an experience as well. AI can be quite usefful for producing a first draft to save ur time but the end product largely depends on how much you will perfect it. When u use ur examples nd add ur personal insights nd edits to improve readability the conttent turns out much more organic and effective.
chibitrail
Newbie
- Jun 29, 2026
- 26
- 2
I have had similar results. AI has been a great productivity tool but I do not think it is a shortcut to better rankings. The articles that performed best were the ones I treated as a starting point adding original research, improving the structure nd making the content more usefful. In my experience that extra effort makes a noticeable difference.
I have also witnessed varying results from AI written content. Although it can aid in the speedy completion of content creattion the posts which tend to do well have some level of humaniization to them in addition to proper optimization. AI alone is not enough to make ur blog outstanding.
