Let's join in creating a community token

Status
Not open for further replies.
My idea is that the core is a group of a dozen or more service providers, could be anything from SEO, content and copy to hosting ..... Each of the core owners offer a discount to those that pay with the token.

I UNDERSTAND its light, and optimistic. BUT this creates some buy pressure.

Maybe we can add some memefication. Anything. I'm not expecting it to reach Ether's market cap, but I think it can reach light traction, and requires not much.

What do ya'll think?
Are you planning to launch a meme coin pump.fun or somewhere else?

Did you already created groups if yes then do they are present ?
 
This concept involves the creation of a group of service providers, and the purpose of this thread was to see if this can get traction here. So far only 1 person shown real interest in this idea.


A second point. I'm interested and OPEN to ANY form of token project, from real usage to memes. I have experience, access to fund(limited of course) but I most definitely can't do everything by my self.
 
This concept involves the creation of a group of service providers, and the purpose of this thread was to see if this can get traction here. So far only 1 person shown real interest in this idea.


A second point. I'm interested and OPEN to ANY form of token project, from real usage to memes. I have experience, access to found (limited of course) but I most definitely can't do everything by my self.
I would like to know your full plan as i am a crypto/forex enthusiast so can we do something great together

I am also open for some good ideas to create community or create token etc.
 
I would like to know your full plan as i am a crypto/forex enthusiast so can we do something great together

I am also open for some good ideas to create community or create token etc.
I'd be very happy to connect.
I will DM you later with more info.
 
Interesting idea. The real strength isn’t the token, but the community behind it. If it’s used for real things like discounts, services, or member rewards, it could have more value than most random crypto projects.
The least concern is the launch token. The question is how willing the other members would be to invest real money in something so risky. Also, always token holders or those who received tokens for free (airdrop) will immediately sell them at the first opportunity, which most often devastates its value.
I have seen a lot of crypto casinos that have launched their own token for their needs, such as rewarding users, sharing various bonuses and the like... They had everything, a solid community, gambling-minded, those who love risk, enough equity capital, and an already built brand, but few can be said to be successful. And that is questionable too.
 
Sounds interesting. I think the success of the project will depend on having a real utility and a strong community behind it. If you have a more detailed plan, I'd be interested in hearing more.
 
The airdrop dump pattern is one of the most predictable charts in crypto. Across more than 200 campaigns we have run growth on, free recipients liquidate at the first listing, the price collapses 60 to 80 percent, then the project spends two quarters trying to rebuild a holder base.
The teams that beat the pattern share a few things:
Vesting on every free allocation. Even small cliffs (30 day, 90 day) filter out the worst flippers. Snapshot eligibility based on actual on chain activity over 60 days, not just a wallet existing. Bot farms cost real money to keep alive that long, so you raise the floor without raising the cost for real users.
Utility live before the listing. The strongest community tokens we worked with had non token usage already running (loyalty points, in app credits, off chain rewards). When the token launched, holders had an existing reason to keep the asset rather than swap it for a stable.
Limited free supply. Airdropping less than 10 percent of total supply, and pricing the rest into a public sale or LP, narrows the dump window. A 30 percent free allocation with no vesting is structurally a sell side machine.
On a community token launch we ran (PokerDAO), gating the airdrop to wallets with 30 or more on chain plays kept the early holder base in real players. Six months later most of those wallets were still holding.
Crypto casinos are a harder structure. Gambling buyers want EV in stables, not in volatile assets. Loyalty rebates and revenue share tokens work better in that vertical than equity style tokens.
 
Interesting idea. A BHW-based ecosystem could work if the focus is real utility first — services, tools, discounts, networking — and not just another hype token.
 
Not a bad idea, comes down to sincerity of purpose and team work, it has potentials.


The airdrop dump pattern is one of the most predictable charts in crypto. Across more than 200 campaigns we have run growth on, free recipients liquidate at the first listing, the price collapses 60 to 80 percent, then the project spends two quarters trying to rebuild a holder base.
The teams that beat the pattern share a few things:
Vesting on every free allocation. Even small cliffs (30 day, 90 day) filter out the worst flippers. Snapshot eligibility based on actual on chain activity over 60 days, not just a wallet existing. Bot farms cost real money to keep alive that long, so you raise the floor without raising the cost for real users.
Utility live before the listing. The strongest community tokens we worked with had non token usage already running (loyalty points, in app credits, off chain rewards). When the token launched, holders had an existing reason to keep the asset rather than swap it for a stable.
Limited free supply. Airdropping less than 10 percent of total supply, and pricing the rest into a public sale or LP, narrows the dump window. A 30 percent free allocation with no vesting is structurally a sell side machine.
On a community token launch we ran (PokerDAO), gating the airdrop to wallets with 30 or more on chain plays kept the early holder base in real players. Six months later most of those wallets were still holding.
Crypto casinos are a harder structure. Gambling buyers want EV in stables, not in volatile assets. Loyalty rebates and revenue share tokens work better in that vertical than equity style tokens.
This is solid advice
 
First of all let me explain once more what I mean with an oversimplified example:


we group 15, 20, 50 sellers, service providers all members of BHW (FOUNDERS, HATTERS ...) and we issue the XYXY Token. when a buyer reaches out to one of the FOUNDERS and says he wants to get 3 months of SEO for his blog (assume that specific founder offers SEO).., he the buyer gets 10% discount if pays with the XYXY Token.

We maintain iron fist control of the minting and supply. Not centralized, but minted on batches.

There are more creative solutions of course.

But basically it offers us a great upside if you do the math.


To repeat, the example I shared is a over-over-simplified example, but it illustrates the concept.



Interesting idea. The real strength isn’t the token, but the community behind it. If it’s used for real things like discounts, services, or member rewards, it could have more value than most random crypto projects.

Yes. Well said. PRECISELY!!!!!
The least concern is the launch token. The question is how willing the other members would be to invest real money in something so risky. Also, always token holders or those who received tokens for free (airdrop) will immediately sell them at the first opportunity, which most often devastates its value.
I have seen a lot of crypto casinos that have launched their own token for their needs, such as rewarding users, sharing various bonuses and the like... They had everything, a solid community, gambling-minded, those who love risk, enough equity capital, and an already built brand, but few can be said to be successful. And that is questionable too.

NOT sure what you mean by <invest> ?
There are some basis, and some more creative ways to protect the volume and PTV from being bashed.

BUT I agree with your statement about crypto casnos, and their failed token launches... seen many like that and despite expecting them to work, they didnt.

My idea is that there's minimal expense, almost pennies per FOUNDER, but the upside is there, its NOT GUARATEED, nothing is, but there's some foundation to the idea.



Sounds interesting. I think the success of the project will depend on having a real utility and a strong community behind it. If you have a more detailed plan, I'd be interested in hearing more.
Yes.
See above.

Interesting idea. A BHW-based ecosystem could work if the focus is real utility first — services, tools, discounts, networking — and not just another hype token.
Yes !!!!

I'm not the only optimist here Im glad to see
 
We're closing this thread.

While we absolutely applaud the community coming together and joining forces on an idea or project, we're uncomfortable with having BHW's name attributed to a project, either officially or unofficially, that invoves something as volatile and potentially problematic as cryptocurrency.

If you have an issue with our decision, please contact our Support team - https://support.blackhatworld.com/support/home
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top