Anyone here working heavily with anti-detect browsers?

DonMorriz · May 14, 2026

vierasen said:
For my own work GoLogin if budget matters, Dolphin Anty if I need iOS/mobile fingerprints done properly. Both handle the Chromium-process-per-profile thing reasonably well up to ~80 profiles on a 32GB box. Multilogin is technically still best but the price stopped making sense in 2024. Anything "newer" like Undetectable or Lalicat — fine for under 20 profiles, falls apart past that.

I tried dolphin anty and other anti decet on this site demo.fingerprint.com/playground and they got detected, trust score like 8 points even Octobrowser

trang836 · May 20, 2026

Scaling is exactly where most tools fall apart due to session lag and crossed cookies. For our multi-user workflows, we switched to https://hidemium.io. The profile data isolation remains rock solid at scale, and its proxy pre-check completely prevents WebRTC or location leaks

emporio99 · May 20, 2026

Another Chromium-based browser promising the moon but probably just serving up a half-baked fingerprint spoofing solution. I guess we'll wait and see if their "closed beta" actually delivers anything beyond the usual broken promises and a hefty price tag

qandeelfahad1 · May 20, 2026

They're basically saying a lot of the tools out there seem good on the surface, but fall apart when you actually try to use them for real stuff, which is totally understandable

vierasen · May 23, 2026

fingerprint.com playground specifically detects via TLS/JA3 fingerprint + canvas entropy mismatch + a few proprietary signals — almost no consumer antidetect passes it because they all spoof at the JS layer, not the network layer. That's not the right benchmark for actual platform detection though — Meta/TikTok/Google use much weaker signals (mostly UA + canvas + WebGL + battery API). Test against creepjs and pixelscan instead, those mirror real-world platform detection. Trust score 8 on fingerprint.com is fine for FB/IG, useless for stripe/banking antifraud.

lingfan · Jul 20, 2026

alexander_ander said:
Hi everyone

Anyone here working heavily with anti-detect browsers?

Curious how people currently feel about existing solutions — especially around fingerprint spoofing, automation, profile isolation, team workflows, etc.

Lately I’ve been spending a lot of time comparing different antidetect setups while working on our own Chromium-based anti-detect browser for affiliate/crypto workflows, and honestly it feels like many tools look solid feature-wise until you start scaling or using them in more complex setups.

Speaking of the basics — fingerprint spoofing seems to exist, but sometimes it’s just a button in the interface with no actual spoofing happening.

Take, for example, AudioContext in one of the popular anti-detect browsers: at the Chromium (browser) level, there’s no spoofing — and this is easy to verify on checker sites pretty quickly.

We’re currently preparing a closed beta and mainly looking to connect with people who actively use antidetects in real workflows and can provide solid feedback from actual day-to-day usage.

Would be interesting to hear what tools people here actually rely on daily and what limitations still annoy you the most.

For team workflows, the biggest challenge is profile synchronization and cookie pollution. If multiple team members access the same profile without strict concurrency locks, the session tokens get invalidated instantly. Cloud-based anti-detect browsers with local proxy binding solved a lot of this for us.

mentalitysquirell · Jul 20, 2026

My biggest annoyance is how poorly most tools handle automation at scale without leaking subtle hardware discrepancies that instantly trigger modern verification systems.

Anyone here working heavily with anti-detect browsers?

DonMorriz

Registered Member

trang836

Newbie

emporio99

BANNED

qandeelfahad1

Registered Member

vierasen

Regular Member

lingfan

Newbie

mentalitysquirell

Newbie

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World