- May 13, 2026
- 111
- 14
Now DA does not matter. best traffic is very important in website. google focus on relevance traffic and Quality content.
don't think so, even lately sometimes you get lucky and one Sarkar pack or similar can get your site to rank no. 1-3, idk how it still works, but it doesI think its very sad that newbies dont know the BHW platform is solely build to facilitate backlinksellers to trick newbies in fake stories about value of backlinks. In reality backlinks are not part of the Google-algo at all.
Your thinking does not influence the algo.don't think so, even lately sometimes you get lucky and one Sarkar pack or similar can get your site to rank no. 1-3, idk how it still works, but it does![]()
No, you are wrong.
- DA metrics alone are no longer enough to improve rankings. Relevant niche backlinks and contextual placements now carry greater SEO value for sustainable growth.
- Search engines prioritize topical relevance more than high authority scores. Contextual links from industry-related websites usually generate stronger long-term ranking signals.
- Building niche-specific backlinks is more effective today than focusing only on domain authority. Relevant placements help improve trust, visibility, and organic performance.
Interesting, but another form of bias. Its about the good story thats recognized by your visitors. Not about the backlink.Think of links as money
If your site suddenly has a high DA link pointing to it, no plausible reason for it, google will just consider it money laundering and will discard it
It's not about links themselves, it's about history. How did you get the links? What is the intent? Where did the link come from? Do people see it?
If you got a good story for all those questions, then yes a high DA link will pass a lot of juice. Otherwise it'll be ignored and busted just like money laundering
You can't cut authority out as a ranking factor. Therefore, backlink quality will always matter, and authority metrics indicators like DA/DR/AS/TF will always matter. The issue of how reliable they are, is a different matter.No, you are wrong.
As Googles knows 98% of backlinks are created to manipulate their algo, they cut it out of the algo a long time ago.
Or do you (like lots of BHW members) really think they build systems to detect the 98% and you are able to fool these systems again. So you are smart and Google is stupid? Yeah, right.
I cant cut it out?You can't cut authority out as a ranking factor. Therefore, backlink quality will always matter, and authority metrics indicators like DA/DR/AS/TF will always matter. The issue of how reliable they are, is a different matter.
High-DA backlinks can make a difference, but the impact is often exaggerated. The key thing to understand is that Google does not use third-party metrics like “DA” directly in rankings. DA is just an SEO industry estimate of a site’s overall link strength.Hey everyone,
People often sell high DA backlinks, but I am unsure how much they actually impact rankings today.
Is domain authority alone enough, or does relevance matter more? Has anyone seen real ranking improvements from high DA links, or are contextual, niche-relevant backlinks more effective in the long run?
High DA backlinks do work but relevance is what matters more. If you can get some bscklinks from relevant high authority websites your SEO will improve significantly.Hey everyone,
People often sell high DA backlinks, but I am unsure how much they actually impact rankings today.
Is domain authority alone enough, or does relevance matter more? Has anyone seen real ranking improvements from high DA links, or are contextual, niche-relevant backlinks more effective in the long run?
DA alone means very little now. A relevant link from a smaller real-traffic site usually moves rankings more than a random high-DA placement. Context + trust > metrics.Hey everyone,
People often sell high DA backlinks, but I am unsure how much they actually impact rankings today.
Is domain authority alone enough, or does relevance matter more? Has anyone seen real ranking improvements from high DA links, or are contextual, niche-relevant backlinks more effective in the long run?
Yes, you are right. When people click on a backlink, they go to your site!I’d say they can make a difference, but not in the way people usually assume.
Interesting, but another form of bias. Its about the good story thats recognized by your visitors. Not about the backlink.
High DA links can still help, but I don't think DA alone means as much as people used to think. I've seen more consistent movement from relevant links on smaller niche sites than random high-metric placements.Hey everyone,
People often sell high DA backlinks, but I am unsure how much they actually impact rankings today.
Is domain authority alone enough, or does relevance matter more? Has anyone seen real ranking improvements from high DA links, or are contextual, niche-relevant backlinks more effective in the long run?
In my experience, DA alone is not enough now. High DA links can help, but niche relevance and contextual placement give better long-term ranking results. I’ve seen lower DA, but relevant backlinks perform better than random high DA links.Hey everyone,
People often sell high DA backlinks, but I am unsure how much they actually impact rankings today.
Is domain authority alone enough, or does relevance matter more? Has anyone seen real ranking improvements from high DA links, or are contextual, niche-relevant backlinks more effective in the long run?