Anyone here working heavily with anti-detect browsers?

A

alexgera

Newbie
Joined
Oct 6, 2025
Messages
4
Reaction score
5
Hi everyone

Anyone here working heavily with anti-detect browsers?

Curious how satisfied you are with current solutions — especially when it comes to fingerprint spoofing, team workflows, automation, etc.

We’re currently building our own Chromium-based antidetect browser for affiliate/crypto use cases and looking for people with real volume to test it on actual workflows.

Our main focus is not just adding features, but implementing them properly — because a lot of tools seem to have everything on paper, but in practice things still work inconsistently.

For early testers, we’ll provide extended limits (including profiles) and full access to all features.

If anyone’s interested in testing it and sharing feedback, feel free to DM me here.
 
Advertise on BHW
I am working with anti detect browser everyday. I am paying 11$ per month.
My main requirement is ease of use and price. I would prefer 5$ range with the same ease of use I an getting.
Automation and all other bells and whistles are secondary factor.
 
From experience, the biggest gaps are in fingerprint realism and session stability over time.
Many browsers can spoof fingerprints, but fail when platforms track behavior patterns or anomalies.
Team workflows and sync issues are also a major pain point at scale.
 
Black Ad said:
From experience, the biggest gaps are in fingerprint realism and session stability over time.
Many browsers can spoof fingerprints, but fail when platforms track behavior patterns or anomalies.
Team workflows and sync issues are also a major pain point at scale.
Click to expand...
do agree with you. I guess you`re working with a team in anti-detects? What are the most annoying issues you have while working in a team workflow?
 
alexgera said:
do agree with you. I guess you`re working with a team in anti-detects? What are the most annoying issues you have while working in a team workflow?
Click to expand...
At scale, the real problems aren’t features, they’re coordination and consistency.
Things like profile corruption, session drops, and inconsistent fingerprints between team members happen more often than they should.
Another big issue is poor permission control, too many tools don’t properly separate roles or track actions.
What teams really need is stable syncing, clear activity logs, and environments that behave identically no matter who is using them.
 
Black Ad said:
At scale, the real problems aren’t features, they’re coordination and consistency.
Things like profile corruption, session drops, and inconsistent fingerprints between team members happen more often than they should.
Another big issue is poor permission control, too many tools don’t properly separate roles or track actions.
What teams really need is stable syncing, clear activity logs, and environments that behave identically no matter who is using them.
Click to expand...
"Another big issue is poor permission control, too many tools don’t properly separate roles or track actions." - here absolutely agree

Black Ad said:
At scale, the real problems aren’t features, they’re coordination and consistency.
Things like profile corruption, session drops, and inconsistent fingerprints between team members happen more often than they should.
Another big issue is poor permission control, too many tools don’t properly separate roles or track actions.
What teams really need is stable syncing, clear activity logs, and environments that behave identically no matter who is using them.
Click to expand...
I know what you`re talking about, when one person from Mac and for example another person from Windows are using the sane profile, there it goes to problems

Black Ad said:
At scale, the real problems aren’t features, they’re coordination and consistency.
Things like profile corruption, session drops, and inconsistent fingerprints between team members happen more often than they should.
Another big issue is poor permission control, too many tools don’t properly separate roles or track actions.
What teams really need is stable syncing, clear activity logs, and environments that behave identically no matter who is using them.
Click to expand...
clear activity logs - is a basic for teams and not only
 
IM Dude said:
I am working with anti detect browser everyday. I am paying 11$ per month.
My main requirement is ease of use and price. I would prefer 5$ range with the same ease of use I an getting.
Automation and all other bells and whistles are secondary factor.
Click to expand...
If you don't mind, which anti detect browser you are using ?
 
If you're building your own, the biggest pain point for me is team workflows. Lot of tools make it a pain to share profiles without exposing proxies or cookies. Get that right an you're already ahead
 
alexgera said:
Hi everyone

Anyone here working heavily with anti-detect browsers?

Curious how satisfied you are with current solutions — especially when it comes to fingerprint spoofing, team workflows, automation, etc.

We’re currently building our own Chromium-based antidetect browser for affiliate/crypto use cases and looking for people with real volume to test it on actual workflows.

Our main focus is not just adding features, but implementing them properly — because a lot of tools seem to have everything on paper, but in practice things still work inconsistently.

For early testers, we’ll provide extended limits (including profiles) and full access to all features.

If anyone’s interested in testing it and sharing feedback, feel free to DM me here.
Click to expand...
Most current antidetect browsers look good feature-wise, but consistency is still the biggest issue especially with fingerprint stability, browser leaks, and automation reliability at scale. A lot of people care more about survival rate now than fancy UI/features. Sounds interesting though, especially if you’re focusing on real world workflows instead of just marketing features.
 
WahrenShamy said:
i downloaded it from there official website, when i extracted it, microsoft defender told me it contains this Trojan:Win32/Kepavll!rfn
Click to expand...
IM Dude said:
Yeah it's giving all of warnings now a days.
@BitBrowser 1 do you know what's going on?
Click to expand...
It's usually the fingerprint injection triggering a heuristic detection. Upload it to VirusTotal, nothing serious will pop. Always grab it from the official site, check the signature, and reach out to our support if you're still concerned.
 
BitBrowser 1 said:
It's usually the fingerprint injection triggering a heuristic detection. Upload it to VirusTotal, nothing serious will pop. Always grab it from the official site, check the signature, and reach out to our support if you're still concerned.
Click to expand...
I got the update to the latest version today, the clearrisk.exe warning is gone. So no warnings for me now.
 
Bitbrowser is not such a good one. They leak the proxy and very backdated. No anti suppliers can offers fingerpint right now. but for quality adspower and gologin that I will preffer.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top