How important is traffic on linking domains vs just DA/DR?

KoD-

Elite Member
Jr. VIP
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
5,963
Reaction score
764
Traffic matters more than just DA/DR.
if a site has real visitors, it shows it’s active and trusted.
what do you say guys?
 
Traffic matters more than just DA/DR.
if a site has real visitors, it shows it’s active and trusted.
what do you say guys?
I completely agree. DA and DR can be easily manipulated through spammy techniques these days, but real organic traffic is a much harder signal to fake. A link from a site that Google actually sends visitors to is always going to carry significantly more weight than a 'dead' high-DR site.
 
Traffic definitely matters more than just DA/DR, but it’s not the only thing either. Real traffic shows the site is alive, indexed, and actually trusted by users, which usually means links from it carry more value.

Traffic alone isn’t enough. A site can have traffic but still be irrelevant to your niche, which weakens the impact.

Look at relevance first, then traffic, and use DA/DR only as a secondary metric. A relevant site with real traffic will almost always outperform a high DR site with no audience.
 
DA/DR means nothing. Authority has shifted a long way in the past few years. I'm in that point that I feel that its very complex to determine what authority actually means. Google calls it EEAT to make it hard to decypher. Direct organic visits could clearly mean that the algorithm already values the site, but solely I'm not sure if its a matter of EEAT.

I have not found big experiments on EEAT lately. In the past, 5 years ago I would say, there were plenty of interesting experiments around this, but the lack of this is clearly a symptom that we are in the dark ages of SEO.
 
Real traffic is usually a much better trust signal than DA or DR alone because it shows the site is active, indexed, and still getting attention. DA/DR can be inflated pretty easily, but real traffic is harder to fake at scale and usually says more about link quality. Best links have both, but if I had to choose one, I’d take relevance and real traffic over raw metrics every time.
 
Traffic matters more than just DA/DR.
if a site has real visitors, it shows it’s active and trusted.
what do you say guys?
Traffic from search engine(Google) is much more valuable than mere DA. When your site is ranking it's because Google think it has value and worth the space. Google doesn't care about third-party metrics like DA. You shouldn't care as much.
 
Traffic matters more than just DA/DR.
if a site has real visitors, it shows it’s active and trusted.
what do you say guys?
metrics like Da Dr are helpful but organic traffic shows the site still has real authority.
 
DR can be easily boosted with redirects and spam backlinks, but real traffic is what actually Google cares about.
 
Agree real traffic is a stronger signal than just metrics like Ahrefs Domain Rating. A site with active visitors shows trust and relevance.. Ideally, combine both solid metrics + real traffic + niche relevance for the best link value.
 
Real traffic usually says more about a site’s value than just DA/DR alone, especially when you’re looking at engagement and conversions. That said, it’s always best to balance both metrics depending on what you’re trying to achieve.
 
Traffic matters more than just DA/DR.
if a site has real visitors, it shows it’s active and trusted.
what do you say guys?
I’d agree to a point, traffic usually means the site is actually alive not just built for metrics
 
Agree real traffic often matters more than metrics like Moz Domain Authority. Active sites show trust and can send referral traffic too. Best results come from combining relevance, real visitors, and solid authority not just chasing DR/DA alone.
 
Traffic matters more than just DA/DR.
if a site has real visitors, it shows it’s active and trusted.
what do you say guys?
100%. Traffic shows a site is alive and trusted. High DR with no traffic is often just inflated metrics. Best links = relevant site + real traffic + engagement.
 
Traffic on linking domains matters more than just DA/DR. A site with real visitors and activity passes more value than a high DA site with no traffic.
 
I agree, real traffic shows the site is alive and trusted, while high DA without visitors often doesn’t add much value.
 
Traffic is often more important than just DA/DR. A site with real visitors shows trust and relevance. Google values user engagement, so links from active sites usually bring better SEO results.
 
DA/DR are just third-party metrics, not used directly by Google.
Real traffic signals that the site is alive, trusted, and actually indexed.
 
its totally different, if linking site have traffic it will gain more trust from google rather than just DA DR

I completely agree. DA and DR can be easily manipulated through spammy techniques these days, but real organic traffic is a much harder signal to fake. A link from a site that Google actually sends visitors to is always going to carry significantly more weight than a 'dead' high-DR site.

Traffic definitely matters more than just DA/DR, but it’s not the only thing either. Real traffic shows the site is alive, indexed, and actually trusted by users, which usually means links from it carry more value.

Traffic alone isn’t enough. A site can have traffic but still be irrelevant to your niche, which weakens the impact.

Look at relevance first, then traffic, and use DA/DR only as a secondary metric. A relevant site with real traffic will almost always outperform a high DR site with no audience.

DA/DR means nothing. Authority has shifted a long way in the past few years. I'm in that point that I feel that its very complex to determine what authority actually means. Google calls it EEAT to make it hard to decypher. Direct organic visits could clearly mean that the algorithm already values the site, but solely I'm not sure if its a matter of EEAT.

I have not found big experiments on EEAT lately. In the past, 5 years ago I would say, there were plenty of interesting experiments around this, but the lack of this is clearly a symptom that we are in the dark ages of SEO.

Real traffic is usually a much better trust signal than DA or DR alone because it shows the site is active, indexed, and still getting attention. DA/DR can be inflated pretty easily, but real traffic is harder to fake at scale and usually says more about link quality. Best links have both, but if I had to choose one, I’d take relevance and real traffic over raw metrics every time.

Traffic from search engine(Google) is much more valuable than mere DA. When your site is ranking it's because Google think it has value and worth the space. Google doesn't care about third-party metrics like DA. You shouldn't care as much.

metrics like Da Dr are helpful but organic traffic shows the site still has real authority.

DR can be easily boosted with redirects and spam backlinks, but real traffic is what actually Google cares about.

Agree real traffic is a stronger signal than just metrics like Ahrefs Domain Rating. A site with active visitors shows trust and relevance.. Ideally, combine both solid metrics + real traffic + niche relevance for the best link value.

Real traffic usually says more about a site’s value than just DA/DR alone, especially when you’re looking at engagement and conversions. That said, it’s always best to balance both metrics depending on what you’re trying to achieve.

I’d agree to a point, traffic usually means the site is actually alive not just built for metrics

Agree real traffic often matters more than metrics like Moz Domain Authority. Active sites show trust and can send referral traffic too. Best results come from combining relevance, real visitors, and solid authority not just chasing DR/DA alone.

100%. Traffic shows a site is alive and trusted. High DR with no traffic is often just inflated metrics. Best links = relevant site + real traffic + engagement.

Traffic on linking domains matters more than just DA/DR. A site with real visitors and activity passes more value than a high DA site with no traffic.

I agree real traffic is a stronger signal than just DA/DR. A site with actual users is usually indexed, updated, and trusted, so links carry more weight. That said, relevance matters just as much a smaller but highly relevant site can outperform a high-traffic but unrelated one. One mistake is chasing high DR links with zero topical relevance they look good on paper but don’t move rankings.

Totally agree with this. I’ve seen high DR pages with almost no visitors – useless for us. A mid-traffic site in my niche actually sends real clicks and better conversions. For me, relevance + traffic > DR alone, but a site with both is the sweet spot.

I agree, real traffic shows the site is alive and trusted, while high DA without visitors often doesn’t add much value.

Traffic is often more important than just DA/DR. A site with real visitors shows trust and relevance. Google values user engagement, so links from active sites usually bring better SEO results.

DA/DR are just third-party metrics, not used directly by Google.

Real traffic signals that the site is alive, trusted, and actually indexed.
Google seems to be valuing real engagement and traffic signals more now, while DA/DR are becoming less reliable as standalone quality indicators.
 
Real traffic matters more than DR/DA. A site with actual visitors and rankings is way more valuable than a DR70 site with zero traffic.
 
Back
Top