I Need Help with new cloak

kovek

Newbie
Joined
Feb 2, 2024
Messages
12
Reaction score
3
I used Hideclick for a long time, and yesterday, to my surprise, the services were shut down.

I would like your help to find a new cloak that has the same function or is better than it. From what I've discovered, Hideclick worked like metafresh.

Yesterday I tried Cloakerly, but I lost two campaigns due to cloaking techniques. One of them had been running for more than 15 days.

Another observation: I run ads on Google, and they are niche black ads.

Thanks
 
I used Hideclick for a long time, and yesterday, to my surprise, the services were shut down.

I would like your help to find a new cloak that has the same function or is better than it. From what I've discovered, Hideclick worked like metafresh.

Yesterday I tried Cloakerly, but I lost two campaigns due to cloaking techniques. One of them had been running for more than 15 days.

Another observation: I run ads on Google, and they are niche black ads.

Thanks
Besides the cloaking, what sort of accounts are you using? Sometimes the accounts are the problem.
 
Besides the cloaking, what sort of accounts are you using? Sometimes the accounts are the problem.
I usually use accounts with $3,000-$5,000 in spending.
But I never got banned for cloaking, it was always for trading practices, which is common.
But yesterday, when I was forced to change the cloak, I got 2 bans for System Fraud: cloaking techniques.
 
Cloakerly is mostly IP-based detection which is why Google's crawlers slip through — they rotate residential and cloud IPs constantly now. Adspect or TrafficArmor both do ASN + behavioral analysis on top of IP checks, way closer to what HideClick did. If you were running 15-day campaigns on HideClick without issues, Adspect should give you similar longevity since their crawler DB updates daily.
 
Cloakerly is mostly IP-based detection which is why Google's crawlers slip through — they rotate residential and cloud IPs constantly now. Adspect or TrafficArmor both do ASN + behavioral analysis on top of IP checks, way closer to what HideClick did. If you were running 15-day campaigns on HideClick without issues, Adspect should give you similar longevity since their crawler DB updates daily.
Cloakerly isn’t IP-based — IP is just one weak signal. We’re doing ASN + behavioral analysis + ML on top, and correlating everything instead of relying on single checks.

Google slipping through isn’t just IP rotation anymore — they behave like real users. If you’re only looking at IP/ASN, you’ll miss it. The key now is signal fusion + behavior, not just databases.
 
I’ve tested TrustCloaker, TrafficShield, Cloakerly, TrafficGuardian, and ClickStopper after HideClick shutdown. From what I’ve seen, TrafficShield & TrafficGuardian are more stable for scaling, TrustCloaker is simple for basic use, and Cloakerly is okay but can be risky if setup isn’t proper.
Your issue is not the tool Google detection is much stronger now and even small mistakes can kill campaigns
Honestly, focus more on setup (domains, white page, routing) because no cloaker is 100% safe
Its true, with tools they follow fix pattern and google bot detects its fix pattern. I am using manual cloaking like: i have created own white-page, main-page and redirection method which is manual not with a tool.

Using manual system, where its easy to identify which thing google bot caught and to change it.

This manual cloaking system is beat for cloaking.
 
I used Hideclick for a long time, and yesterday, to my surprise, the services were shut down.

I would like your help to find a new cloak that has the same function or is better than it. From what I've discovered, Hideclick worked like metafresh.

Yesterday I tried Cloakerly, but I lost two campaigns due to cloaking techniques. One of them had been running for more than 15 days.

Another observation: I run ads on Google, and they are niche black ads.

Thanks
Google is now using advanced AI crawlers and behavioral analysis to detect cloaking patterns. So you will need AI-based cloaker like Trafficshield, Trafficguardian and you also need good setup too without good setup any cloaker will fail.
 
Bro, it's a bad cloak. You normal cloak like Binom / Cloakit / Adspect
 
Really..? Cloaking itself isn’t that hard, the main problem is account stability.
But the above-mentioned sewer is very often penetrated by bots at the stage of moderation of an advertising campaign. That's the main problem. I'm not imposing my opinion, I'm just sharing my experience.
 
But the above-mentioned sewer is very often penetrated by bots at the stage of moderation of an advertising campaign. That's the main problem. I'm not imposing my opinion, I'm just sharing my experience.
Yeah I get your point now. That’s actually the main thing I was trying to understand — not just the cloaking itself, but how stable it stays during moderation.

Appreciate you sharing your experience.
 
i use hideeclick , their price is also good (admin delete my comment and photo), they have also many filter .
 
Google is now using advanced AI crawlers and behavioral analysis to detect cloaking patterns. So you will need AI-based cloaker like Trafficshield, Trafficguardian and you also need good setup too without good setup any cloaker will fail.
Yes, for ad account stability, we need to use a cloaker that keeps updating its cloaking ai technology from time to time.
 
Yeah, I get that. The technique part isn’t usually the hardest thing — keeping things stable and consistent over time is what actually makes or breaks it.
 
I used Hideclick for a long time, and yesterday, to my surprise, the services were shut down.

I would like your help to find a new cloak that has the same function or is better than it. From what I've discovered, Hideclick worked like metafresh.

Yesterday I tried Cloakerly, but I lost two campaigns due to cloaking techniques. One of them had been running for more than 15 days.

Another observation: I run ads on Google, and they are niche black ads.

Thanks
A lot of people noticed stricter detection recently, especially on Google Ads black niches. Many older cloaking setups that worked for years are getting burned much faster now because Google improved behavioral analysis and review systems.

If campaigns that were stable for 15+ days suddenly died after switching cloakers, it’s usually a sign that the fingerprinting/redirect behavior is getting detected somewhere in the flow.

Most media buyers now focus more on:

- cleaner bridge pages
- lower-aggression funnels
- account trust/history
- realistic user behavior
- slower scaling

rather than relying only on the cloaker itself for stability.
 
I used Hideclick for a long time, and yesterday, to my surprise, the services were shut down.

I would like your help to find a new cloak that has the same function or is better than it. From what I've discovered, Hideclick worked like metafresh.

Yesterday I tried Cloakerly, but I lost two campaigns due to cloaking techniques. One of them had been running for more than 15 days.

Another observation: I run ads on Google, and they are niche black ads.

Thanks
I think infrastructure and account quality matters more than the cloaker itself now. Most tools work fine until Google starts detecting unusual patterns.
 
Yeah, it really did suck that HC closed down. i am trying out TrafficSaviour at the moment, and it works, although bimbos were right in saying that if you do not have a trustworthy account, you will still be moderated anyway.
 
Back
Top