goldengod420
Newbie
- Jan 1, 2008
- 30
- 24
Because of people like you, there are thousands of innocent people in jail because they want to convict someone on opinion rather than evidence.
OJ can't be used in your argument because he is irrelevant to this case. He got off on a technicality because of planted evidence.
There was no evidence to convict MJ. The only evidence people had is their opinions and a accuser. That is not guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and my reasonable doubt is this,
When I was little, I had sleep overs where we all slept in the same bed, does that make us gay? Hell no it doesn't. MJ was a child stuck in a grown mans body.
OJ doesn't count cause he was guilty as shit and therefore your argument doesn't work. I find it funny that you say that it is because of people like me. You know nothing about me at all and if you are ignorant enough to look the other way because someone can sing and dance, then by all means do so. You do have some valid points, but the fact remains that he raped kids.... guilty or not, he did. No matter what argument you present to me, you will never change my mind. No matter what argument I put forth, you will defend him. It is just that simple. If he didn't rape kids, then I am wrong. Even if that was the case, he was still a creepy and weird dude. He was Peter Pan. Are you thinking or just typing? What kind of grown man acts like that? He didn't have a childhood and was trying to make up for it. Tough break, lots of people had tough childhoods(being rich and famous is a better than the type of people then I am talking about) and they went on to be normal. If some weird, plastic surgery, eccentric(being generous with that word), accussed child molester was sleeping with your kids, I bet you might have a different opinion. But hey, he could sing and dance, so lets treat him like he was a god.