[METHOD] Working YouTube Views Method as of 09/18/13

[royserpa]

Don't use it, a video that I have tested has been banned.
Anyway, thanks for the share.

Only a good case study should provide real results.
I might do it, but as i am not into yt, I dont care about this yet...

 

[Fxbob]

This method used to work about a year ago then youtube filtered it heavily and the ratio dropped to less than 5%. I should also mention that Skittles is absolutely correct; even though I've never used this script for any of my clients; I did run some tests and I can confirm that it results in a ban 90% of the times if you use it without the proper modification, go ahead and try to test it on any video (even if it's unlisted) then simply wait 1-2 weeks and check the video again, it won't be there 90% of the times.

 

[playerb]

"You agree not to use or launch any automated system, including without limitation, "robots," "spiders," or "offline readers," that accesses the Website in a manner that sends more request messages to the YouTubeâ„¢ servers in a given period of time than a human can reasonably produce in the same period by using a conventional on-line web browser."

it's not rocket science

 

[Sleinad]

"You agree not to use or launch any automated system, including without limitation, "robots," "spiders," or "offline readers," that accesses the Website in a manner that sends more request messages to the YouTubeâ„¢ servers in a given period of time than a human can reasonably produce in the same period by using a conventional on-line web browser."

it's not rocket science

The point is that if Google bans people for using these sorts of methods on their videos, then people could go around getting any video removed. They can't use banning as a solution, but instead figuring out how to patch these methods and only count legit views. Using these systems is against the rules but it doesn't really matter. The day Google starts banning people will be the day you see videos disappearing from famous big time YouTubers, and YouTube would collapse.

 

[Fxbob]

The point is that if Google bans people for using these sorts of methods on their videos, then people could go around getting any video removed. They can't use banning as a solution, but instead figuring out how to patch these methods and only count legit views. Using these systems is against the rules but it doesn't really matter. The day Google starts banning people will be the day you see videos disappearing from famous big time YouTubers, and YouTube would collapse.

They factor the reputation of the channel, it seems that only about 10% of the channels "pass" their filters and don't get banned, at least according to my tests; the remaining 90% do indeed get banned. It's somewhat similar to Google sandboxing, you can send thousands of crappy links to cnn.com and chances are it won't get sanxboxed but a new site or an average reputation site would most likely get penalized.

 

[rameshpvb]

Thank you for sharing

 

[jacobpov]

Make a loop set it to 100 , Send views from any referrer, use ANY traffic and keep sending with same IPS , Set retention to a crazy number .

Wait till the video gets removed .

 

[GainRank]

They factor the reputation of the channel, it seems that only about 10% of the channels "pass" their filters and don't get banned, at least according to my tests; the remaining 90% do indeed get banned. It's somewhat similar to Google sandboxing, you can send thousands of crappy links to cnn.com and chances are it won't get sanxboxed but a new site or an average reputation site would most likely get penalized.

He's saying you can do this to competitors, etc. I think it's dumb if they are seriously banning videos for this. I highly doubt that's the case though, they can't be that dumb. If that were the case, then I'm sure everyone here is going to start sending views to their competitors or people they don't like and getting their videos banned. I shared the method, I'm not going to go that far, but I'm just saying, it doesn't make sense that they would do that.

 

[etmcl]

i dont understand a damn word anyone can help me how to use this code to get views?

 

[Fxbob]

He's saying you can do this to competitors, etc. I think it's dumb if they are seriously banning videos for this. I highly doubt that's the case though, they can't be that dumb. If that were the case, then I'm sure everyone here is going to start sending views to their competitors or people they don't like and getting their videos banned. I shared the method, I'm not going to go that far, but I'm just saying, it doesn't make sense that they would do that.

In theory maybe it doesn't make sense, but in practice it's very explicit; they clearly state that the reason for the ban is for using "robots". That said, I agree, it's a bit aggressive; but it seems it's price they're currently willing to pay, at least until someone develops a bot that mass bans videos using this script to showcase the problem with their "solution".

 

[jacobpov]

There is a method with 1 cookie 1 ip and lower retention which seems to work perfectly good right now. But even that method gets some percentage of videos removed .. no one can guarantee anything since no one really knows how youtube picks up its victims with its views gaming detection system . Even mobile views get videos removed if you are unlucky ....

 

[Fxbob]

There are safe methods out there, they're harder to code and only a handful of people actually have access to them. The one shared here has been available for ages, I've seen it sold for as little as $5 months ago on fiverr and elsewhere. That's mainly why youtube started banning videos using this script.

 

[Tealover]

Firstly, omg op, this is great share.
Parts of this methods was shared before, not in youtube section, but I'm sure that I've seen it.
Ok, and now, to my mind, my fellow bhw brothers, there is only one way to save market prices and earn from youtube. We must create an gentlemen agreement on the price of 1k views and hide this thread from crawlers and lurkers!

 

[ibmethatswhoib]

I can't tell if this is genius and a lot of people are scared, so they're saying it sucks and will get your video banned. Or if it truly won't work like some say, only way to tell is to test it people.

 

[dymeksc]

interesing, thanks

 

[hajrobaba]

Do I upload index.html to root or public_html?

If you don't have any website in public_html, then upload.

If you have website on server, make new folder, name it whatever and upload index.html in that folder.

 

[hajrobaba]

Just to update: SCRIPT WORKS!!

yesteday I sent some visits to my page with script inside. Video before that has 71 views, now it have:

http://i.imgur.com/GmxyXL2.jpg

 

[richworld]

Just added my video one hour ago,I got 40 views,will update later.Thanks for the method:third:

 

[2ochi]

Nice share.

 

[SMMCity]

The funniest thing about this thread is; OP is trying to get this script patched because their service is overpriced and he/she can't compete with people on Fiverr. This is like negative SEO, I am surprised most users aren't pissed off with OP's poor work ethic.

Anyway the funny thing is I have a different script to this. This thread has made me realize that I need to abuse the script I have even more. Maybe I will start giving it away to random noobs just so there is more competition for OP.

Two can play this game OP. Remember karma is a bitch.

Before anyone tries to neg rep me, just remember everyone is entitled to their own opinion.