I feel I get a little pissed off here. I feel that the "head start" or the advantage I knew I had on the market is now not so big any more. Or am I wrong.
Could this possible be a good software(?),
or would it get your site banned from the indexes?
I got the impression that this software just explodes your web 2.0 efforts and then do not do anything about keeping your/our sites to ranked high in the SERPs.
I'm thinking this is not a good way to go because you need consistency in your marketing.
And I think Google will (for sure!) penalize thouse who uses this software. Google will se spikes of incoming links to your site = NOT NATURAL!
Or could one just run the software several times (once a month for a keyphrase) to get around this?
Just my thoughts...
Have you try it and get banned by using this software?
Not natural?? What you mean by not natural??
I'm appreciate if you can share your approach building your link?
ManToMan
None-Natural link building = Done by software or auto tools. You could get 100-100,000 links in a month.
(100,000 / 30 days = 3333 links pr day! Is that natural? Could you do that your self pr day by hand, by "submitting" one and one link? No way!
3333 links pr day could only be natural if you are a well established authority site, very big authority site - youtube, newspapers and so on...)
Natural link building = Google sees that you get a steady flow of links over time. So big spikes in your incoming linking is not good.
E.g. Do not get 500 links every monday. Spread them out over the week, 70 pr day. I think even 70 new incoming links would be to much, but I'm only guessing here...
Think about it; Your new domain just registerd. A week after this you start to get 70 links each day? And you are for sure no authority site.
For a commercial website you just created to sell something or promote something,... personally I think 2-10 links pr week is natural. If you keep that up for a long time, you will probably get bether PR and all the good stuff that comes with it...
Auto tools like SEnuke will just boost you in the beginning, but destroy your site very quickly WHEN (not if) Google catches up...
None-Natural link building = Done by software or auto tools. You could get 100-100,000 links in a month.
(100,000 / 30 days = 3333 links pr day! Is that natural? Could you do that your self pr day by hand, by "submitting" one and one link? No way!
3333 links pr day could only be natural if you are a well established authority site, very big authority site - youtube, newspapers and so on...)
Joe russell(creator of SEnuke) suggests to go slow and steady. He never asks to submit loads of website to social bookmark. There are many cool features in the software that will make the sites to think that it is entered by human. I just used it for 2days and in 24hours one of my squidoo lens appeared in first page for certain keyword in google. Thats cool!!
Still we have to be very careful so that google and social bookmarking sites doesn't think that we are spamming.
I started this thread before using this software. After seeing the results I'm in love with this software. Its a great software for lazy peoples like me.![]()
SENuke is really a jack of all trades, and a master of none. It's buggy as heck, and it doesn't do a great job of the things it supposed to do. There is no way i'd pay $97 a month for it.
There are many applications that perform all the individual functions of SENuke, but do it 100 times better. SENuke is just a crippled mashup of these other programs.
SENuke is really a jack of all trades, and a master of none. It's buggy as heck, and it doesn't do a great job of the things it supposed to do. There is no way i'd pay $97 a month for it.
There are many applications that perform all the individual functions of SENuke, but do it 100 times better. SENuke is just a crippled mashup of these other programs.
Please stop with those misleading thread titles in boosey12 style.
Thank you in advance
p.s. check senuke forums, but keep in mind that it's highly possible that threads in their forum are biased: http://www.senuke.com/forum
what was "misleading" about the title of this thread? "senuke opinions?" it meant exactly what he was asking about. i for one would like to know on a independent forum what the software is like, why ask on a biased forum?