- Jul 10, 2009
- 6,315
- 2,643
Did you try running it with the host file redirect in place? I believe that's the purpose of that option so you can run a secondary service. (I think)
You should try it with that option.
GSA Search Engine Ranker - Extremely Powerful Linkbuilding Software (Free 5 Day Trial)
- Thread starter s4nt0s
- Start date
Did you try running it with the host file redirect in place? I believe that's the purpose of that option so you can run a secondary service. (I think)
You should try it with that option.
D
Deleted member 36594
Guest
I found a super major bug in SER.
I have about 31 campaigns in one of my VPS' SER.
I highlighted all of them and edit the engines to disable scridb engine.
Upon doing so, the application pop an error saying it has an error and asked if whether I want to continue, restart or close the application.
I closed it and launched SER again.
Now here's the major bug: all my projects got screwed up.
For instance, at least 10 campaigns have their details missing (image comments, video duration, .etc).
Worst still, some of them inherited the details from the first few projects I have.
All my work is gone and I have to restore the backups which are really-really old.
I've reported this issue to Sven.
But fuck this, I am really fucking frustrated and pissed about this.
I have about 31 campaigns in one of my VPS' SER.
I highlighted all of them and edit the engines to disable scridb engine.
Upon doing so, the application pop an error saying it has an error and asked if whether I want to continue, restart or close the application.
I closed it and launched SER again.
Now here's the major bug: all my projects got screwed up.
For instance, at least 10 campaigns have their details missing (image comments, video duration, .etc).
Worst still, some of them inherited the details from the first few projects I have.
All my work is gone and I have to restore the backups which are really-really old.
I've reported this issue to Sven.
But fuck this, I am really fucking frustrated and pissed about this.
Sam Wylde
Regular Member
- Jul 1, 2011
- 475
- 77
Your not the first one, had this happen to me twice.
Also somehow verified urls form one project will end up ion the wrong one. Sent a report to a client and only half of the verified urls had the right url. All the others were from different projects.
(dont think this posted before)
Im seeing a lot of places online that say to only use GSA to create 2nd and 3rd tier links and not 1st. Is it the quality of links that cant be set high enough for tier1 or is it the quality of the work it does - not looking complete and human enough? Or is this just a falicy?
Im seeing a lot of places online that say to only use GSA to create 2nd and 3rd tier links and not 1st. Is it the quality of links that cant be set high enough for tier1 or is it the quality of the work it does - not looking complete and human enough? Or is this just a falicy?
Lee G
Regular Member
- Apr 13, 2009
- 411
- 221
There is an easy way to back up ser
In the GSA folder under app data, there is a folder called projects
Making a copy of that folder, will back everything up. Your project data that is.
I find it quicker than highlighting all projects and backing up
- Jul 10, 2009
- 6,315
- 2,643
Best thing to do is to post in the GSA forum about it. Sven is usually pretty responsive to threads like that.
Actually, I saw him mention somewhere on the forum that something like this is on his to-do list. An automated project backup.
Its up to the user if they think the links are good enough. If you set it to post to PR3 with Max 50 Outbound Links and use a decent bad words list, I don't see how the link could be considered low quality.
How do you set category to random? I only get the option to add categories and it mentions using masks which I don't understand either. Thanks
You can just list categories like for example if you're in weight loss niche you would do some like: *Health*, *Fitness*, *Exercise*, and I always throw in a *General*, *Miscellaneous*.
The software will pick a random category if none of the ones you put in are found. You set this option in your project options where it says, "If a form field can't be filled (like category) choose random. By default its set to "ask user" so you will need to click on it and it will change.
mikeybobikey
Junior Member
- Dec 26, 2009
- 169
- 265
See below .. also be sure to set your retries to around 5 or 6 for CS (for the majority of platforms .. evidently there is at least one platform according to Ozz that only allows 3 attempts). With this setting you're all but guaranteed a correct solve.
To use a human solving service (such as DBC or de-captcher or ShanipBo) as your second option, you will need to DESELECT 'use hosts file redirect' from the settings menu
not sure which one ozz was referring to, but i know some of the forums (eg. phpBB) default setting is 3 max retries, but then most of those are pretty easy to solve in CS CDK so i think it should be ok.. i am now trying the higher retries of 6 for CS to see how it goes
UnDerDoG81
Power Member
- Oct 29, 2009
- 557
- 87
Just checking the Trial version and played around for 1 day now. Looks like a great software! But I (or the software) also was not able to create any web 2.0 property?
I use 10 private proxys and decaptcha service.
I use 10 private proxys and decaptcha service.
@s4nt0s, could u pass on a feature request to sven regarding captchas, at present it seems that if a captcha is returned from CS as 'unknown', SER sends it again x amount of times according to the SER captcha retries setting before sending it to the backup captcha service.
if the captcha (with same dimensions) is unknown to the 1st captcha solving service (eg. CS) then it is not going to get solved no matter how many times it gets sent.
any submit page would only use 1 captcha type, so if SER can detect the dimensions (maybe already is? or maybe this is a problem for this feature?) and if it gets an 'unknown' status back from CS, and then the next submit attempt has the exact same captcha dimensions (for the same exact submit form) then it could just forward the next try to the backup captcha service, this could save resources for other purposes and help remove the problem of getting temp bans from the engines that only allow a few attempts.
(this feature would definitely need to detect the captcha dimensions, as some engines randomly change the captcha dimensions on every submit attempt.)
what do u think?
if the captcha (with same dimensions) is unknown to the 1st captcha solving service (eg. CS) then it is not going to get solved no matter how many times it gets sent.
any submit page would only use 1 captcha type, so if SER can detect the dimensions (maybe already is? or maybe this is a problem for this feature?) and if it gets an 'unknown' status back from CS, and then the next submit attempt has the exact same captcha dimensions (for the same exact submit form) then it could just forward the next try to the backup captcha service, this could save resources for other purposes and help remove the problem of getting temp bans from the engines that only allow a few attempts.
(this feature would definitely need to detect the captcha dimensions, as some engines randomly change the captcha dimensions on every submit attempt.)
what do u think?
- Jul 10, 2009
- 6,315
- 2,643
Did you have a captcha service setup?
@s4nt0s, could u pass on a feature request to sven regarding captchas, at present it seems that if a captcha is returned from CS as 'unknown', SER sends it again x amount of times according to the SER captcha retries setting before sending it to the backup captcha service.
if the captcha (with same dimensions) is unknown to the 1st captcha solving service (eg. CS) then it is not going to get solved no matter how many times it gets sent.
any submit page would only use 1 captcha type, so if SER can detect the dimensions (maybe already is? or maybe this is a problem for this feature?) and if it gets an 'unknown' status back from CS, and then the next submit attempt has the exact same captcha dimensions (for the same exact submit form) then it could just forward the next try to the backup captcha service, this could save resources for other purposes and help remove the problem of getting temp bans from the engines that only allow a few attempts.
(this feature would definitely need to detect the captcha dimensions, as some engines randomly change the captcha dimensions on every submit attempt.)
what do u think?
No problem. I'll run it by him now.
SEOSupport
BANNED
- Apr 9, 2012
- 166
- 115
Looks promising...I'm buying it..."Throwing Scrapebox in the trash, where it belongs".
- Jul 10, 2009
- 6,315
- 2,643
Good to hear you're buying it. I'll have to say Scrapebox doesn't belong in the trash though. SB is a great tool.
- Jul 10, 2009
- 6,315
- 2,643
Are you running PR and OBL filter? Might be best to turn those off when doing the web 2.0's.
- Jul 10, 2009
- 6,315
- 2,643
4.29 - new: ability to use ArticleBuilder
- new: option to use spell errors in descriptions to fight duplicate content
- new: support for a new macro called #err[0..10000]
This will modify the content with typos/misspelling. The higher the number the more
typos are generated (but keep it readable for humans). This is not modifying your
anchor text of URL if used in the text.
You might ask for what is this useful? Some say it fights duplicate content,
some say it's rubbish. At least you can decide to use it or not.
- new: support for a new macro called #gennick[BLAHH,min,max]
this creates a random login with min/max length. The first parameter is not used for now.
- new: support for a new macro called #random[a..z,A..Z,0..9,@,!,;]
this will insert a char from the given range into the field
- new: support for a new macro called #file="c:\xyz.txt"
this will insert the content from a file (or URL)
- new: #file_links can now use URLs as parameters
- fix: minor bug on URL verification (login is no longer parsing for links)
- new: option to use spell errors in descriptions to fight duplicate content
- new: support for a new macro called #err[0..10000]
This will modify the content with typos/misspelling. The higher the number the more
typos are generated (but keep it readable for humans). This is not modifying your
anchor text of URL if used in the text.
You might ask for what is this useful? Some say it fights duplicate content,
some say it's rubbish. At least you can decide to use it or not.
- new: support for a new macro called #gennick[BLAHH,min,max]
this creates a random login with min/max length. The first parameter is not used for now.
- new: support for a new macro called #random[a..z,A..Z,0..9,@,!,;]
this will insert a char from the given range into the field
- new: support for a new macro called #file="c:\xyz.txt"
this will insert the content from a file (or URL)
- new: #file_links can now use URLs as parameters
- fix: minor bug on URL verification (login is no longer parsing for links)
The speed at which Sven adds in new features like Article Builder after we request them is awesome.