Markthedude
Power Member
- Feb 26, 2010
- 572
- 274
Here is an interesting article I just found while browsing G+
I wonder just how bad things really are behind the scenes at FB when it comes to the advertising side of things now that they're public.
I don't do FB ads but for those of you who do, do you feel that this is an accurate description for how your campaigns perform? I mean, a "claimed" 80% fraud rate for clicks seems a bit high and you would think there would be other companies speaking. Although, Chevrolet, last time I was reading up on FB ads, did pull completely out of the FB ads market...
Advertiser leaving Facebook after discovering that 80% of the clicks they're paying for are from 'bots.'
A company called Limited Run publicly announced on Facebook that they're leaving Facebook, and for two reasons:
First, they did their own analytics and found that 80% of the clicks Facebook was charging them for were from automated "bots."
Second, the company changed their name. They requested that Facebook change their name on their business page. But Facebook told them (allegedly) that in order to change their name on Facebook, they would have to spend $2,000 more on advertising.
If these allegations are true, how widespread is this abuse?
Code:
[URL]https://www.facebook.com/limitedpressing/posts/209534972507958[/URL]
I wonder just how bad things really are behind the scenes at FB when it comes to the advertising side of things now that they're public.
I don't do FB ads but for those of you who do, do you feel that this is an accurate description for how your campaigns perform? I mean, a "claimed" 80% fraud rate for clicks seems a bit high and you would think there would be other companies speaking. Although, Chevrolet, last time I was reading up on FB ads, did pull completely out of the FB ads market...