My SEO Blueprint (SENuke, AMR, BMD, Xrumer, Scrapebox)

[cash202]

SorryI'm a bit confused. Have you stopped publishing to ArticleRanks, or just link them to your web2.0 sites now?

Stopped for now. I resumes posting to TrafficKaboom (membership closed) and UAW. One link to money site, one to random tier one property.

 

[cash202]

I am still at the AMR part of the cycle, but spent quite a lot of time on the social bookmarking part.

My site finally showed up in the serps today after 2 long months and it ranked at the bottom of page 2 for a high competition keyword.
This cycle is basically the only thing I have done in terms of getting backlinks and today proves it works amazing.

Thank you very much cash202 for sharing a great guide and all the help... it feels really good!

Did you do a single cycle? Page 2 in one shot is a very good result.

 

[cash202]

Cash, its been a year now since you posted this blueprint.

Have you added any social media to the mix? Like FB and Twitter?

You've dumped the blog networks. Anything else you've left out, or added to the campaign that is NOT in the OP?

Thanks a ton again man.

I didn't dump blogs completely. I dumped high PR blogs. TrafficKaboom and UAW are still OK. I have control blogs there and they are still indexed OK.

Manual tier one links I always tweet and Google+ like at least once (manually).

RSS feeds I post to my private RSS directory and they are Tweeted and Facebooked automatically.

That's about it. Nothing hardcore.

 

[cash202]

Since SEO has changed which of these methods still work and which still don't?

I already posted it in this thread. More than once.

1. SEO hasn't changed. Google just run another police action. We have big signs on main road here in Syndey and they display messages periodically like "Extra police patrols. Police is targeting speeding drivers" . This is exactly like Google. Last year police targeted article directories, today it is high PR blog networks. Next month they will be targeting drink driving, etc, etc, etc, ad infinitum...

2. EVERYTHING works IF done correctly. All of these methods work. The thing is, they are based on VERY old SEO principles, quality tier one links and link variety. If you rely on one particular link source too much (high PR blogs anyone?) you are screwed. Last year it was article marketers, now it's blog network users.

 

[retroslice]

Did you do a single cycle? Page 2 in one shot is a very good result.

Hi cash.

Yes a single cycle and not even completed yet.

I will admit my page has dropped to the top of page 4 now but I believe it is just google dance.
The wierd thing is that it dropped right after I used AMR, but I only submitted to 20 urls and 4 were successful so I highly doubt it was AMR (but the timing sure had me worried)

I believe another 2-3 cycles will get me in the top 2 results for sure.

Some of my inner pages are ranking at the top of page 2 for very competitive terms and I am quite amazed, already seeing more traffic.
But the youtube video doesn't show up in google video results at all, even though it is an exact search term I see a lot of other random ones outranking it (it was in #4 but now its completely gone).

Anyway, the point of this post is that the cycle definitely works people but it's hard work

 

[Mex-deluxe]

cash202, you could make an ebook from this thread and sell it as a WSO for $17 lol.

 

[hunar]

Hey Cash,

Again I wanted to thank you for this guide.

It's people like you that make this forum a great place to read everyday and is what always keeps me coming back.

I just have a couple questions for you if you don't mind?

I followed you guide basically to the Letter. I have 3-4 sites that I do these cycles with each cycle takes me about 8-9 hours to complete with my workers doing all the web 2.0's manually. I have one site that has about 2 million competing pages that I have done 9 cycles with and it's ranking in the middle of the 2nd page. Another site that has about 522,000 competing pages that I did around 5 cycles with that has completely gone from google. Not deindexed but deff penalized for something. This site was deff in the middle of the 1st page than 10th spot and than bam not anywhere on the 1st 20 pages.

The other 2 sites that I have done these cycles with are all ranking just fine and on the 1st page.

I guess 3 outta 4 is not bad at all but i'm very curious i've done the same thing to each site exact same cycle diff web 2.0's of course but very confused as to why one would get penalized on outta here and why the other 3 are good. If you'd like to know the keywords and sites. I'd have no problem sending it to you in a PM just let me know.

 

[pianoman199]

Hey Cash!

Do you use one account for all of your Youtube videos? Or do you also separate them by niche?

I heard youtube can ban multiple accounts.

Cheers!

 

[pianoman199]

Has anyone else here gotten slammed after April 24'th algorithm update? All my sites dropped catastrophically. It looks like it was mainly due to spammy backlinking which I attribute either to UAW or BMD, since those are the only two I linked directly to my site.

Perhaps, the anchor texts should have had more LSI keywords - or even non-keyword?

What changes, if any, will have to go into this blueprint now that Google is on our a$-$-es for 'over-optimization'?

 

[TheEditor]

Bumpity bump. I too had a number of sites clobbered by the update. It is difficult to tease out the factors though as a variety of promotional methods were used. Was hoping this thread would be hopping after the update.

 

[rugbyjack2005]

Another site that has about 522,000 competing pages that I did around 5 cycles with that has completely gone from google. Not deindexed but deff penalized for something. This site was deff in the middle of the 1st page than 10th spot and than bam not anywhere on the 1st 20 pages.

The other 2 sites that I have done these cycles with are all ranking just fine and on the 1st page.

How many keywords did you target for the site that got penalised?

 

[Mex-deluxe]

Hey,

some guy has stolen your method and posted on Warrior F.:

http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-ppc-seo-discussion-forum/517131-exact-strategy-i-use-rank-any-keyword.html

Not exactly the same text, but very close.

Then read his last sentence in his post:

After countless PM's basically begging me to run these SEO cycles for warriors - I have finally caved!

Priceless.

 

[Sehrschnell]

Has anyone else here gotten slammed after April 24'th algorithm update? All my sites dropped catastrophically. It looks like it was mainly due to spammy backlinking which I attribute either to UAW or BMD, since those are the only two I linked directly to my site.

If you look around is some threads, people using BMD and especially AMR directly to their money sites were slammed hard by big G recently.

I saw some bhw members going from P1 to like P13 after an AMR blast. The common denominator = automated tools directly to their money site.

Stick with cash202 proven method which is pointing good quality 1st Tier links to your money sites, and after blast your 1st Tiers links using BMD, AMR, UAW, Xrumer and Senuke X.

In fact, automated tools if you don't spread your submissions over a few days creates BIG BIG footprints. In 2nd or 3rd Tier, not so much because for now, SE focus on 1st Tier for spotting so much called "unnatural links". It's the easy way ;p. Try blasting 1500 Google + on the same URL within 2-3 days. Big big footprint.

As cash202 explained, it is an old recipe: white hat methods on 1st Tier, Black Hat for the rest.

 

[forestgump]

Great work, it was a nice read.

 

[cash202]

Hey cash,

thanks for all the info. I noticed you said to do the SE Nuke X web 2.0 project but the sites you mentioned are in the social network project. Should we do the web 2.0 project as well? Thanks and your the man.

Web 2.0 project in SENuke creates profile links. Sort of like very small XRumer blasts to high PR authority sites. It's up to you. I don't do it.

 

[cash202]

cash202, you could make an ebook from this thread and sell it as a WSO for $17 lol.

Too cheap. Some arsehole has already stole the thread and re-posted it there as his own. Didn't even
bother to edit much except dropping XRumer part because he probably has no balls or expertise (or both)
to run it. He also started some pathetic WSO service around it which is permanently sold out because he
doesn't know how to do it fast and efficiently.

 

[cash202]

Hey Cash,

Again I wanted to thank you for this guide.

It's people like you that make this forum a great place to read everyday and is what always keeps me coming back.

I just have a couple questions for you if you don't mind?

I followed you guide basically to the Letter. I have 3-4 sites that I do these cycles with each cycle takes me about 8-9 hours to complete with my workers doing all the web 2.0's manually. I have one site that has about 2 million competing pages that I have done 9 cycles with and it's ranking in the middle of the 2nd page. Another site that has about 522,000 competing pages that I did around 5 cycles with that has completely gone from google. Not deindexed but deff penalized for something. This site was deff in the middle of the 1st page than 10th spot and than bam not anywhere on the 1st 20 pages.

The other 2 sites that I have done these cycles with are all ranking just fine and on the 1st page.

I guess 3 outta 4 is not bad at all but i'm very curious i've done the same thing to each site exact same cycle diff web 2.0's of course but very confused as to why one would get penalized on outta here and why the other 3 are good. If you'd like to know the keywords and sites. I'd have no problem sending it to you in a PM just let me know.

Have you done anything else to the websites in the past? Any GWT warnings? Any signs of someone doing negative SEO?
Is there a possibility of manual review? Like, say, a lonely insurance affiliate site among big insurance corporations on the
page one?

 

[cash202]

Do you use one account for all of your Youtube videos? Or do you also separate them by niche?

I heard youtube can ban multiple accounts.

I also heard a lot of things that turned out to be ...well... not true, when I tested it.

I separate them by niche and have more than one account per niche.

 

[cash202]

Has anyone else here gotten slammed after April 24'th algorithm update? All my sites dropped catastrophically. It looks like it was mainly due to spammy backlinking which I attribute either to UAW or BMD, since those are the only two I linked directly to my site.

Perhaps, the anchor texts should have had more LSI keywords - or even non-keyword?

What changes, if any, will have to go into this blueprint now that Google is on our a$-$-es for 'over-optimization'?

As much as you need a link source variety, you need an anchor text variety for links going to your money site. And you need
non-keywords too. Accidentally the original version of the blueprint already included non-anchor links, if you read it carefully. It
was done for a completely different reason but turned out to be a good thing in a long run.

How do you go about anchor text variety?

1) Spin 100 of LSI anchors in one single cycle. Run 100 cycles.
2) Use one or two LSI related keywords per cycle. Run 100 cycles.

In both cases you'll create 100 different LSI keyword anchor text links to your site.
Both would work. I do number 2 because it works better for me.

 

[hunar]

Have you done anything else to the websites in the past? Any GWT warnings? Any signs of someone doing negative SEO?
Is there a possibility of manual review? Like, say, a lonely insurance affiliate site among big insurance corporations on the
page one?

No, nothing of the sort.

I can tell you the Domain everything if you'd like?

It could also be G messing around as well with this new update. But it actually just happened to another site of mine as well that i followed the blueprint step by step. Like I follow it to the T. I've got it printed out and above my comp so I can reference it whenever.