Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[fr33sh]

Hi,

Unfortunately you'll have to add them manually. It'll take a couple minutes, sorry. There's a quicker way if you're good with Excel.

You can use the & sign.

Say A1 is your proxy and port, and B1 is your username and password.
Just do this: =A1&B1

On the bright side, yes the proxy checker in UNF checks for all of those and also query the other data providers to make sure the proxies haven't been banned in the past.

Clyde

Hey. If you wanted to do this even quicker, as well as have the txt file ready for future use you could try this... load the proxies into a text file and use the replace function in notepad.

So for example:

xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxx:8080
xx.xxx.xx.xxx:8080

Just click edit ---> replace

replace :8080

replace with :8080:usernameassword (Note for some reason it put a smiley instead of a ":" )

Hope this helps. For me this is the easiest way to do this, plus my list is ready for any tool I may need.

Hope I'm not intruding op. Just wanted to share another method.

 

[clyde]

Hey. If you wanted to do this even quicker, as well as have the txt file ready for future use you could try this... load the proxies into a text file and use the replace function in notepad.

So for example:

xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxx:8080
xx.xxx.xx.xxx:8080

Just click edit ---> replace

replace :8080

replace with :8080:usernameassword (Note for some reason it put a smiley instead of a ":" )

Hope this helps. For me this is the easiest way to do this, plus my list is ready for any tool I may need.

Hope I'm not intruding op. Just wanted to share another method.

Ah, awesome, thanks!

 

[Ghoast]

Hi - I've just bought UNF and I'm enjoying using it at the moment.

I just have a few questions - sorry if these have been asked before, don't have time to read 9 pages of thread..

How do you analyze the competition? I am interested on how the program actually comes to its conclusion that a keyword is good or not.. I have other keyword analysis tools and I'm getting different results. This program will say the keyword is medium or hard while another program will say it's 'great'..

I have found a keyword with 49k+ LMS with apperntly 'low competition' according to your software..

Also what does the Med.Links section mean? I'm guessing it's number of real competing websites?

 

[clyde]

Hi - I've just bought UNF and I'm enjoying using it at the moment.

I just have a few questions - sorry if these have been asked before, don't have time to read 9 pages of thread..

How do you analyze the competition? I am interested on how the program actually comes to its conclusion that a keyword is good or not.. I have other keyword analysis tools and I'm getting different results. This program will say the keyword is medium or hard while another program will say it's 'great'..

I have found a keyword with 49k+ LMS with apperntly 'low competition' according to your software..

Also what does the Med.Links section mean? I'm guessing it's number of real competing websites?

Hi,

We look at the Top 3 ranking websites instead of the Top 10 that other software look at because that's where you'll get traffic. i.e: You're not gonna get traffic ranking #9/#10.

We consider the following factors when analyzing the Top 3 websites: Number of backlinks to page, backlinks to domains, type of backlinks, Google PageRank of page, onpage SEO, keywords in domain name and more.

Med. Links = Median Links. Learn more about Media here: http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/A27533.html

Why Median instead of Average Links? Median is more accurate because it shows opportunity. A website ranking with very little links in a hard niche means it's possible for you to rank for that keyword as well if you have the same resources.

Disclaimer: It could also mean that the site has just been spammed and have tons of links that haven't been indexed yet.

Hope that answers your questions.

 

[Ghoast]

Hi,

We look at the Top 3 ranking websites instead of the Top 10 that other software look at because that's where you'll get traffic. i.e: You're not gonna get traffic ranking #9/#10.

We consider the following factors when analyzing the Top 3 websites: Number of backlinks to page, backlinks to domains, type of backlinks, Google PageRank of page, onpage SEO, keywords in domain name and more.

Med. Links = Median Links. Learn more about Media here: http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/A27533.html

Why Median instead of Average Links? Median is more accurate because it shows opportunity. A website ranking with very little links in a hard niche means it's possible for you to rank for that keyword as well if you have the same resources.

Disclaimer: It could also mean that the site has just been spammed and have tons of links that haven't been indexed yet.

Hope that answers your questions.

Hi, thanks for the fast answer!

Okay, so now my question to you is how accurate do you think this is? I'm just surprised by how fast you can analyse 3 different sites.. When I analyse with SEO Spyglass (powersuite) for just ONE site it can often take upwards of 40 minutes to analyse their backlinks..

I was using Stealth Keyword Analyser before this which would give me a vauge idea of competition then I would run the top competitors thru Spyglass to get a decent idea of competition..

Do you think I can substitute these two pieces of software for UNF?

Thanks and am loving the keyword expander part of the software btw!

 

[clyde]

Hi, thanks for the fast answer!

Okay, so now my question to you is how accurate do you think this is? I'm just surprised by how fast you can analyse 3 different sites.. When I analyse with SEO Spyglass (powersuite) for just ONE site it can often take upwards of 40 minutes to analyse their backlinks..

I was using Stealth Keyword Analyser before this which would give me a vauge idea of competition then I would run the top competitors thru Spyglass to get a decent idea of competition..

Do you think I can substitute these two pieces of software for UNF?

Thanks and am loving the keyword expander part of the software btw!

Hi, you can def. substitute SKCA, but as for SEO Spyglass, that's a completely different software that does something completely different. Ahrefs/Majestic SEO/Open Site Explorer would be their competitor.

Our difficulty score is pretty accurate but I always recommend users to double check with the free version of Traffic Travis and look at the Top 10 sites to see what they're really up against. Particularly the BL column.

Hope that helps.

 

[ardley216]

Right, just bought it, massive issue; does not give EXACT search results....

 

[blackieman]

Hi Clyde, please check this:
"fast loans" gives a difficulty of "1". I cleared results and tried again, same thing (with Med. Links of "0").

 

[blackieman]

Clyde:

By now we know the software is incredibly good and also incredibly hard on google (easy to get banned).

Why don't you consider a looser competition score, something that is not so heavy on google, and then we can hone in on keywords that interest us (maybwe even have two columns, level 1 comp score, and leval 2 comp. score). After all, I would always put the results into Market Samurai competition analysis to see if the keyword is worth it, so I am quite happy with a lighter version of comp. analysis.

 

[clyde]

Right, just bought it, massive issue; does not give EXACT search results....

It does, but you need to set the match-type in Settings if you haven't.

If you're talking about the results with quotes, no we never claimed we did because we already have a more accurate Difficulty score and that seems pointless and will require more time, proxies and captcha's.

Hi Clyde, please check this:
"fast loans" gives a difficulty of "1". I cleared results and tried again, same thing (with Med. Links of "0").

What are your Settings? What's your Location?

If it's set to a non-English country such as Japan, then "fast loans" will have a very low competition because most people don't search in English.

Clyde:

By now we know the software is incredibly good and also incredibly hard on google (easy to get banned).

Why don't you consider a looser competition score, something that is not so heavy on google, and then we can hone in on keywords that interest us (maybwe even have two columns, level 1 comp score, and leval 2 comp. score). After all, I would always put the results into Market Samurai competition analysis to see if the keyword is worth it, so I am quite happy with a lighter version of comp. analysis.

The ban is from our data providers but we'll probably have to do that and just use "Results with quotes" instead later, if we get banned entirely.

Thanks for the suggestion though.

 

[Loco Penguin]

Hey Clyde.
Can you add an option of "Checking" keywords in order to have a better view with which keywords I would like to work afterwards? by "checking" i mean:
__
|V| keyword
---

hope you understand..

 

[clyde]

Hey Clyde.
Can you add an option of "Checking" keywords in order to have a better view with which keywords I would like to work afterwards? by "checking" i mean:
__
|V| keyword
---

hope you understand..

Yes, I know what you're talking about. Will contemplate on it.

I was thinking, we should also have the ability to "Delete all unchecked keywords" and "Delete filtered keywords". Thoughts?

 

[Xaviers]

I see you get a membership to uniches when you buy this software. What is uniches exactly?

 

[clyde]

I see you get a membership to uniches when you buy this software. What is uniches exactly?

http://www.uniches.com/howitworks.php

It helps with generating new keyword ideas.

 

[giddianhi.roberts]

Definitely... It's a hassle having to unfilter to remove those results that doesn't really interest you... And it's kinda taking away from the whole automation thing... I think Kwd Scout has that, like automatically not showing keywords that doesn't pass the parameters you set, eg, Local search min 1500, CPC min $1, anything below that automatically doesn't make it to the actual output...

And I was trying the "Fetch Search Data" function, but it can't check on bulk, only 1 keyword at a time... Can we have that check in bulk, without having to expand... This is great if you're scraping keywords from scrapebox, and have the keywords checked in UNF...

Yes, I know what you're talking about. Will contemplate on it.

I was thinking, we should also have the ability to "Delete all unchecked keywords" and "Delete filtered keywords". Thoughts?

 

[blackieman]

Clyde:

RE: competition, you have the internal calculations, why don't you show it if we click on the competition box (similar to MNF).

 

[blackieman]

Clyde: Can you please give us a "Delete Filtered" button. Since there is a 30k keyword limit in the app, need to clear the keyword that are of no interest to save space.

 

[Xaviers]

Is it possible to use regular free scraped proxies with this? I see complaints about the proxy situation.

 

[fr33sh]

Here's my opinion so far:

Pros:

Ultimate niche finder is a pretty good program. I like how easy it is to expand your keyword reasearch all in one window. This makes keyword research fast. - I have to give you a hand clap for this. This is a very useful and time saving design.

Uniches is also a great tool for brainstorming niche ideas and finding niches. - Once again i have to give you hand clap for including this. It really adds value to your package.


Cons:

The program is pretty proxy hungry. (Although to be honest I only had 12 private proxies at the time of testing)

The next thing would be personally i like a little extra data on my keywords beside just a ranking.



Overall the program is good. The support (clyde) is awesome. At this moment though uniches is the deal sealer for me.

I can't wait to see where UNF goes in the future. In a few updates, I can honestly see Ultimate Niche Finder being hands down the ultimate keyword.

That being said. You might want to consider jumping in on this before the price goes up, which i'm sure it will. This tool is good but in the future it will be amazing.

I wish you the best clyde. I can't wait to see what happens with the software.

 

[blackieman]

The program is pretty proxy hungry. (Although to be honest I only had 12 private proxies at the time of testing)

The next thing would be personally i like a little extra data on my keywords beside just a ranking.

I agree with both, and have suggested ideas regarding both points. Specially on proxies, it has tons of failures with 68 proxy pack I have (shared, PBonanza), which means the competition queries are too complex. I suggested to Clyde to have a first pass (light) competition column which would fix the situation greatly.

Extra data: He has it, I have also suggested to show it - a la MNF

Overall GREAT program!