jimscott89
Registered Member
- Dec 10, 2011
- 68
- 5
Is it faster than BMD?
UltimateDemon; what do you think?
- Thread starter rosepleasure
- Start date
Spawn
BANNED
- Jun 20, 2009
- 1,184
- 394
Not much, it's kinda confusing to use just like bmd also , I wish Edwinsoft would stop building there shit like this
ccshack
Junior Member
- Feb 7, 2011
- 156
- 33
If anyone want to see how UD works, can check the video tutorials here: http://ultimatedemon.com/trainingvideos.htm
blackhatchampion
Senior Member
- Dec 29, 2010
- 1,069
- 552
any coupon code available for lifetime purchase.
royalmice
BANNED
- Aug 23, 2007
- 1,186
- 990
Looked at the sales page and the training videos, and looks ok.
Have bought both BMD and Article Deamon when it was released and was a bit dissapointed with both.
Still use BMD but it is so slooooowwwww and not much success.
Maybe i will try the new tool for a month to see f it is improved
Have bought both BMD and Article Deamon when it was released and was a bit dissapointed with both.
Still use BMD but it is so slooooowwwww and not much success.
Maybe i will try the new tool for a month to see f it is improved
oneder
Regular Member
- May 7, 2010
- 284
- 45
What things did you NOT like about your previous purchases as it's probably the same with this one?
I also got email from edwinsoft regarding ultimate demon release and seems to be good and all in one tool for various seo related activities.
Its basically combined form of BMD, AD, BCD etc along with web2.0, press release submission and video marketing and off course improved demoncore v3
Its basically combined form of BMD, AD, BCD etc along with web2.0, press release submission and video marketing and off course improved demoncore v3
krilin50
Regular Member
- Oct 26, 2008
- 262
- 19
I agree, also I my success rate with BMD hasn't been great and the final cost per bookmark is becoming quite expensive due to the third party captchas.
anyway, i hope this new package is not going to have a negative impact in keeping BMD up-to-date otherwise I will be an unhappy customer.
thoughts?
bennyb
Regular Member
- Feb 8, 2009
- 312
- 94
I used to think that BMD was a kickass software to create bookmarks. But what spoiled it for me is that Edwin charge you to use captcha. They charge you 4$ for every 1000 captchas solved. They do it through the decaptcher so if this new tool does the same they can have it...Anyways I don't like BMD anymore and will never go with edwin soft ever.
blackhit
Elite Member
- Jan 28, 2008
- 2,352
- 4,357
There's a $50 discount for the One-Time-Fee purchase for existing users.
jascoken
Senior Member
- Nov 1, 2010
- 1,135
- 753
Has anyone used the article submitter properly yet?
It looks like it does all the same dir' types as AMR. Does it allow importing of dir's like AMR does?
Does it allow proper and full multi-scheduling of article submissions. i.e. could I queue up 10 submission projects and just walk away?
Does anyone have a list of the 2.0's it supports? I think I read in another thread that there're only about 10-15? Are these all socket-based distribution or HTML (slower.)
Thanks!
It looks like it does all the same dir' types as AMR. Does it allow importing of dir's like AMR does?
Does it allow proper and full multi-scheduling of article submissions. i.e. could I queue up 10 submission projects and just walk away?
Does anyone have a list of the 2.0's it supports? I think I read in another thread that there're only about 10-15? Are these all socket-based distribution or HTML (slower.)
Thanks!
WARHOL
Power Member
- Apr 24, 2011
- 507
- 126
Looking for more reviews with this one, personally I love BMD for me its the only tool that can submit to 2k + bookmarking sites. The captcha is a lil bit absurd but one can cope up with the prices. If you can add some sites like bmd, this will be an awesome software. Speed is not an issue cause the lower the threads the higher the success rate and the more normal it will look. 
krilin50
Regular Member
- Oct 26, 2008
- 262
- 19
Have you tried Decaptcher with BMD? it's a little bit cheaper although success rate it's not great. I also agree with you I used to like this soft very much but now I am sort of disappointed. If you compare this with SB or AMR the success rate is not up to scratch.
spoon22
Regular Member
- May 7, 2011
- 323
- 155
BMD has a far better success rate then AMR.
I have 40.000 urls in AMR and get 1400 successful submissions...
I have 4000 urls in BMD and get 1500 sucessful submissions...
In addition BMD has some problems with footprints, sometimes you get an error and if you look on the site, your bookmark is there!
Especially if you see this:
unable to submit to page 2
unable to submit to page 3
Look on these sites and in 50% you will see your bookmark. BMD does a very good job. The biggest problem is, that many bookmarking sites aren't working, i tested a lot and you can't even post manually on them. So... BMD is not jesus
However there are 2 things, i don't like about BMD:
1. Captcha Costs
2. You can't dripfeed bookmarks for several projects at once and add projects on the fly <-- this would be an awesome feature
I'd like to run one campaign for 30 days. If i want to do 10 campaigns/month, i would need 10 different VPS and 10 BMD licenses. Pls change this edwinsoft!
Last edited:
kcollier63
Registered Member
- Nov 23, 2010
- 66
- 29
I am going to try for a refund.
For some reason I was hoping for much more in regards to the web 2.0 module. It only lists 12 web 2.0 sites and out of the box, 2 of those already are disabled. On my run, I was only able to get 3 successful web 2.0 accounts.
As for the rest of the software, I like the general idea. You fill out a task, schedule the task to run and then you are done. However, if you already have AMR and BMD and other tools for video, RSS, forums, etc., this software just kind of brings them all under one roof. It is great that you can add your own lists (except when it comes to web 2.0).
They do update their software regularly as I have their other tools. I think this one would be very good if the web 2.0 module had some value.
For some reason I was hoping for much more in regards to the web 2.0 module. It only lists 12 web 2.0 sites and out of the box, 2 of those already are disabled. On my run, I was only able to get 3 successful web 2.0 accounts.
As for the rest of the software, I like the general idea. You fill out a task, schedule the task to run and then you are done. However, if you already have AMR and BMD and other tools for video, RSS, forums, etc., this software just kind of brings them all under one roof. It is great that you can add your own lists (except when it comes to web 2.0).
They do update their software regularly as I have their other tools. I think this one would be very good if the web 2.0 module had some value.
kcollier63
Registered Member
- Nov 23, 2010
- 66
- 29
I just wanted to pop back in here with an update.
I did request a refund and my refund was processed within 30 minutes. I hope that I did not steer anyone away from this software as it can certainly be a good alternative to nuke and would be great for anyone who does not already have a bunch of tools.
I did request a refund and my refund was processed within 30 minutes. I hope that I did not steer anyone away from this software as it can certainly be a good alternative to nuke and would be great for anyone who does not already have a bunch of tools.
Couple of weeks have passed so I was hoping someone could come in with an update.
I am looking to invest in some tools in next couple of weeks and this will max out my budget of about $300/350.
I did notice comment from someone re SEO LINKROBOT and when reviewing the tool, from sales page so not conclusive, I notuiced that SEO linkrobot was cheaper but also that it did web 2.0 linking but no directories or videos, can anyone give value to which is better to have.
I am looking to invest in some tools in next couple of weeks and this will max out my budget of about $300/350.
I did notice comment from someone re SEO LINKROBOT and when reviewing the tool, from sales page so not conclusive, I notuiced that SEO linkrobot was cheaper but also that it did web 2.0 linking but no directories or videos, can anyone give value to which is better to have.