My SEO Blueprint (SENuke, AMR, BMD, Xrumer, Scrapebox)

[jessepop]

amazing

 

[Expertpeon]

I believe Google is smart enough to detect grammatically incorrect spun
garbage made off scraped EZA (EzineArticles).

There is no doubt in my mind that some type of grammar bot exists.

Mate, you're seriously overloading Google's indexing data grid here
Let them re-calculate index properly.

In my experience with serious blasts to low competition keyword, when
your feeder sites take over page one and two, is that it takes Google
up to a month or more to find out that all links are really going to your
money site and start to rank it.

Not a problem, I have PLENTY more to do, including getting PR4+ for an entire high PR blog network and finishing zenno poster templates for about 60 web 2.0s

 

[NTotal]

Cash202, firstly thanks for giving a very detailed blueprint. I have to read it few times to understand the whole concept.

I have a question, so you only use 1 article (hand-spin until 70% unique) for all submission, i.e. web 2.0 (manual & SENuke) and AMR? The optional extra acticles are for Bukisa, Qondio, and InfoBarrel?

 

[scorpa]

@NTotal

Take time to read the whole thread...the question has been answered more than ten times.

 

[cash202]

Regarding 2, are we talking about Web 2.0 as defined in SENukeX?
And I thought you said in an earlier post that you build on the existing accounts in order to create high PR pages (over-time) linking to the moneysite?

I have done one cycle, should i create new Web 2.0's for cycle 2? For example, a new wordpress account?

I usually have one set of accounts per niche (if you're promoting more than
one site per niche). If you promote only one site, it make sense to create
new set of accounts sooner.

 

[paparaz1]

F**king Awesome info man, its SEO GUIDE For Me Thanks man !

 

[Barbarossa]

I've started my first campaign:

1. Bukisa disapproved my article.

2. Hubpages asked for a phone number verification, then later disapproved as well. Screw them.

I've written UAW style of articles (spin every sentence 2 times so I have 3) and then handspin the crap out of every word (except the keyword) but while keeping it readable.

I even put random paragraphs, links, bold/italics, pics and everything Cash recommended in another thread of his.

And still the above two 2.0s say they're not unique.

Senuke says 16 different copies of my article with 45% uniqueness.

Can anyone please tell me what the hell I'm doing wrong?

Thanks a million Cash and everyone who has contributed.

 

[plycrmla]

If I'm being stupid please tell me but would it not make more sense to upload the video to a hosting site that all do follow links (i.e. blip, videojug, not youtube)? Am I missing something?

 

[lostgringos]

Cash Questions:

1. My 2nd cycle Youtube Video got removed from YT due to copyright (yeah I put some music in it, won't do that again lol). Is it gonna be really necessary for me to make a new video for cycle 2 and then go through all the Web 2.0 where I embedded the video and replace it with a new video. OR should I just keep it moving to Cycle 3. If I don't replace it, will it hurt my current money site rankings?

whenever you put music in a vid make sure to change up the pitch etc. Music is like a footprint. You will never have a vid removed again if you do this.

 

[jimmy19]

I think this is the most detailed thread I have seen at this forum,
excellent stuff and also great to see so many people taking action with it too.

Guess I best go buy some tools by the looks of it

 

[volkovm1]

Hi Cash, thank you for the great info. The one thing that I haven't understood from any guides online, including this one, is how to promote one website with many landing pages. If you could clear this up it would be greatly appreciated. For example if the site has the following structure:

homepage .blah /landing page 1 keyword
homepage .blah /landing page 2 for another keyword
homepage .blah /landing page 3 for another keyword
homepage .blah /landing page 4 for another keyword
and so on

Would it still be ok to run keyword focused campaigns that target those landing pages for a site that has for example 20 different landing pages? If you have done this, what is your experience with this? If this is not the best way to promote a multi-landing page website, how would you approach this?

As always, your input is greatly appreciated

1. I don't generally like wizards and other canned tools. The more twist
your method has comparing to what everybody else is doing, the better
your results will be. I use wizard only as an addition to the manual
campaigns. Didn't see much effect from using it.

If you read blueprint, AMR is already pointing to the money site. I don't
generally blast AMR specifically to the money site. Of course, there are
exceptions to all the rules.

2. More accounts on same sites and add more sites over time.

 

[ivan89]

Cash, I've been using Animoto for a few days and let me tell you that its service is really crappy! They only let me put up to 22 words in each text module, so I have to put my KW very shortened, and use a tiny url to backlink in the video. So at the end, the videos are quite awful.

Also, I'd like to know what other programs would you recommend to make a quality video with images (like the one you showed a few months ago about affaires with married women), and to cut the Animoto (or whatever program) logo.

Cheers.

 

[skohh]

Cash, I've been using Animoto for a few days and let me tell you that its service is really crappy! They only let me put up to 22 words in each text module, so I have to put my KW very shortened, and use a tiny url to backlink in the video. So at the end, the videos are quite awful.

Also, I'd like to know what other programs would you recommend to make a quality video with images (like the one you showed a few months ago about affaires with married women), and to cut the Animoto (or whatever program) logo.

Cheers.

Proshow

 

[cash202]

I've started my first campaign:

1. Bukisa disapproved my article.

2. Hubpages asked for a phone number verification, then later disapproved as well. Screw them.

I've written UAW style of articles (spin every sentence 2 times so I have 3) and then handspin the crap out of every word (except the keyword) but while keeping it readable.

I even put random paragraphs, links, bold/italics, pics and everything Cash recommended in another thread of his.

And still the above two 2.0s say they're not unique.

Senuke says 16 different copies of my article with 45% uniqueness.

Can anyone please tell me what the hell I'm doing wrong?

Thanks a million Cash and everyone who has contributed.

45% in SENuke is good enough. They have their own way of calculating it.
It you put the same article to ArticleRanks, they'll show like 400%.

I've recently dropped Hubpages (too many disapprovals).

Bukisa, InfoBarrel and Qondio only for private promotions with unique
content with no links inside articles (resource box and profile promotion).

I dropped Wikispaces as well because they've launch some kind of
anti-spam campaign and ban wikis left and right.

My attitude is, if Web 2.0 site bans you all the time then I'll drop it. And if
they don't like a particular topic (like Wordpress.com and Internet
marketing) then I won't post articles on this topic.

There are plenty of Web 2.0 sites out there. There's no need to swim
against the current.

 

[cash202]

If I'm being stupid please tell me but would it not make more sense to upload the video to a hosting site that all do follow links (i.e. blip, videojug, not youtube)? Am I missing something?

You're missing the fact that YouTube is owned by Google and these videos
can rank on their own. It is very rare that I see something but YouTube on
the first page.

You're also missing the fact that do_follow/nofollow makes almost no difference
despite what so-called SEO-experts say.

I can rank a site on sheer nofollow links, no worries.

 

[cash202]

Hi Cash, thank you for the great info. The one thing that I haven't understood from any guides online, including this one, is how to promote one website with many landing pages. If you could clear this up it would be greatly appreciated. For example if the site has the following structure:

homepage .blah /landing page 1 keyword
homepage .blah /landing page 2 for another keyword
homepage .blah /landing page 3 for another keyword
homepage .blah /landing page 4 for another keyword
and so on

Would it still be ok to run keyword focused campaigns that target those landing pages for a site that has for example 20 different landing pages? If you have done this, what is your experience with this? If this is not the best way to promote a multi-landing page website, how would you approach this?

As always, your input is greatly appreciated

I recently being using the following method.

One blast per each keyword with two links, one to home page and one to
the keyword page.

20 different landing pages = 20 different blasts. Start with ones with the
most traffic and you might no even need to do that much.

 

[cash202]

Cash, I've been using Animoto for a few days and let me tell you that its service is really crappy! They only let me put up to 22 words in each text module, so I have to put my KW very shortened, and use a tiny url to backlink in the video. So at the end, the videos are quite awful.

Also, I'd like to know what other programs would you recommend to make a quality video with images (like the one you showed a few months ago about affaires with married women), and to cut the Animoto (or whatever program) logo.

Cheers.

They recently changed their user interface and turned it into shit. I hate it
now too 22 words limit was always there. Just use short phrases.

It is still OK for the purpose we use it for.

 

[plycrmla]

You're missing the fact that YouTube is owned by Google and these videos
can rank on their own. It is very rare that I see something but YouTube on
the first page.

You're also missing the fact that do_follow/nofollow makes almost no difference
despite what so-called SEO-experts say.

I can rank a site on sheer nofollow links, no worries.

Good point. In your opinion would there be any advantage to submitting the video to multiple videosites or might this be counter-productive? Appreciate all the excellent information in here!

 

[fimms]

I usually skip things that start with "What this guide is NOT about". I've seen negation too many times already, but I'm happy I didn't skip this one! Great food for making own blueprint and strategy.

 

[Expertpeon]

I recently being using the following method.

One blast per each keyword with two links, one to home page and one to
the keyword page.

20 different landing pages = 20 different blasts. Start with ones with the
most traffic and you might no even need to do that much.

I've recently done mix and match and also blasts with singular keywords.
Homepage is optimized to two keywords I was going after and inner pages optimized to other keywords
Homepage is still beating out side optimized pages.
Basically I had 4 keywords
I would do campaigns that mixed up 2 keywords (each web 2.0 had links to various random pages on the website and the homepage) both in this fashion of <keyword 1:link1> <keyword 2:link 2> etc in the same web 2.0
I'm still waiting for the results of around 15 campaigns thusly and around 10 normally

All tier links carried both keywords (thanks to AMRs new feature that allows you to embed links in the body now based upon keyphrases)

Though again each campaign was like 2-3 campaigns worth of links.
I'm curious if you can manage 2 keywords together like this... and what better way to find out
Something tells me it will make no difference at all if you do 1 keyword per web 2.0 or several as to the effectiveness...
The site has clearly gained footing already in at least one of the keyphrases managed this way, but at the same time, I just shoved 1500+ web 2.0 pyramids in this manner to the site, so I don't expect much for upwards of a month.

Also I've created at least 20 videos on youtube (just for this one site), so I just started recycling older ones back into the campaigns towards the end.
Just so you can gauge things going forward from me (I plan to update whenever I see the new SERPs). This is YSE right now (though, honestly, google has about 3 times as many high PR links showing presently for this site) 95% are d0follows all added within the last week.
Honestly there's tons more PR5> (this goes down to about link #100 even in YSE) and several PR8s but I don't have the full version of SEO spyglass and YSE sucks at showing links.

This is the site I'm currently working on (not the big money one, but still makes low 4 figs/day)
Also I'm very anxious to get my zenno poster templates completely together in the next 2 weeks, whenever my damn thesis submission deadline is finally over with