DATING SITES PROXIES?

[steppanyah]

Hello i am looking for a proxy to open high security dating site like zoosk.com, match and ourtime.com without block, i have used several proxy service and i normally get blocked instantly anybody can help put me on the right path

 

[steppanyah]

Best approach is clean mobile proxies and a good antidetect setup. Don't “create and blast”, it’lll get you flagged fast. Let the accounts rest after creation instead, browse naturally, and increase messaging slowly. It’s all about mimicking real human behavior to stay under the radar.

I have tried many anti detect with mobile proxy and still get block instantly so i am confused when you said use mobile ip + anti detect

 

[steppanyah]

Get a good mobile (4g/5g) proxy + use anti-detect software. Mobile proxies run under CGNAT (the ip address is shared by multiple clients of the ISP) so they are not usually banned because that would mean also restricting access to legitimate users.

Use 1 profile/fingerprint per each account. Always rotate/change ips when switching accounts if using one mobile proxy for multiple accounts.

I have tried many anti detect with mobile proxy and still get block instantly so i am confused when you said use mobile ip + anti detect

Appreciate all the insights in here just wanted to confirm for anyone new: if you're managing multiple dating profiles, rotating IPs with mobile proxies really does help avoid flags. I’ve tested a few setups recently and got way better retention when pairing a mobile proxy with GoLogin on Mac. Still learning the fingerprint side of things though. Anyone got tips for fine-tuning browser fingerprints specifically for dating sites?

with all this, you will still get blocked on zoosk i can assure you

 

[theusualkeysersoze]

Read some of my previous posts about dating apps and proxies and anti detect.

It's almost impossible. I can't be bothered to look up the posts, but I've made more than one. I was paid to "research" that and this goes far, far , far beyond proxies and anti detects.

To understand why that is so, you will have to pay some very time consuming and expensive lessons, seriously, just check in my post history.

To pull this off, you need to know a lot and you need serious money and infrastructure.

If you think proxy and anti detect and you're sorted, you have not even discovered 10% of what's needed.

Zoosk is confident enough all they want for sign up is an email , and to approve the account 2 images. That's it, that's all they need on the "surface".

 

[steppanyah]

s

Read some of my previous posts about dating apps and proxies and anti detect.

It's almost impossible. I can't be bothered to look up the posts, but I've made more than one. I was paid to "research" that and this goes far, far , far beyond proxies and anti detects.

To understand why that is so, you will have to pay some very time consuming and expensive lessons, seriously, just check in my post history.

To pull this off, you need to know a lot and you need serious money and infrastructure.

If you think proxy and anti detect and you're sorted, you have not even discovered 10% of what's needed.

Zoosk is confident enough all they want for sign up is an email , and to approve the account 2 images. That's it, that's all they need on the "surface".

are you saying you can open zoosk account?

 

[faster]

You can skip datacenter IPs and go with high-quality residential proxies. Tie one account to one IP + fingerprint, avoid fast actions, and let the profile age naturally after creation.

 

[steppanyah]

You can skip datacenter IPs and go with high-quality residential proxies. Tie one account to one IP + fingerprint, avoid fast actions, and let the profile age naturally after creation.

On normal browser or with anti detect?

 

[Prosox_Proxies]

With mobile proxies + mobile anti-detect software, and with proper configuration of rotation and fingerprinting, there is no chance of being detected.

 

[theusualkeysersoze]

With mobile proxies + mobile anti-detect software, and with proper configuration of rotation and fingerprinting, there is no chance of being detected.

Prove it, less talk, more actions.

s

are you saying you can open zoosk account?

The cost and effort is not worth it, it requires infrastructure beyond an off the shelf proxy and anti detect.

Everyone here who says otherwise will not be able to produce evidence.

You'd see account sellers everywhere if it were so easy.

Dating apps of the match group are extremly hard opposition/targets.

It's expensive enough to have the cheapskates who think it's easy say no thanks.

Per account cost is hard to tell, the initial software and some hardware setup is what costs much.

The people here don't read and just post bs replies.

They'll all learn that zoosk etc all check image data very very closely. They check proxies and device identity very closely.

There's much more. Very expensive to pull off.

 

[steppanyah]

I agree

The cost and effort is not worth it, it requires infrastructure beyond an off the shelf proxy and anti detect.

Everyone here who says otherwise will not be able to produce evidence.

You'd see account sellers everywhere if it were so easy.

Dating apps of the match group are extremly hard opposition/targets.

It's expensive enough to have the cheapskates who think it's easy say no thanks.

Per account cost is hard to tell, the initial software and some hardware setup is what costs much.

The people here don't read and just post bs replies.

They'll all learn that zoosk etc all check image data very very closely. They check proxies and device identity very closely.

There's much more. Very expensive to pull off

The cost and effort is not worth it, it requires infrastructure beyond an off the shelf proxy and anti detect.

Everyone here who says otherwise will not be able to produce evidence.

You'd see account sellers everywhere if it were so easy.

Dating apps of the match group are extremly hard opposition/targets.

It's expensive enough to have the cheapskates who think it's easy say no thanks.

Per account cost is hard to tell, the initial software and some hardware setup is what costs much.

The people here don't read and just post bs replies.

They'll all learn that zoosk etc all check image data very very closely. They check proxies and device identity very closely.

There's much more. Very expensive to pull off.

I agree with you bro.. zoosk is hard as well to created account without been blocked after a while

 

[steppanyah]

With mobile proxies + mobile anti-detect software, and with proper configuration of rotation and fingerprinting, there is no chance of being detected.

hmmm which anti detect software you talking about, i have used bunch of them with mobile proxy like you said, it's same result..

 

[theusualkeysersoze]

hmmm which anti detect software you talking about, i have used bunch of them with mobile proxy like you said, it's same result..

I really, really appreciate a new member not participating in speculation without trying, I can tell you have tried, so I will say what is required, since you deserve it. Unfortunatelly, it requires something almost as good as going vs cashiers and such...

In general, while Zoosk is not asking, the other 40 brands are asking and this is a big problem, you need a real SIM , voip will not cut it, and that SIM should be in the area of where your proxy is, yes, it should. The dumb voip sim providers do not realize that plenty of fish and tinder have the same database and share insights across brands, so these imbeciles will give me a number on POF that they have given to you on Tinder, aka, we both get banned, match runs 40 brands, you can imagine the bans cause by just this. So yeah, real SIM not seen on any of these platforms before, prepaid real SIMs somehow also get flagged, so yeah, if you wanna do it right, you need a sim card for the target country.

Images!

I have never imagined any platform would ever, ever do deep inspection on images, but boy was I wrong. The reason is , scammers from economically challenged countries who cannot find a real job used to sign up as 65 year old, rich and almost dead. Catfishing impersonations etc.
And well a top 3 friend owns such a dating platform and the owers know eachothers personally and they talk about these things in private. So the do image reverse searches, exif is looked at and nope just taking a screenshot is not enough, deleting exif data is an auto flag etc etc, so you need real images with the corresponding exif data. Ever realized the proilfe only get views after the images have been approved? Takes like 5 minutes or so, this is where the second wave of check happens.

Proxies!

Mobile proxies, you say? I will not even go there, there are vast vast data brokers which can tell you which IP is knows proxy, between how many machines its been rotated(why would a res proxy have been used by 50 machines?) etcetc. So you need a dedicated static isp proxy never seen before on the web in the location of choice, the subnet also cannot have contaminated or known proxies, so thatll be hard to find. Oh and yeah, you want the correct DNS settings on these, too.
Or you can roll your own proxies, everyone who did so will be able to tell you how much "fun" that is. Or you can buy a real router, in the name of a company, but that will require a dedicated location. Or you can get Starlink, these are very good for this, but mister musk charges 200 usd per month and 600 for the hardware.

Anti detect, might might work if you find a provider which consistently produces very little noise on canvas settings, which do not drift over sessions etc. Or you rent a Windows Hetzner server(yes, not a rubbish one, one with font packs, audio drivers and GPU) , run an anti detect on that thing and RDP into that. This makes life easier, cost roughly 300 usd pcm, just the server. Or you run something like VectorT13 which will spawn very good Windows instances from a VB(not VM). Complicated to set up, and if you see their pricing, you will peepee from your ears. And they still need a real good proxy. And this anti detect requires almost a real server to run undetected.

So THIS is what it takes.
If you all do not have that, do not follow the "advice" of the prople here who say it is just a proxy matter lmfao, you will be doing the community and the proxy environment a disfavor by having more IPs flagged.

I am not particularly some sort of superman, I just happen to be a dev , have worked in IT and was lucky enough to be paid to explore this highly interesting field.

And yes, I totally do speak on a personal basis with a handful of anti detect tech teams.

Thanks for the contribution. Any idea on how to use antidetect setup on MAC?

If you have a MAC that has been made before 2020, you have an almost perfect tool for multi accounting as far hardware is concerned.
You still need to know to set up the anti detect, the good proxies, images and sims, though.

 

[Cliff Hacher]

There are too many websites which provide free proxies but I recommend you to use paid ones becuz they are good for what you looking for

 

[trueplayer]

Hello i am looking for a proxy to open high security dating site like zoosk.com, match and ourtime.com without block, i have used several proxy service and i normally get blocked instantly anybody can help put me on the right path

@steppanyah you are getting blocked because proxy + antidetect is like 30% of the puzzle - Zoosk/Match correlate image hashes, signup behavior timing, SIM history + device entropy across sessions///

Mobile IP alone won’t save you if images were ever reused, SIM touched another Match property, or you rush post-signup actions. When people say it works they usually mean 1-2 accounts for testing, not repeatable scale with longevity..

For scale you need real local SIMs, never-seen images, long idle after creation + boring human behavior - othrwise you’re just burning proxies

 

[steppanyah]

@steppanyah you are getting blocked because proxy + antidetect is like 30% of the puzzle - Zoosk/Match correlate image hashes, signup behavior timing, SIM history + device entropy across sessions///

Mobile IP alone won’t save you if images were ever reused, SIM touched another Match property, or you rush post-signup actions. When people say it works they usually mean 1-2 accounts for testing, not repeatable scale with longevity..

For scale you need real local SIMs, never-seen images, long idle after creation + boring human behavior - othrwise you’re just burning proxies

Ok thanks

 

[steppanyah]

I really, really appreciate a new member not participating in speculation without trying, I can tell you have tried, so I will say what is required, since you deserve it. Unfortunatelly, it requires something almost as good as going vs cashiers and such...

In general, while Zoosk is not asking, the other 40 brands are asking and this is a big problem, you need a real SIM , voip will not cut it, and that SIM should be in the area of where your proxy is, yes, it should. The dumb voip sim providers do not realize that plenty of fish and tinder have the same database and share insights across brands, so these imbeciles will give me a number on POF that they have given to you on Tinder, aka, we both get banned, match runs 40 brands, you can imagine the bans cause by just this. So yeah, real SIM not seen on any of these platforms before, prepaid real SIMs somehow also get flagged, so yeah, if you wanna do it right, you need a sim card for the target country.

Images!

I have never imagined any platform would ever, ever do deep inspection on images, but boy was I wrong. The reason is , scammers from economically challenged countries who cannot find a real job used to sign up as 65 year old, rich and almost dead. Catfishing impersonations etc.
And well a top 3 friend owns such a dating platform and the owers know eachothers personally and they talk about these things in private. So the do image reverse searches, exif is looked at and nope just taking a screenshot is not enough, deleting exif data is an auto flag etc etc, so you need real images with the corresponding exif data. Ever realized the proilfe only get views after the images have been approved? Takes like 5 minutes or so, this is where the second wave of check happens.

Proxies!

Mobile proxies, you say? I will not even go there, there are vast vast data brokers which can tell you which IP is knows proxy, between how many machines its been rotated(why would a res proxy have been used by 50 machines?) etcetc. So you need a dedicated static isp proxy never seen before on the web in the location of choice, the subnet also cannot have contaminated or known proxies, so thatll be hard to find. Oh and yeah, you want the correct DNS settings on these, too.
Or you can roll your own proxies, everyone who did so will be able to tell you how much "fun" that is. Or you can buy a real router, in the name of a company, but that will require a dedicated location. Or you can get Starlink, these are very good for this, but mister musk charges 200 usd per month and 600 for the hardware.

Anti detect, might might work if you find a provider which consistently produces very little noise on canvas settings, which do not drift over sessions etc. Or you rent a Windows Hetzner server(yes, not a rubbish one, one with font packs, audio drivers and GPU) , run an anti detect on that thing and RDP into that. This makes life easier, cost roughly 300 usd pcm, just the server. Or you run something like VectorT13 which will spawn very good Windows instances from a VB(not VM). Complicated to set up, and if you see their pricing, you will peepee from your ears. And they still need a real good proxy. And this anti detect requires almost a real server to run undetected.

So THIS is what it takes.
If you all do not have that, do not follow the "advice" of the prople here who say it is just a proxy matter lmfao, you will be doing the community and the proxy environment a disfavor by having more IPs flagged.

I am not particularly some sort of superman, I just happen to be a dev , have worked in IT and was lucky enough to be paid to explore this highly interesting field.

And yes, I totally do speak on a personal basis with a handful of anti detect tech teams.

In summary what do suggest ?

 

[theusualkeysersoze]

In summary what do suggest ?

That's up to you, if you believe it's worth thousands of dollars in infrastructure and knowledge and time to run a couple dozen dating accounts, that's what it's going to take.

Hard to monetize, that's the point of anti fraud measures. Without all the above, I wouldn't even try, it really just will not work.

 

[Prosox_Proxies]

hmmm which anti detect software you talking about, i have used bunch of them with mobile proxy like you said, it's same result..

Try Geelark. It’s not an emulator, it’s real phone hardware

 

[Prosox_Proxies]

Prove it, less talk, more actions.

What’s there to prove? Hop into any OTC group and see what software they use to sell ready-made payment accounts for example

 

[theusualkeysersoze]

What’s there to prove? Hop into any OTC group and see what software they use to sell ready-made payment accounts for example

Everything to prove, you go and show a video of you having 5 active accounts open at the same time.

Less talk, more actions.