RealDaddy
Repeatedly violating rules
- Jun 30, 2018
- 9,011
- 11,300
Or late ThanksgivingWhat about the New year gift?![]()
Or late ThanksgivingWhat about the New year gift?![]()
If Google had its way, it'd be releasing an update every day of the year.Or late Thanksgiving![]()
Depends on how you use it.Avoid any manipulation and tampering. AI is amazing
I believe it has something to do with the backlinks expecially from guestpost / sponsored.I guess you are not cheap with you bl's. So, what do you think hit it?
YupThis update also favour authority site even more rather than its relevancy / e.a.t
I have often wondered if Google really does enjoy scaring webmasters. I think sometimes they announce updates that do not really exist because they know just by saying "we are launching an update to crack down on XYZ" a percentage of webmasters will change their behavior and tactics even though Google did nothing at all except say they were doing something.If Google had its way, it'd be releasing an update every day of the year.Just for the fun of it and for scaring webmasters.
MaybeI have often wondered if Google really does enjoy scaring webmasters. I think sometimes they announce updates that do not really exist because they know just by saying "we are launching an update to crack down on XYZ" a percentage of webmasters will change their behavior and tactics even though Google did nothing at all except say they were doing something.
So building even more backlinks - just higher quality ones?I believe it has something to do with the backlinks expecially from guestpost / sponsored.
This update also favour authority site even more rather than its relevancy / e.a.t
I would think it would ignore backlinks vs penalizing a site. It's impossible to tell who did the backlinks and if a penalty actually got applied then negative SEO becomes a big thing. At that point it all becomes a mess, google has tons more links to try to process, and overall SERP quality suffers.How the algo will neutralize the effect? By deindexing spam link or by algo penalty to the money site?
It could be trueI have often wondered if Google really does enjoy scaring webmasters. I think sometimes they announce updates that do not really exist because they know just by saying "we are launching an update to crack down on XYZ" a percentage of webmasters will change their behavior and tactics even though Google did nothing at all except say they were doing something.
Don't index your backlink unless you want to get a slap on the wrist from google. They only need to be crawled to get the juice. Google doesn't want spam backlinks to show on the serps and they will remove a lot if you force index them when they don't need to be.One site went from 4500$ a month to 12$
Great Christmas present
I don't know if it was the AI Content or the tier 2 spam links that got it. Maybe it was the indexers (only used on tier 1+2)
From what I am seeing Google is going squarely after AI or AI-like content even in this update.One site went from 4500$ a month to 12$
Great Christmas present
I don't know if it was the AI Content or the tier 2 spam links that got it. Maybe it was the indexers (only used on tier 1+2)
First guy who is happy about iti can see traffic increase on my websites . update is good