Tried the service and here are my observations-
Initial NY location observation-
-browserleaks doesnt open
-Using socks5 protocol via
proxifier- leaks DNS in chrome, doesn't support webrtc resolution (it is blank)
-Using OpenVPN config via
OpenVPN- still leaking actual DNS in browsers, webrtc support is there but webrtc IP is different than public IP(mismatch). hence proxy usage is detected
-In both usage- Tunnelling is also detected
2nd different location ovservation-
-browserleaks does open
-Using socks5 protocol via
proxifier- leaks DNS in chrome, doesn't support webrtc resolution (it is blank)
-Using OpenVPN config via
OpenVPN- not leaking actual DNS in browsers only proxy DNS showing, webrtc support is there and matches public IP. hence proxy usage is
not detected.
-OpenVPN connected via UDPv4 protocol and everything looks good
In both usage- Tunnelling is
not detected.
-TCP IP fingerprinting shows Fuzzy alongside windows 10NT that i spoofed in panel. I think this is not good as my real machine on real connection does not show fuzzy by the TCP Fingerprint.
I think spoofing is detected here.
Initial proxy of NY lacked UDP support and got detected as proxy and tunnel
2nd proxy of different location support UDP via openVPN and did not get detected as proxy and/or tunnel
IP change be it for any location is quick, IPs are all clean and non abused
I would like to speak to Thread owner and tech admin of
@mobilehop to discuss more about these