Need your recommendation about host

kevin aka

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2019
Messages
191
Reaction score
69
Hello guys, i've been using Siteground hosting for a while, but I've found that it's too expensive for me. I'm considering switching to Namecheap VPS hosting. Do you think this is a good decision? If is it which plan you recommend for
Screenshot_20221108_191835.jpg
Screenshot_20221108_191824.jpg
Screenshot_20221108_191809.jpg
starting websites with not much traffic.
 
Try sharing traffic stats of your website and also the how much content you have on website.

Because migration can make and break things. So its good to keep things in mind.

Although namecheap vps are cheap but i don't see much positive reviews of them and not much people are recommending them as well. But that is part of your test.
 
Try sharing traffic stats of your website and also the how much content you have on website.

Because migration can make and break things. So its good to keep things in mind.

Although namecheap vps are cheap but i don't see much positive reviews of them and not much people are recommending them as well. But that is part of your test.
Not much traffic yet as you can see in the image. And my site got hit with Google updates so no problem if I lose some rank while I transfer it. I'm in tight situation and siteground is expensive a bit.
Screenshot_20221108_194132.jpg
 
You have already good advices , but if you will not test you will never know ,maybe it will work better for you .Good luck
 
Cloudways in an option maybe?
Hello thanks for your recommendation, but I think it little bit expensive for me. However, I could afford this plan but I don't know if could handle a recipe website with 1,000 visitors per month and a lot of pictures.
Screenshot_20221109-105931.jpg
 
Hello thanks for your recommendation, but I think it little bit expensive for me. However, I could afford this plan but I don't know if could handle a recipe website with 1,000 visitors per month and a lot of pictures.View attachment 231913
If your skeptical what could work for you. Try any that offer free trial.

I'm using shared hosting with @DamoHG - Hostgnome.com has litespeed web server. I have tons of images on this shared host and high traffic. It worked well so far for me. They have a free trial too for a limited time
 
I could afford this plan but I don't know if could handle a recipe website with 1,000 visitors per month and a lot of pictures
Cloudways Vultr High Frequency for $13 will handle 1000 visitors per day with ease if you built it right, not a problem at all.
 
Cloudways Vultr High Frequency for $13 will handle 1000 visitors per day with ease if you built it right, not a problem at all.
Thanks a lot for suggestions, I will go with vultr cuz I read some good reviews about it.
 
If your skeptical what could work for you. Try any that offer free trial.

I'm using shared hosting with @DamoHG - Hostgnome.com has litespeed web server. I have tons of images on this shared host and high traffic. It worked well so far for me. They have a free trial too for a limited time
Thank you a lot man
 
Thanks a lot for suggestions, I will go with vultr cuz I read some good reviews about it.
And if your site explodes in traffic, you can always add the Cloudflare Enterprise CDN add-on for $4.95 to it that they offer .. =)
 
And if your site explodes in traffic, you can always add the Cloudflare Enterprise CDN add-on for $4.95 to it that they offer .. =)
Thank you for your help I really appreciate it, my site isn't very big, but I still work hard on it. I hope in the future I can achieve some good results.
 
Actually, your site stats does not show any need for a vps by itself, unless you are planning on running few more sites on it.

A shared hosting might be in place for this.

If you must, Vultr gives good options, extremely fast, many locations and it is very stable.

Good luck!
 
SiteGround has become notorious in forcing the customers to always upgrade to the upper plans. I was their long-time customer from 2012 to 2020. In the last few years they started to use tactics like CPU seconds limit exceeded and ask the customer to upgrade to the VPS if he is on shared plans, after upgrading to VPS they don't stop and even force you to now move to dedicated plans because of vague reasons.

I'd suggest Cloudways, here's the traffic stat from one of my all the other sites I'm hosting with them.

cqFIUktBdy.png
 
SiteGround has become notorious in forcing the customers to always upgrade to the upper plans. I was their long-time customer from 2012 to 2020. In the last few years they started to use tactics like CPU seconds limit exceeded and ask the customer to upgrade to the VPS if he is on shared plans, after upgrading to VPS they don't stop and even force you to now move to dedicated plans because of vague reasons.

I'd suggest Cloudways, here's the traffic stat from one of my all the other sites I'm hosting with them.

View attachment 232041
Thanks a lot I was thinking to go with vultr but I find some difficulties to transfer my websites. So I may choose cloudways
 
T
Actually, your site stats does not show any need for a vps by itself, unless you are planning on running few more sites on it.

A shared hosting might be in place for this.

If you must, Vultr gives good options, extremely fast, many locations and it is very stable.

Good luck
Thanks man
 
Thanks a lot I was thinking to go with vultr but I find some difficulties to transfer my websites. So I may choose cloudways
Vultr is unmanaged cloud hosting, it is best for those who have an excellent server side management experience.
Cloudways supports 5 services you can deploy your hosting on, Digitalocean, Vultr, linode, AWS and Google CloudPlatform.
 
Back
Top