I've got some good news and bad news.
First, the bad news .
Just because you published many pieces of content doesn't mean that you're guaranteed to make a certain amount of money per month.
There are no guarantees in this game.
Also, even if you published a lot of content, it doesn't mean that many of them will rank well enough for you to get a decent traffic volume every month.
There are a lot of variables at play.
Here are some of the questions I need you to wrap your head around:
How long are your articles?
How engaging are your articles?
How optimized are your articles?
Are your articles written based on your competitors' content, or are you making stuff up?
Are you talking about themes that are in demand in your niche?
Are you targeting "low-hanging" fruit, themes and topics, and keywords?
Do you set up your website so that when people find themselves on one page, they are more likely to click another page?
These are the kinds of questions that you need to answer the right way to get 1,000 dollars a month.
There is no fixed formula .
Some publishers have very few pieces of content.
I know a very successful site with only 45 pieces of content, but based on their traffic volume and the Amazon products they're selling, they're clearing more than 1,000 dollars a month.
On the flip side, I also know many sites with lots of pages but very little traffic.
Don't think that having many articles means you're entitled to make a certain amount of cash; it doesn't work that way.
Now, the good news is there is some correlation .
Please understand that there is a big difference between a correlation and a necessary result.
The stuff discussed above involves necessary results, meaning you are entitled to getting B if you do A.
It doesn't work that way, but there is a correlation.
According to the guys behind Income School or Project 24 , you can expect a certain range of income if you have a certain number of articles.
They're shooting in the dark, so some of it sounds like they're pulling figures out of their ass, but generally speaking, they're on point.
So understand that if you have a high number of the right type of articles, you are more likely to generate decent cash.
That's the bottom line.
The good news is if you're looking for volume, it doesn't have to cost you an arm and a leg.
There are many high-quality writers here in the forum, and you can go that route, but it could be expensive.
If you want to save money or don't have money, the cheaper alternative is to write outlines of the stuff that you've researched.
Make sure that the outlines are based on the keywords you're targeting.
Then get in front of a microphone and talk away.
Basically, look at the outline to jog your memory.
And as you talk about what you've learned and put it in tight, compelling sentences, you're cranking out blog after blog.
People use dictaphone blogging to crank out 25,000 words to 80,000 words a day.
If they can do it, nothing is stopping you from getting the same results.
Dictablogging works , but you have to be disciplined.
You have to stick with it for some time.
Also, it helps to invest in high-quality manual transcribers.
The downside to using software for audio transcription is that you have to dictate punctuation to the software, which can throw off your line of thought.
Remember, the name of the game is to talk as quickly as possible so you can create a huge amount of content in no time flat.
