Is the Internet dying?

bartosimpsonio

Elite Member
Executive VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
24,772
Reaction score
31,555
Website access is becoming appliance access.

Few large companies control 99% of online traffic.

Social networks are 99% noise.

Getting a new site seen takes months. Unless you spend big $, just like in traditional media.

There is no longer much difference between the Internet and traditional media. Large corps have taken over.

People no longer run their own blogs, they just publish on Facebook or Twitter. There is no grass roots publishing any more.

Sites are all standardized to Google's specs. No longer can a crazy site from Geocities appear anywhere on serps. Sites all look pretty much the same, produced to suit one corporation's demands.

The Internet I knew in the 1990's is dead already. But the question is, is the larger Internet dying for individuals and becoming a communications network for large corporation's applications?

Smart phones, smart TV's, websites running as applications in these devices, people accessing these using a TV remote control instead of a keyboard. Only content published by individuals is on Twitter or FB using their phones (very limited).

Basically we've gone back to large media. Individuals no longer yield any power on the Internet. It's been that way for a long time, but I've come to realize this more clearly recently.

We're all working for a few large corporations online. Those who get into the Internet today have no idea how free we were in the 1990's.

A handful of large corps coordinate the Internet. You only get seen if you shine through on their proprietary platforms. Individuals are gone. No independent search engine exists, no competitor to Google exists in fact, Facebook and Twitter command a large fraction of the rest of traffic. Amazon and a couple of others take the rest of the traffic.

The Internet as we knew it is dying or is already dead. It's now a closed system run by a few corporations, a lot like AOL and Prodigy were back in the day.
 
I know people who just don't bother looking at the internet, they just ask a speaker. I personally don't search when buying, I just use the amazon app on my phone.
 
The main problem is there is a lot of competition .. kids now days they all want to do IM
 
A lot of things have changed for sure. Something that worked in 2010 will no longer be that fruitful now.
 
But a lot of people still make $3,000+ per day on the internet. Doesn't seem dead to me

Oh, as far as income I guess most of us here make a living from it. That's not what I'm talking about.

I'm saying we're making money inside a closed system run by a few corporations.

Where do you make these $3000? Probably inside Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Twitter or a combination of these.

This is a lot like AOL was meant to be. Closed, proprietary online access controlled by a handful of corps.

That's not what the Internet was meant to be. At all.

We were supposed to be running decentralized things, where everyone had power, like having your own servers at home running your own email and stuff. Not everyone using Gmail or other centralized email.

We were supposed to have tens of search systems, P2P search systems, not one company deciding what everyone sees or doesn't see.

"The cloud" is mainframe computing again. Centralized. It's what computers were like in the 1970's before the PC.

We're all enclosed in a proprietary network run by 5 or 6 people. Think about that.

We don't use "the Internet" at all. The Internet was supposed to be much bigger and free (as in freedom).
 
Last edited:
As I see it, in the future everything might just merge so we don't really have a reason to "google" anymore.

Just ask a voice assistant and you'll have your solution.

I agree with most of your points regarding the fact that we progressively have less freedom on the Internet.

And by freedom I mean the fact that you can't really do much of your own, we're just not signed employers of bigger companies that give us no fixed salary or any conditions, one mistake and we're out :).
We just have to comply with their conditions and hope to get some of the crumbs that remain.

Best Regards,
Jaymien.
 
No, It's thriving.
 
I can't disagree with any of your points. I remember the joy of booting up dial up in 1995 as a kid typing away in DOS and plugging floppy disks.

I never knew a world without the internet in that sense but have been online professionally and socially for majority of my life; it has changed a lot for sure. Internet has given birth to so many things and connected us all here today, I wouldn't say it's dead but evolved and has become a pillar of modern age tech.

Sure we give up alot of privacy but I believe the information age is only starting. Maybe we have a different view on what the internet is, as I think it's only starting and will take on my forms in the future that bring opportunity for grassroots and everyday people of the world again and again.
 
No, It's thriving.

I doubt that's what @bartosimpsonio was pointing at.

Yes, the Internet is thriving and I'm confident that everyone (and I mean everyone) in the world will have access to the web within the next 5-10 years.

Additionally, being able to access it pretty much from any device.

That's not the point though, notwithstanding the immense success, what we're discussing here is the fact that Internet, as we know, is dead as it's already way too centralized and also that there's probably no way to recover from this.

Best Regards,
Jaymien.
 
Oh, as far as income I guess most of us here make a living from it. That's not what I'm talking about.

I'm saying we're making money inside a closed system run by a few corporations.

Where do you make these $3000? Probably inside Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Twitter or a combination of these.

This is a lot like AOL was meant to be. Closed, proprietary online access controlled by a handful of corps.

That's not what the Internet was meant to be. At all.

We were supposed to be running decentralized things, where everyone had power, like having your own servers at home running your own email and stuff. Not everyone using Gmail or other centralized email.

We were supposed to have tens of search systems, P2P search systems, not one company deciding what everyone sees or doesn't see.

"The cloud" is mainframe computing again. Centralized. It's what computers were like in the 1970's before the PC.

We're all enclosed in a proprietary network run by 5 or 6 people. Think about that.

We don't use "the Internet" at all. The Internet was supposed to be much bigger and free (as in freedom).

Good emphasis on gmail, it even scares me sometimes when I think how many private mails are being kept at one company.
 
I doubt that's what @bartosimpsonio was pointing at.

Yes, the Internet is thriving and I'm confident that everyone (and I mean everyone) in the world will have access to the web within the next 5-10 years.

Additionally, being able to access it pretty much from any device.

That's not the point though, notwithstanding the immense success, what we're discussing here is the fact that Internet, as we know, is dead as it's already way too centralized and also that there's probably no way to recover from this.

Best Regards,
Jaymien.
We can Say the same for tv, printed press etc. It's just old people's nostalgia.
 
Back
Top