Back Link Diagram Tutorial

[olm75]

for my blogs i make the theme keyword the name of the blog, use the category keywords for the other pages and make articles on them then i get the long and semantic tail derivative keywords in the articles and for tags

 

[olm75]

Michigan how in the hell you find your markets thats the #s i need now i guess i need patience my blogs are getting to the 1st and 2cd pages in google fairly quick, but let me ask you how do you choose your markets, maybe im in a dead market but i do alot of research b4 i start the market... i have been trying to get my spokes of my main link wheel ranked high too

 

[MichiganManiac]

jvmarket, can you give us an example of a site/keywords you ranked well using those methods?

Dude...you don't think he's going to dime out his money site and an entire blog network do you?

I was surprised that he showed one of the sites he's beginning work on in those videos...but then again I doubt the Google police are watching every video that shows up on every IM forum worldwide.

 

[tata668]

Dude...you don't think he's going to dime out his money site and an entire blog network do you?

I was surprised that he showed one of the sites he's beginning work on in those videos...but then again I doubt the Google police are watching every video that shows up on every IM forum worldwide.

The problem is that it would be nice to see if it really works. I did some kind of linkwheels in the past and I've never had that much success using them.

 

[olm75]

i just gotta ask i am using blogs instead of minisites, and i am noticing that yahoo takes longer than google to rank my blogs. and also i wanted to ask when doing linkwheel for blogs is it better to do a linkwheel for the subpages which are your catergory keywords so ex: if you have 3-5keywords in your campaign should i do 1 linkwheel for main keyword and 3-5 linkwheels for the category keywords...

 

[jvmarket]

The aim is not to get your subwheels or 2.0 sites high in the search engines. The purpose of his linking technique is to leverage the authority of the web 2.0 sites (subwheels) to boost his own web site (money page) in the search engines. The subwheels don't have to rank high in order to be successful, they just need to pass link juice on to one of your main sites.

I disagree....we get lots of traffic from the web 2.o sites.

Imagine if you own 18 of the top 20 results for a given keyword. We get all the traffic to either our content published on web 2.0 sites or our money sites.

The trick is to convert the traffic fro the web 2.0 sites to your money site.


On a side note....if you expect to see huge results in 30 days you will be disappointed most of the time. On a few occasions we have had good results with in a couple days but most of the time it takes a little while to get the money site ranked well...until it ranks well you get traffic from the web 2.0 sites.

We shoot for a 10% ctr from our web 2.0 properties to the money site...if that is not the case we tweak the resource box to improve the call to action.

j

 

[jvmarket]

jvmarket, can you give us an example of a site/keywords you ranked well using those methods? Thanks!

No....

 

[olm75]

this is what i was thinking i am trying to get all my web 2.0 sites ranked wellthis is the point of google domination so you can get trinkle down traffic thats comes from the other positions on the first even 2cd page...

 

[tata668]

No....

I had to try. Thanks anyway for all your advices.

 

[jvmarket]

The problem is that it would be nice to see if it really works. I did some kind of linkwheels in the past and I've never had that much success using them.

linkwheels are just part of the equations...monetizing the money site has a lot to do with it.

j

 

[jvmarket]

question for all reading this thread:

Would it be worth $50 for our process on how we build a site...the tools we use for creating the link wheel...tracking the articles and maybe a video and pdf tutorial on the exact process?

The reason I asked is that I've had some inquiries about putting together something like that.

If enough people show an interest I may go ahead and put it together.

Thanks for your thoughts on this.

j

 

[armin64]

Do any of you guys cover your tracks by inserting links to "trusted" sites mixed in with the other links?

I mean...if you were building a blog farm driving link juice to your "Mountain Bike" website, would you insert links to manufacturer websites like "Trek" or "Mongoose" or whatever?

I was thinking that if any of your blog elements just linked to the one or two sites in your chart it would be easy to see a pattern. Linking to "authority sites" in your niche might see more natural.

Of course, this would dillute the link juice going to YOUR links on any page that contained links to the authority site...so maybe it wouldn't make sense? Or maybe you would link out to other sites every third post?

Michigan unlike what many think outbound links with appropriate anchor text to what you called Authority Sites are of benefit to your SERPs positioning.
I've remembered once a guy at another forum tested it and linked to number 2 result in the serps using the anchor text with the KW he was testing on, a couple of weeks later he was number 10 out of over 2 million.

Considering what Micallef said about Web2.0s juices, which is absolutely true, and the recent death of Nofollow attribute as a common method of PageRank Sculpting, you can lead the juice in your direction by adding additional outbound links to main site pages. So I think, occasionally it would be great to add one or two other outbound links to "authority sites" within a random Web2.0 property, this way you can definitely make the whole process a bit more complicated for google.

 

[armin64]

OK....these videos ramble a bit because I kept getting distracted but I think they may spread a little light on what we do. Anyway here are two 5 miin videos on some of our processes...remember we constantly modifying what we do...

video 1

video 2

http://screencast.com/t/VL4z8GHuN

I forgot to thank you JV for all the helps, it took you so much time to answer people here in this thread. :tee:

Thanks

 

[CasinoJack]

u know the hardest problem i am running into is getting enough traffic to make sales...

Best quote ever....Should be on front page!!

 

[olm75]

i am directing most of the traffic to my money page which is the home page of my blog...
dont know maybe its to early and i need to get higher in the SERPs, but in the meantime i guess im going to do some social marketing...

 

[tata668]

question for all reading this thread:

Would it be worth $50 for our process on how we build a site...the tools we use for creating the link wheel...tracking the articles and maybe a video and pdf tutorial on the exact process?

The reason I asked is that I've had some inquiries about putting together something like that.

If enough people show an interest I may go ahead and put it together.

Thanks for your thoughts on this.

j

Well, if you charge money, then it would definitely require some proofs.

 

[theguru68]

Do you just have the "feeder" blog running invisibly behind the main blog to pump up spider attracting content? And then does this mean that it has (basically) no other use? Thanks!

 

[jvmarket]

Do you just have the "feeder" blog running invisibly behind the main blog to pump up spider attracting content? And then does this mean that it has (basically) no other use? Thanks!

Great question...nice to see some of what we are talking about is making its way to the surface.

1. spiders are a big part of the reason for the auto generated content (autoblogs) if you don't fully understand this trust me...it's important.

2. auto generated content can rank for a number of keywords that you may never thing of...that = traffic.

3. we use a program that creates anchor text links in the feed blog that points back to the money site

all of it is part of the puzzle.

Dont neglect your rss feeds either

 

[jvmarket]

Well, if you charge money, then it would definitely require some proofs.

Not really....if you are not comfortable purchasing without proof then I would suggest not purchasing.

I dont make it a habit showing what we make or what we rank for.

Either the info is worth the price or its not....thats for each to decide.

But thank you for the input.

j

 

[tata668]

Not really....if you are not comfortable purchasing without proof then I would suggest not purchasing.

I dont make it a habit showing what we make or what we rank for.

Either the info is worth the price or its not....thats for each to decide.

But thank you for the input.

j

I'm only saying that you would sell a lot more of that "method" if you could give a ranking website as an example.

If you are very comfortable with your method, you could start a website/keywords only to show it's working well, don't you?