Can't post links or screenshots because of limitations on the new account here, otherwise i would.
"Luckily i didnt invest - this way i could save some money. Thats true."
Yea that was your thought process exactly and that's why you're a scammer even if it's hard for you to understand for whatever reason. I told you that 100bb swings are normal or possible and now you're acting like i pressed buttons without any thought and lost on purpose (makes sense for a winningplayer right).
At least you were able to write down what your intention was afterall.
Hannes stated that we could agree on a stop-loss where i would move down. This was obviously more meant for 30/60. 15/30 is almost equal to 10/20 because of it's better rake structure. Whatever we never agreed on anything regarding that, it was just a thought of Hannes and not you and you didn't respond to that. Besides that where would you want me to move to? 5/10 with 4bb/100 rake? You have no idea about the game like i already mentioned, none.
"after i saw a few questionable moves - i wanted to ask him anyways for the handhistory"
You didn't ask me after any moves, you asked me after i told you that i lost it so you could look for excuses to make a run.
I still don't get it. You don't understand the game and yet you keep trying to judge on my play. It's not possible for you, no matter how hard you try. It's like if i would walk over to a doctor and tell him how he has to do his stuff, just retarded.
"GoRushbhw: du wirst schon das richtige finden" - that's you stating that you would trust me to do the right thing. I did the right thing and it went as bad as it could, unluckily, yet the swing was something that was able to happen even without bad play.
"I AM 100% sure that you would have lost 50k that day"
What? Could you exaggerate any more? I dropped 130BB, 100BB swings are normal, it was more because of the higher variance of 1on1.
"THe handhistory is proof enough"
I even posted the handhistory on 2+2 myself because it was kind of a joke how bad i was running and not how i was playing.
"You clearly are an addict gambler"
yea clearly an addict(rofl) gambler that one of the top3 backers invested into me two times and made decent profits both times. I started out with a similiar swing there btw. but guess what? He didn't cry and accused me of being an addict gambler and just resent and we made our money in the long run - and that's what poker is about, the long run.
I'm not sure why i posted all of this while you already claimed that your intention was scamming after you've seen the losses. You made it up like i was playing bad and played out of the range of our agreement which all wasn't the case but in the end you're just what you are, a thief.