DarkMailer versions

glblack · #1 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 05:18 PM

Hi, I need some help to choose which version of DarkMailer use:

I have DarkMailer 2.0, DM super 3.12, FastMailer 7.01i. (all downloaded from this forum, except FastMailer downloaded from a .torrent)

They all look identical, but DarkMailer 2.0 seems to have newer file and dll dating back to late 2004.

Which one is really the newer, safer, better version

?

Bye

garr12 · #2 (**permalink**) 10-04-2008, 03:19 AM

fastmailer is the newest and it has things changed because the old versions have footprints

**Laser** · #3 (**permalink**) 10-06-2008, 02:06 AM

do you know how to write headers?

This is vital.

**forgot** · #4 (**permalink**) 10-06-2008, 01:40 PM

People can come to know about your ip address.

glblack · #5 (**permalink**) 10-06-2008, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laser

do you know how to write headers? This is vital.

This is not a problem...

Quote:

Originally Posted by forgot

People can come to know about your ip address.

Yes, who said that I want to use DarkMailer to spam

Can someone tell me something about all those DM versions?

arvo · #6 (**permalink**) 10-07-2008, 03:02 AM

Not a single one is clean. FastMailer is probably the best of them, but again, none of those are clean. Run them on a box you could care less about.

Harm1 · #7 (**permalink**) 10-12-2008, 08:34 AM

Actually, Fastmailer 7.01i and DM 1.38 are clean. the others one's either have trojans or bugs like when mailing you'll start sending blanks. Although nowadays most domains require SPF so i would use direct sendsafe or php mailer. you can still get by with FM & peas but not good as results mang