Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

Link Licious   HostWinds

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 45 of 85
Brace yourself guys, EMDs are going to take another hit. https://twitter.com/mattcutts/status/251784203597910016...
  1. #1
    xenter's Avatar
    xenter is offline Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    262
    Reputation
    16
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked 33 Times in 27 Posts

    Default Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Brace yourself guys, EMDs are going to take another hit.

    https://twitter.com/mattcutts/status/251784203597910016

  2. #2
    hotguy640's Avatar
    hotguy640 is offline Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Nepal, KTM
    Posts
    415
    Reputation
    18
    Thanks
    140
    Thanked 44 Times in 40 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    SO, sadddd

  3. #3
    davids355's Avatar
    davids355 is online now Make Money
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Bhw :-)
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,100
    Reputation
    2925
    Thanks
    1,246
    Thanked 1,582 Times in 1,025 Posts

    Default

    Hmm. Annoying :-) how will they determine low quality. Maybe low content/page count EMDs? Or EMDs in bad neighbourhoods?

  4. #4
    ferma231's Avatar
    ferma231 is online now Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    1,604
    Reputation
    3578
    Thanks
    1,611
    Thanked 2,836 Times in 785 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Replies are even more Fu**ed

    This just sucks, im sure even white quality websites will get hurt

  5. #5
    Psychobilly1 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    113
    Reputation
    60
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 35 Times in 30 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Funny, if it's low quality why would it be ranking to begin with?

    Sounds like Cunts is admitting the algo sucks...

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Psychobilly1 For This Useful Post:

    asi_av (09-30-2012), dog-tag (09-29-2012), foshizzle (10-04-2012), frasierukraine (09-29-2012), mrtwister_65 (09-29-2012), Sprouts (09-29-2012)

  7. #6
    Sceptre is offline Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Cool Kidz Club
    Posts
    286
    Reputation
    133
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 72 Times in 54 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    This is a tad frightening given what most of my websites are. Though I'm curious how it will identify "low quality." My sites aren't low quality, however they are EMDs

  8. #7
    davids355's Avatar
    davids355 is online now Make Money
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Bhw :-)
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,100
    Reputation
    2925
    Thanks
    1,246
    Thanked 1,582 Times in 1,025 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychobilly1 View Post
    Funny, if it's low quality why would it be ranking to begin with?

    Sounds like Cunts is admitting the algo sucks...
    True. But maybe what he is saying is that if there's a group of low quality sites or even average quality or whatever, EMDs will be dealt with more harshly than non EMDs. So basically they'll take a drop across the board.

  9. #8
    thejake's Avatar
    thejake is online now Retired Blackhat
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Oahu (SOON)
    Posts
    539
    Reputation
    373
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 550 Times in 270 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Farewell, cars.com

  10. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to thejake For This Useful Post:

    AR!ZONA (09-28-2012), bigg_capp (09-29-2012), catwithhat (09-30-2012), frasierukraine (09-29-2012), FuryKyle (09-29-2012), Hermetik (09-29-2012), ipwned (09-28-2012), Sprouts (09-29-2012), t0mmy (09-29-2012), weruncompanies (09-29-2012)

  11. #9
    Pikachoo's Avatar
    Pikachoo is offline Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    139
    Reputation
    85
    Thanks
    105
    Thanked 105 Times in 57 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychobilly1 View Post
    Funny, if it's low quality why would it be ranking to begin with?

    Sounds like Cunts is admitting the algo sucks...
    Give them a chance... they've only had 14 years to figure out this 'search' thing...

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Pikachoo For This Useful Post:

    GutierresSEO (11-15-2012), ipwned (09-28-2012), pooinmyloo (09-28-2012)

  13. #10
    Subsonic's Avatar
    Subsonic is offline Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    DNS root zone database
    Posts
    366
    Reputation
    134
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 319 Times in 138 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    If I have learned something from Google's previous algorithm changes, not even high quality unique content is enough when the algo decides that your site is of low quality. "Innocent" people always get hurt because the Big G doesn't mind a few casualties if they manage to drop some spammy sites from the search results.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Subsonic For This Useful Post:

    pokerjk (09-29-2012)

  15. #11
    chhhad's Avatar
    chhhad is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Under a rock.
    Posts
    188
    Reputation
    21
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    "low quality" is the keyword here (pun intended).

    plus it only affects 0.6% of US results.

    to put that in perspective: if you rounded up 1,000,000 of us with EMDs, only 6,000 people would be affected.

  16. #12
    DrJekyll's Avatar
    DrJekyll is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    1-9 for your Keyword goodluck
    Posts
    831
    Reputation
    55
    Thanks
    189
    Thanked 689 Times in 255 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Well, thats easy just cut the weight they give to the domain and let the other quality factors stand on its own.

    I left over 100 websites go, for the simple fact I have found I can do way better with putting the same content/products on 1 website and leveraging OTHER traffic then what Google wants to give you or take away at a whim, or a algo change goofup.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to DrJekyll For This Useful Post:

    mrtwister_65 (09-29-2012)

  18. #13
    thejake's Avatar
    thejake is online now Retired Blackhat
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Oahu (SOON)
    Posts
    539
    Reputation
    373
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 550 Times in 270 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by chhhad View Post
    "low quality" is the keyword here (pun intended).

    plus it only affects 0.6% of US results.

    to put that in perspective: if you rounded up 1,000,000 of us with EMDs, only 6,000 people would be affected.
    That's pretty facepalm misapplication of statistics even for BHW.

  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to thejake For This Useful Post:

    andee (10-12-2012), ipwned (09-28-2012), nativepro (09-29-2012), richcamp (09-29-2012)

  20. #14
    glew's Avatar
    glew is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    138
    Reputation
    32
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 88 Times in 46 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    No surprise. Actually i'm shocked it took this long.

    Quote Originally Posted by thejake View Post
    Farewell, cars.com
    Cars.com is not going anywhere but,

    linksyswrtg54g-2ghz-broadband-router-on-my-desktop.com is!

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to glew For This Useful Post:

    AR!ZONA (09-28-2012)

  22. #15
    ipwned's Avatar
    ipwned is offline Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Your Dad's Boxers
    Posts
    275
    Reputation
    32
    Thanks
    1,095
    Thanked 100 Times in 67 Posts

    Default

    I'm quite glad about this actually. I see loads of shitty results like this and it is damn well annoying.

  23. #16
    roamer's Avatar
    roamer is offline Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ punoɹɐ ƃuıɯɐoɹ
    Posts
    463
    Reputation
    219
    Thanks
    406
    Thanked 418 Times in 223 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    I have an emd, just like "cars.com" - not as cool, but still a type-in domain - for the purpose of this post, think "yatch.com" (it's kinda related). I've never worried about google even ranking it (but it's been pretty much at the 1st-2nd position forever). I got it about 10 years ago, and it has a 100% related website + content. So people want a yatch (again, not really, but close ), they type my domain + .com. Couldn't care less if googla or the fat guy try to fix whatever is not broken, people will still type my domain, and I believe some of the EMDs are such an obvious choice that many people will still type them just to see if there's a related website.


    "I once worked as a stand-in for Matt Cutts. All I had to do was just stand there with a fake beard over my girly face and look really fat and clueless."

  24. #17
    ryannull is offline Power Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Zombieland, Florida
    Posts
    691
    Reputation
    143
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 272 Times in 169 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Techniquely, brand names are exact match domains.

  25. #18
    pooinmyloo's Avatar
    pooinmyloo is online now Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Welsh Wales, boyo.
    Posts
    267
    Reputation
    155
    Thanks
    115
    Thanked 203 Times in 119 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by glew View Post
    Cars.com is not going anywhere but,

    linksyswrtg54g-2ghz-broadband-router-on-my-desktop.com is!
    Hands up who else copy/pasted that into their browser.

  26. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to pooinmyloo For This Useful Post:

    crazyz (09-28-2012), glew (09-28-2012), Hermetik (09-29-2012), jass11 (09-30-2012), kefoo (09-30-2012), macdonjo3 (09-28-2012), Sprouts (09-29-2012), wezzy (09-28-2012)

  27. #19
    macdonjo3's Avatar
    macdonjo3 is offline Today is a gift.
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,851
    Reputation
    844
    Thanks
    792
    Thanked 2,209 Times in 605 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Found this rumor too.

    Keyword ScoutKeyword Scout Lite Free TrialBacklink MinerDomains For Sale
    Have an amazing product? I'll help you sell hundreds or thousands on Warrior Forum.
    Are you an excellent programmer? I'll make you some money, with a joint venture.

  28. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to macdonjo3 For This Useful Post:

    davids355 (09-29-2012), drywallrob (09-29-2012), frasierukraine (09-29-2012), kefoo (09-30-2012), Pikachoo (09-29-2012), QuiGloriam (09-29-2012), shesdead (09-29-2012), Sprouts (09-29-2012), wpbacklinks (09-29-2012)

  29. #20
    wezzy's Avatar
    wezzy is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    193
    Reputation
    19
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 33 Times in 16 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Yeah they probably will skip the quality check part anyway and just punish any EMD with less than 2500 words of content. They are just targetting mns AGAIN!

    45% of the money I spend on creating a mns goes to content and I'll be furious if I see any of my sites go down the drain just because some fuckhead wants to "improve the internet user's experience with Google".

  30. #21
    Izzma's Avatar
    Izzma is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    114
    Reputation
    29
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 47 Times in 38 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    I swear Google is the biggest hypocrite ever to embrace the internet, what kind of slogan is "Don't Be Evil" anyway???

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to Izzma For This Useful Post:

    ibmethatswhoib (09-29-2012)

  32. #22
    Scripteen's Avatar
    Scripteen is offline Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,684
    Reputation
    604
    Thanks
    422
    Thanked 1,751 Times in 422 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    One of the comments on his tweet that I loved.

    "@mattcutts Do you ever go out and enjoy life? Or do you literally live for Google? Go and have a beer and drop the whole Google thing"

  33. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Scripteen For This Useful Post:

    catwithhat (09-30-2012), davids355 (09-29-2012), dreamcoder28 (09-30-2012), fab (09-29-2012), hotnguyen (09-29-2012), kefoo (09-30-2012), ryannull (09-28-2012), Sprouts (09-29-2012), staycoolmen2006 (09-29-2012), t0mmy (09-29-2012), Winternacht (09-29-2012)

  34. #23
    ryannull is offline Power Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Zombieland, Florida
    Posts
    691
    Reputation
    143
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 272 Times in 169 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by wezzy View Post
    Yeah they probably will skip the quality check part anyway and just punish any EMD with less than 2500 words of content. They are just targetting mns AGAIN!

    45% of the money I spend on creating a mns goes to content and I'll be furious if I see any of my sites go down the drain just because some fuckhead wants to "improve the internet user's experience with Google".
    The only things they are improving are the amount of users forced to use Adwords, their profits and favoritism towards big corporations.

  35. The Following User Says Thank You to ryannull For This Useful Post:

    kefoo (09-30-2012)

  36. #24
    lancis's Avatar
    lancis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Milky Way
    Posts
    864
    Reputation
    443
    Thanks
    96
    Thanked 811 Times in 389 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    It would be wise of Google to replace Cutts' team with someone who has better ideas.
    Because for some reason, once they started playing with my user experience, it continuously goes down.

    By the way I'm not against giving less weight to poor EMD, without that extra weight it will be much easier to rank your website. However, I don't think that Cutts qualifies for the job.

  37. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    20
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Having an EMD isn't a sign of low quality (even if there are tons of low quality sites with EMDs) so this is yet again another move by Google that could punish plenty of reputable websites. Hopefully EMDs with GOOD quality content will not be punished just like good quality affiliate sites shouldn't be.

  38. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RockingLastsForever For This Useful Post:

    gerryboy (09-29-2012), ramdom (09-28-2012)

  39. #26
    accelerator_dd is offline Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    IM Wonderland
    Posts
    998
    Reputation
    310
    Thanks
    344
    Thanked 332 Times in 207 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by glew View Post
    No surprise. Actually i'm shocked it took this long.



    Cars.com is not going anywhere but,

    linksyswrtg54g-2ghz-broadband-router-on-my-desktop.com is!
    Wouldn't it be better to have a 10 page site dedicated to this router series, than to have one page dedicated to it over at routers.com ? 10 pages content is a lot more valuable than 600 words on an authority domain.

    "I Cannot See, have lost 80% of my eyesight... I am no longer able to work full time." -Pete "steelballs" Contribute Now!

  40. #27
    themidiman's Avatar
    themidiman is offline Power Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    root@pts/0
    Posts
    701
    Reputation
    632
    Thanks
    357
    Thanked 1,443 Times in 384 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Translation: "We at Google are completely in over our heads. We have no idea how to keep "spam" off the front page, and this is us grasping at straws."

  41. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to themidiman For This Useful Post:

    davids355 (09-29-2012), DrJekyll (09-29-2012), ibmethatswhoib (09-29-2012), nativepro (09-29-2012)

  42. #28
    ramdom's Avatar
    ramdom is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    125
    Reputation
    3
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 49 Times in 27 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    I hope the #1 site in my niche gets hit. Low quality site with $2 articles while my high quality site struggling at #5.

  43. #29
    bertbaby's Avatar
    bertbaby is offline Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,599
    Reputation
    621
    Thanks
    1,888
    Thanked 909 Times in 635 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    If they had their beak in domain registration you know they would be singing a different tune.

  44. #30
    thejake's Avatar
    thejake is online now Retired Blackhat
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Oahu (SOON)
    Posts
    539
    Reputation
    373
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 550 Times in 270 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by bertbaby View Post
    If they had their beak in domain registration you know they would be singing a different tune.
    http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/domain.html

    wut?

  45. The Following User Says Thank You to thejake For This Useful Post:

    bertbaby (09-29-2012)

  46. #31
    B. Friendly is offline Banned - see signature
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    387
    Reputation
    393
    Thanks
    608
    Thanked 456 Times in 267 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by chhhad View Post
    plus it only affects 0.6% of US results.
    Source?

  47. #32
    ramdom's Avatar
    ramdom is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    125
    Reputation
    3
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 49 Times in 27 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    New exact-match domain (EMD) algo affects 0.6% of English-US queries to a noticeable degree. Unrelated to Panda/Penguin.
    https://twitter.com/mattcutts/status/251789327691042816

    Already checked my niche and my competitor's who was ranking#1 with his low quality EMD got kicked from page 1
    Last edited by ramdom; 09-28-2012 at 11:08 PM.

  48. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    367
    Reputation
    141
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 191 Times in 93 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    another smoke signal take no notice

  49. #34
    jox51's Avatar
    jox51 is offline SEO?... What... Please...
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    ....
    Posts
    183
    Reputation
    39
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 43 Times in 26 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    I wonder how do they rate user experience? They want to improve user experience but in reality, it is their perception of user experience. Do they receive complaints of certain types of website or what? I just don't understand their logical reasoning for having such frequent algo updates. It's like they hang around on SEO/IM forums and see what everyone is doing to earn a living and then they go and target it. Crazyy

  50. The Following User Says Thank You to jox51 For This Useful Post:

    Pikachoo (09-29-2012)

  51. #35
    themidiman's Avatar
    themidiman is offline Power Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    root@pts/0
    Posts
    701
    Reputation
    632
    Thanks
    357
    Thanked 1,443 Times in 384 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by jox51 View Post
    I wonder how do they rate user experience? They want to improve user experience but in reality, it is their perception of user experience.
    They don't. It may have been the case years ago when the serps were packed with shit, but the algo changes of the past couple of years are simply about money. Google is no longer the innovative start-up that they like to brand themselves as. They are a giant corporation with a stranglehold on search, and it's their job to squeeze out every last dime.

  52. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to themidiman For This Useful Post:

    drywallrob (09-29-2012), karupoiss (09-29-2012), wezzy (09-29-2012)

  53. #36
    topdown's Avatar
    topdown is offline Registered Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Fiverr :)
    Posts
    69
    Reputation
    30
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Anyone with 30+ emd's noticing any changes? If so what setup had every domain that got hit (I'm referring to article numbers and type of backlinks)?

  54. #37
    glew's Avatar
    glew is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    138
    Reputation
    32
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 88 Times in 46 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by accelerator_dd View Post
    Wouldn't it be better to have a 10 page site dedicated to this router series, than to have one page dedicated to it over at routers.com ? 10 pages content is a lot more valuable than 600 words on an authority domain.
    To me it depends on your traffic. A 10 page semi-authority site is for "product research". Pros, cons, features and what not are all used to pre-sell. But what if the visitor already knows it's what they want and are just looking for the best price or some discount....they could care less about all that well written content.
    Those are the people I try to build my sites for now. I'm not in the pre-sell business. I find it a waste of time to put effort & resources into a site just for the google numbnuts to get a wild hair push my shit in oblivion!

    You could see it coming a mile away! Which is why I think I only ever had 3 EMD sites ever. Think about it, it gets shared on one forum then on every freakin im forum on the planet! You think they aren't gonna notice? Things like that always go through the same pattern -

    1. Initial Implementation - 1st in makes the most money!
    2. Saturation - Everyone else starts doing it.
    3. It gets killed or roadblocks put in place - ie: Panda, Penguin, this next update.
    4. Finally lose all effectiveness (unless you really know what your doing ).

    As a matter of fact I don't build sites that rely on google for traffic anymore, except for the holiday season. They lay dormant most of the year, getting just a trickle of traffic then they come alive all on their own. I don't care about or even look at their rankings nor do I build backlinks to most of them, if i do it's maybe 1 or 2 at most but, they always get found and they are set and forget. Just the way I like 'em

    You just have to be creative and NOT FOLLOW THE HERD!

  55. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to glew For This Useful Post:

    accelerator_dd (09-29-2012), dreamcoder28 (09-29-2012), frasierukraine (09-29-2012), yogi31286 (09-29-2012)

  56. #38
    ok888 is offline Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,427
    Reputation
    201
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 309 Times in 243 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Bullshit

  57. #39
    nativepro's Avatar
    nativepro is offline Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    527
    Reputation
    274
    Thanks
    156
    Thanked 441 Times in 195 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by Scripteen View Post
    One of the comments on his tweet that I loved.
    Yea, that's a great comment lol. Wonder it that guy's site will get penalized?

  58. #40
    assphuck's Avatar
    assphuck is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    994
    Reputation
    365
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked 607 Times in 300 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Google will not rest until you have to pay through one of their companies to buy food. And if you are misrepresenting your desire to eat, or if you have too many pimples above the fold, you will be penalized with smaller portions or sent to the back of Google's soup line.

  59. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to assphuck For This Useful Post:

    davids355 (09-29-2012), ibmethatswhoib (09-29-2012), reallife (09-29-2012)

  60. #41
    ch8878's Avatar
    ch8878 is offline Elite Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,669
    Reputation
    57
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked 233 Times in 175 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Instead of doing all this kind of stuff why don't they just penalize websites that have misspelled words, improper placement of comas you know real things that make the internet better as a whole.

  61. #42
    bertbaby's Avatar
    bertbaby is offline Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,599
    Reputation
    621
    Thanks
    1,888
    Thanked 909 Times in 635 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    I stand corrected but their domain registration efforts appeared to be based on their partnership with Godaddy. Anyway in researching this I found this nugget that I must have missed on BHW:

    "However, another noteworthy aspect of this update is that Google has partnered with GoDaddy to even cross check the domain life (registration and the expiry date of domain), and apparently Google believes that the domains that are registered for 2-3years are legitimate, while those which are just registered for 1 year may be intended to create door-way pages."

    WTF?

  62. #43
    assphuck's Avatar
    assphuck is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    994
    Reputation
    365
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked 607 Times in 300 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by bertbaby View Post
    I stand corrected but their domain registration efforts appeared to be based on their partnership with Godaddy. Anyway in researching this I found this nugget that I must have missed on BHW:

    "However, another noteworthy aspect of this update is that Google has partnered with GoDaddy to even cross check the domain life (registration and the expiry date of domain), and apparently Google believes that the domains that are registered for 2-3years are legitimate, while those which are just registered for 1 year may be intended to create door-way pages."

    WTF?
    Do you have some sources? I'd love a reason to move domains away from Godaddy.

    Since Google is an accredited registrar (ID #895 as noted here), they do not need to partner with Godaddy to pull registry data.

  63. #44
    reallife's Avatar
    reallife is offline Jr. VIP
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    843
    Reputation
    259
    Thanks
    134
    Thanked 226 Times in 164 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target

    Quote Originally Posted by assphuck View Post
    or if you have too many pimples above the fold

    Classic

  64. #45
    Hermetik's Avatar
    Hermetik is offline Newbies
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    47
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts

    Default Re: Cutt says: Low Quality Exact Match Domains Are Google’s Next Target


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
 Z SEO - Posts on my Personal High Pr Network with up to PR-6 & PR-7 By 35DollarSeo.com


WordAi Ver 2.0

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-16-2011, 01:21 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-16-2010, 10:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  





BlackHatWorld on Twitter BlackHatWorld on FaceBook


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86