If you think Panda is a myth and any old content will do then you clearly don't have any sites of your own and just like to come on forums giving 'advice' about 'life in IM'.
Just because some random guy comes on here telling us that he's getting outranked by someone with 600 dup articles doesn't mean google doesn't care about unique content.
For starters he could be a massive troll. Do you read everything you read in the newspapers? Well what about forums? What about people new to a forum with no posts? He could say some page is ranking for a finance keyword by having the word "finance" keyword stuffed on the page. It wouldn't mean it's true.
Even if it is true. That tells us absolutely nothing we can form a solid conclusion from. You'll rank number 4 for a low competition keyword with dup content. If you extrapolate that google doesn't care about unique content and you can just go and spam everything to make money then you're not very bright.
Even if it is more than a low competition keyword, there are always exceptions to every rule, especially where
SEO is concerned.
It sounds more like you've read a bunch of threads on bhw about how all you have to do is setup a few autoblogs and before you know it you'll be driving about in your ferrari.
Also, I think your "expect your good quality content to get taken someday" is hilarious. Do you really think google doesn't know what a timestamp is?
Regardless of this, I do know how you can duplicate content and rank, but it's not as simple as you make out. There are legitimate times when content is duplicated. For instance newspaper stories spread and it's not always the original publisher that will rank the highest. It's quite possible the site at #4 is aware of the same thing I am and is exploiting it.
rofl, did he seriously just rep himself from his jrvip account? What a dumb move.
Bookmarks