Originally Posted by TeenAngel

Just go to Fiverr and buy a 10,000 XRumer blast for 5 bucks. Better than blowing $500 plus the months it takes you to learn to use it.

alright final question

where do would i start using all the required tools, sb/xrumer , do you target all 30 2.0s and slipt evenly among eachother? this is the only part confusing me.
Pretty much what would i tell the guy at fiverr to blast?

Originally Posted by Bienshen

alright final question

where do would i start using all the required tools, sb/xrumer , do you target all 30 2.0s and slipt evenly among eachother? this is the only part confusing me.
Pretty much what would i tell the guy at fiverr to blast?

You can split evenly, or be random . There's no specific rule here.

Somebody mentioned naming the 2,0 websites something generic so they can be used with other sites. Do you yourself name them the keyword you're after? and do you name all the 20 2.0 exact same thing?

Say your key word was a longtail like : Cheap laminate flooring for sale

All twenty 2.0 would be named "cheap laminate flooring for sale" Content of the article in the 2.0 would be the same as the name of the 2.0? with a contextual link back to your money site ranking for that keyword.

Would you also add other articles for other keywords within them twenty sites? I know you said you have another ten 2.0 that link to inner pages and i assume other keywords, but it seems a waste just to put one article on one 2.0.

Hope I've explained what I mean properly lol.

Great Method.

Not new but better when someone says emphatically, he has Good result to prove it.

However i would like to ask, even before i saw your thread i was using web 2.0 properties and building links to them manually.

A site i started building links to just under 3 weeks got to 2nd page - 15th position for a 200,000+ exact monthly traffic keyword. High competition.

But without warning after a couple of days it fell to 60th. I have been trying to understand what happened, the most credible conclusion i could come to was with the "anchor text".

I was wondering if you use exact matches of anchor text through out the properties you create or do you diversify them?

What exactly are your experience?

Originally Posted by skadster

Somebody mentioned naming the 2,0 websites something generic so they can be used with other sites. Do you yourself name them the keyword you're after? and do you name all the 20 2.0 exact same thing?

Say your key word was a longtail like : Cheap laminate flooring for sale

All twenty 2.0 would be named "cheap laminate flooring for sale" Content of the article in the 2.0 would be the same as the name of the 2.0? with a contextual link back to your money site ranking for that keyword.

Would you also add other articles for other keywords within them twenty sites? I know you said you have another ten 2.0 that link to inner pages and i assume other keywords, but it seems a waste just to put one article on one 2.0.

Hope I've explained what I mean properly lol.

I never use keywords in my web 2 url's - that's one reason they get deleted very quickly.

Random names, all 20 have different names as well. I don't like leaving footprints.

Originally Posted by timchuks87

Great Method.

Not new but better when someone says emphatically, he has Good result to prove it.

However i would like to ask, even before i saw your thread i was using web 2.0 properties and building links to them manually.

A site i started building links to just under 3 weeks got to 2nd page - 15th position for a 200,000+ exact monthly traffic keyword. High competition.

But without warning after a couple of days it fell to 60th. I have been trying to understand what happened, the most credible conclusion i could come to was with the "anchor text".

I was wondering if you use exact matches of anchor text through out the properties you create or do you diversify them?

What exactly are your experience?

Do you mind PM'n me the keyword/site ? I doubt your issue is from link building.

Hi,

Are you using 30 articles on each web 2.0 property (i.e. 600 spun articles)? Or do you just have the one article on each web 2.0 site (20 articles, 1 each on a web 2.0 pointing to direct and 10 articles, 1 each on another set of web 2.0's pointing to inner links)?

Originally Posted by kilauea999

Hi,

Are you using 30 articles on each web 2.0 property (i.e. 600 spun articles)? Or do you just have the one article on each web 2.0 site (20 articles, 1 each on a web 2.0 pointing to direct and 10 articles, 1 each on another set of web 2.0's pointing to inner links)?

1 article each..

Originally Posted by xenix9

1 article each..

Thanks. The other thing that I was foggy on was how many articles to write, but double the competition seems to be a safe amount. I'm in a weird niche where the rank #1 guy only has *4* articles on his site. I challenged myself to outrank him in a few months, so I'm really trying hard.

Originally Posted by kilauea999

Thanks. The other thing that I was foggy on was how many articles to write, but double the competition seems to be a safe amount. I'm in a weird niche where the rank #1 guy only has *4* articles on his site. I challenged myself to outrank him in a few months, so I'm really trying hard.

A few months ? You'll rank in 30 days tops

Nice method, will test it out for sure.

Got a few questions:

1. Have u tried this on keywords in different languages ? and are u using the same method or different one ? What are the difference ?

2. How many 2.0 properties does your link spread to ? 5 links per properties is good enough ?

3. Are u using the same spun articles in AMR blast as in your 2.0 ?

Thanks for the share !

1. Tried Spanish / French / Romanian.

2. 5 is good.

3. No.

Do you think you can draw up a ms paint outline of how you interlinked everything? or are you strictly anchor layer >> money site ?

Originally Posted by Bienshen

Do you think you can draw up a ms paint outline of how you interlinked everything? or are you strictly anchor layer >> money site ?

Pretty sure this is it. File is big, writing is small.

Originally Posted by xenix9

It's already 5 now since I posted the thread - anyhow do you have a better method to share with more than 3 samples ?

See? Now you had to go and get all sensitive on me.

I have been searching the forums without much luck, ao is there a list of solid web 2.0 properties floating around somewhere that I am unable to find? Or, does anyone have a solid method of finding niche specific web 2.0 properties?

Thanks in advance.

There's plenty on BHW . Look around. But I suggest you find ones related to your niche too.


Try this:
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackha...-websites.html

Originally Posted by timchuks87

Great Method.

Not new but better when someone says emphatically, he has Good result to prove it.

However i would like to ask, even before i saw your thread i was using web 2.0 properties and building links to them manually.

A site i started building links to just under 3 weeks got to 2nd page - 15th position for a 200,000+ exact monthly traffic keyword. High competition.

But without warning after a couple of days it fell to 60th. I have been trying to understand what happened, the most credible conclusion i could come to was with the "anchor text".

I was wondering if you use exact matches of anchor text through out the properties you create or do you diversify them?

What exactly are your experience?

Your drop is nothing to do with anchor text. I have sites that I've ran as tests that I have the same anchor text throughout the campaign (except the links that don't allow KW's in the link which is a small proportion). Despite this I still rank top three for medium competition KW's.

Your drop will have been to do with on page factors and one of the many mini Panda updates we have been having.

Originally Posted by PauloPaul

Your drop is nothing to do with anchor text. I have sites that I've ran as tests that I have the same anchor text throughout the campaign (except the links that don't allow KW's in the link which is a small proportion). Despite this I still rank top three for medium competition KW's.

Your drop will have been to do with on page factors and one of the many mini Panda updates we have been having.

I've taken a look at his site - there's no content .

Im going to try this.

Who wants my method on EMD's / ecommerce sites ?

I do. And we all I guess. This method is huge ... It would be great if you share another tips.

Thanks a lot!

PS. I have a question connected with this method which you've already presented. I am from Europe. I am wondering if it is a better idea to find web 2.0 propertities within my country (and language) or I can just use anyone?

Originally Posted by xenix9

Who wants my method on EMD's / ecommerce sites ?

i will try on my new ecommerce site

Originally Posted by tedchang8592

i will try on my new ecommerce site

I'll work on breaking it down into simple understandable steps - and will come and post.

I am from Europe. I am wondering if it is a better idea to find web 2.0 propertities within my country (and language) or I can just use anyone? What do you think about that bro?

Originally Posted by cucma

I am from Europe. I am wondering if it is a better idea to find web 2.0 propertities within my country (and language) or I can just use anyone? What do you think about that bro?

If you want to rank in EU, then use EU web 2 properties. I'd like to share that list as well !

really? I thought that I can use any site from any country but it is good if first link campaign would came from my country. Correct me if am I wrong.

You said that you've used this method for sites outside the US. What were differencies?

Originally Posted by cucma

really? I thought that I can use any site from any country but it is good if first link campaign would came from my country. Correct me if am I wrong.

You said that you've used this method for sites outside the US. What were differencies?

Doesn't matter where the first links come from - but I noticed effects in rankings when links come from where you want to rank (better ranking). Ie, rank in google UK - get links from sites hosted in UK / .co.uk domains.

Originally Posted by Johnlittle

I have been searching the forums without much luck, ao is there a list of solid web 2.0 properties floating around somewhere that I am unable to find? Or, does anyone have a solid method of finding niche specific web 2.0 properties?

Thanks in advance.

Phpbuilt maintains a great list of web 2.0 properties at http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackha...bsites-13.html

and they're split between US and elsewhere as well.

There are some flagged as UK and as I'm trying to rank a uk site going to try to concentrate on those, although not sure if there are enough to get a nice link diversity.

Any other suggestions for uk web 2.0s?

I really don't know why some people send me PM regarding this thread and ask me many questions, this is not my method and i didn't post this here on BHW

Anyway, here is how i see so you will have my view on this thread now:



1. On page SEO + Unique Content ( this is a must)

- You all know about this, put some plugins, make WP optimization, put original content, 500+ words and you are good.


2. Bulk Ping Free Indexer

- After all it's done put your mail URL, and inner pages in some indexer tool, so google can see your blog, and mark your content like yours.


3. Google Webmaster Tools (wait until 50% of site shows in index, then proceed to next step)

- You have to put your link in GWT, so google can track you to see your site is good and to start to trust you. About 50% i think it's clear for all


4. 20x MANUAL Web2.0 Creation to Home Page (Spun Content)

- Take 20 Web 2.0 Properties, like, weebly, blinkweb, webs, onsugar, quizilla etc.. Make 20 article to be unique, (you can take article from ezine articles, and spin it in TBS for example) and post them to 20 different 2.0.


5. 10x MANUAL Web2.0 Creation to Inner pages (Spun Content)

- It is the same here, like for main domain, just take your inner pages except your main URL, and everything else is the same.


For point 4. and 5. i think OP use only one link per one Web 2.0 (not sure in this)


6. 1000 AMR Blast to Web2.0's

- After 2.0 is done, OP takes all 30 links and blast them at once to AMR (with 1000 article directories). How many live links he get after submission i really don't know.

He takes the regular links from Web 2.0, without any anchor text, like "http://www.testest.webs.com" and put in spintax format:

{http://www.testest.webs.com|http://www.testtest.onsugar.com|http://www.testtest.weebly.com} to get all 30 links randomly submitted in AMR.


7. XRUMER AMR URL's

- After AMR is done, OP takes all (live and maybe pending, don't know that also) links and places them in xrumer. I think here is also the same like for Web 2.0.

{[link=http://www.articledirectorie1.com/]KW1[/link]|[link=http://www.articledirectorie2.com/]KW2[/link]|[link=http://www.articledirectories3.com/]KW3[/link]}

to get all, let's say 1000 AMR links into Xrumer.


8. BMD Xrumer AMR URLs

- After Xrumer is done, OP takes all links from AMR and Xrumer and places them to BMD, to get them in social bookmarks.


9. SB Blast > everything with all related keywords as possible.

- I'm not sure, but i think OP put here all links, from Web 2.0, AMR, Xrumer and BMD.


10. Get all the links from ALL layers crawled, starting from the bottom layer.
Use any service, or create your own feed. NO need for drip feeding. You start your ping process from the bottom up.

- At the end, OP says, take only links from Sbox, because if you get them indexed You will automatically get all other links indexed also.


Ok so OP please correct me if i didn't understand something and now guys you all have my views of this method and there is no need any more to sending me PM


Regards

i have been following this thread since 2 hours ago. my eyes feel like it is bleeding but i have learned a lot. i gotta say thanks to OP for this great thread. I havent read a great thread like this in months on BHW.

i will be trying out this method for a EMD that has 18,000 exact match. if my site gets ranked, i will post the results on here. if it reaches 1st then i will be hopping around my room like a 12 year old girl. !!

Originally Posted by xenix9

Doesn't matter where the first links come from - but I noticed effects in rankings when links come from where you want to rank (better ranking). Ie, rank in google UK - get links from sites hosted in UK / .co.uk domains.

What about lower tier links? Should they come from sites hosted in my country or it doesn't matter?

how many xrumer and bmd links do you point at your amr links?

The method is good, should help a lot of people, thanks.

Did I missed this question or no body asked yet? What is the competition for this link building stratagy?

Originally Posted by cucma

What about lower tier links? Should they come from sites hosted in my country or it doesn't matter?

Doesn't matter .

Originally Posted by mellowfellow

how many xrumer and bmd links do you point at your amr links?

As much as I can .

xrumer usually 30k+

Originally Posted by feixia913

Did I missed this question or no body asked yet? What is the competition for this link building stratagy?

This question seems irrelevant.

what do u mean by niche related web 2.0s how can i find or scrape that ?

Originally Posted by xenix9

Here are my steps :

1. On page SEO + Unique Content ( this is a must)

2. Bulk Ping Free Indexer

3. Google Webmaster Tools (wait until 50% of site shows in index, then proceed to next step)

4. 20x MANUAL Web2.0 Creation to Home Page (Spun Content)

5. 10x MANUAL Web2.0 Creation to Inner pages (Spun Content)

6. 1000 AMR Blast to Web2.0's

7. XRUMER AMR URL's

8. BMD Xrumer AMR URLs

9. SB Blast > everything with all related keywords as possible.

10. Get all the links from ALL layers crawled, starting from the bottom layer. Use any service, or create your own feed. NO need for drip feeding. You start your ping process from the bottom up.


enjoy !

Niche related web2 = web2 that has some form of relation to your niche. Ie, you niche is weight loss . Your target customers are mostly women = you find niches related to women. example womenspost.ca

what would be the effect if this is done on an exact match domain with 5k exact global monthly searches ? as u said non emd and iam trying an emd will this have a negative effect as its a emd ?

Originally Posted by asritad

what would be the effect if this is done on an exact match domain with 5k exact global monthly searches ? as u said non emd and iam trying an emd will this have a negative effect as its a emd ?

dosent matter, he just mentioned "non-emd" because it highlights that it is the backlinking doing the work and not the domain name.

an emd would just make things better.

Originally Posted by eternalfrost

dosent matter, he just mentioned "non-emd" because it highlights that it is the backlinking doing the work and not the domain name.

an emd would just make things better.

exactly - EMD will be even easier. I noticed everyone is after EMD's; and it takes pretty much the same amount of time/effort to rank .

This is what I like doing instead of MNS.

brandable_domain.com/exact_match_keyword

Google ranks pages...not domains .

Originally Posted by xenix9

exactly - EMD will be even easier. I noticed everyone is after EMD's; and it takes pretty much the same amount of time/effort to rank .

This is what I like doing instead of MNS.

brandable_domain.com/exact_match_keyword

Google ranks pages...not domains .

I cannot agree with u. An emd of mine with that well known "hello world" post, now is on 3rd-4th pages for 2 weeks.

BTW, competition is medium (or high maybe)

Originally Posted by edgematch

I cannot agree with u. An emd of mine with that well known "hello world" post, now is on 3rd-4th pages for 2 weeks.

BTW, competition is medium (or high maybe)

Question is, how long it will be there - and we are talking about 1st page rankings here.