Should I blast Money Site With AMR?

Dan Da Man

Elite Member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Messages
1,851
Reaction score
939
Just wrote about 100 unique articles which are all on my money site. Now, I am going to use Amr and spin those articles and blast web 2.0s or should I blast money site. Too risky to blast money site??? Each article is based on one keyword.

What is the best method for distributing my articles?
 
I would say definitively blast your buffer/web 2.0 sites. Lately AMR blasts have worked well at first only to kill my rankings later. At first I figured it was a good ole Google jig of sorts but that it has been 3 weeks and my rankings aren't budging.
 
Last edited:
I use AMR and post links directly to my money sites. The key is to put some effort in to spinning your articles and you should be fine.
 
Blasting your second tier sites is definitely your best bet.

Many people have had negative side effects lately with blasting a main site, so unless you are willing to take the risk just skip it for now.
 
I would say definitively blast your buffer/web 2.0 sites. Lately AMR blasts have worked well at first only to kill my rankings later. At first I figured it was a good ole Google jig of sorts but that it has been 3 weeks and my rankings aren't budging.

Hmmm.. So you are saying that it is hurting your money site even though you are blasting your buffer sites?

ALso, is it best to just worry about one keyword at a time. One article for every one keyword for every one web 2.0 post?
 
I have never had any negative effects on my sites using this strategy.

Spin the anchor text and the where the URL the link points too. I point a portion of the links at my money site.

So if I use 3 anchor text variations for each link and each link has 2 or 3 different URL's it might link to. I include a link to my money site as one of the 3 URL's for just one the links in an article.

I also try not to link a spun version of an article to the original on my site (spun article A links to original article B and spun article B links to original article A, etc.)

I think spinning the anchor text and URLs is one of the most important parts of spinning. 1,000 versions of a spun article linking to the same URL with the same anchor text is a little obvious (especially if the page they link to a version of the same article).
 
I would link to money site. But not 100 articles at the time
 
AMR has a scheduler. Just spread the articles out.
 
Do you guys use proxies for AMR?
 
Hmmm.. So you are saying that it is hurting your money site even though you are blasting your buffer sites?

ALso, is it best to just worry about one keyword at a time. One article for every one keyword for every one web 2.0 post?

My fault for sounding confusing, my rankings have been hurt due to blasting my money sites.
 
I wouldn't spin those same articles and blast them anywhere. If they are not indexed yet on your money site it can hurt you. Try to keep money site 100% unique. But definitely you can blast money site. I always blast money site and Web 2.0.
 
Guys unless you are doing serious indexing techniques (like backlink energizer or a service) there's no fucking point using the scheduler since 1. 50% of the article directories on the list aren't indexed and 2. those that are are fucking hard to index.

About 20 or so will index within an hour of say 250-300 livelinks. Now remember to cut that in half due to deindexed directories so you have about 150 (that's being generous more like a hundred generally) indexable links tops and of those you will have to sheer brute force them if you want them indexed.

As to the OP, I blast well spun articles directly. Shit spins to tiers.

Now how much benefit any of this does in terms of ranking these days is another story...
 
Back
Top