If you could pick only 1 - SEO method... what would it be?

So if you could only pick 1 SEO method for your campaign ...
what would you choose & please elaborate on why you chose
your answer.

I thought this input might help every one out.

Option can be black or white hat like:

Scrapebox, Link Push, Article Marketing, Directory submission, XRumor etc

Thanks!

That's total impossible. Anyone who says one method will accomplish anything is lying to you.

.

If i had to do all the work myself, i would probably choose scrapebox becuase its so extremely versatile...however in my experience, Xrumor is the best for quickly ranking sites and being a lazy buzzard, I would probably opt for xrumer if my strategy were to rank sites quickly, and then move on to the next site.

Manual Blog Commenting on high PR sites, lengthy process but produces better rankings than just blasting to any old shite.

Taktical said:

That's total impossible. Anyone who says one method will accomplish anything is lying to you.

.

Click to expand...

Your right Taktical.... let me rephrase the question. What option/s would you give the most weight to or would be your first priority?

Then it would have to be manual link building on high pr sites. No replacing that.



.

Its funny out off all my sites I dont have one EDU or Gov link?
Has any one actually seen their pages jump after getting some of these
links placed... or is it more hype?

Anyways if you havent used this search codes on go-o-gle they work well.
Give it & try and let me know your results. Thanks!

site:.com inurl:blog "post a comment" -"comments closed" -"you must be logged in" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"
site:.org inurl:blog "post a comment" -"comments closed" -"you must be logged in" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"
site:.edu inurl:blog "post a comment" -"comments closed" -"you must be logged in" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"
site:.gov inurl:blog "post a comment" -"comments closed" -"you must be logged in" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"

site:.com "powered by expressionengine" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"
site:.org "powered by expressionengine" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"
site:.edu "powered by expressionengine" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"
site:.gov "powered by expressionengine" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"

site:.com "Powered by BlogEngine.NET"site:.edu inurl:blog "post a comment" -"comments closed" -"you must be logged in" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"
site:.org "Powered by BlogEngine.NET"site:.edu inurl:blog "post a comment" -"comments closed" -"you must be logged in" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"
site:.edu "Powered by BlogEngine.NET"site:.edu inurl:blog "post a comment" -"comments closed" -"you must be logged in" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"
site:.gov "Powered by BlogEngine.NET"site:.edu inurl:blog "post a comment" -"comments closed" -"you must be logged in" "ADD YOUR KEYWORD"

i will do web 2.0 properties and building links on high authority sites.

One that doesn't become obsolete after the next Google update.

It's really not possible. Only 1 method cant make any sense in SEO. When we do SEO we ned traffic from several sources. only a single source traffic cant give enough benefit. I think its not a feasible tactics.

JackSparrow said:

Manual Blog Commenting on high PR sites, lengthy process but produces better rankings than just blasting to any old shite.

Click to expand...

Agree with this!

======================================== same questions different wording.. omg

authority backlinks (blog commenting) - .gov, .edu - built manually - just a couple of these have had huge impacts on some of my micro niche sites, and they tend to stick

HanaleiWest said:

So if you could only pick 1 SEO method for your campaign ...
what would you choose & please elaborate on why you chose
your answer.

I thought this input might help every one out.

Option can be black or white hat like:

Scrapebox, Link Push, Article Marketing, Directory submission, XRumor etc

Thanks!

Click to expand...

I'd pick SPAM, ehehehe :sgrin: irate:

I got an extensive list of footprints I use to find highly relevant blog posts, forum posts or just blogs that support CommentLuv. If I'd have to choose a software, it'd be AMR.