[method] Backlink Watermarking and Naturalization

ExtraWinner

Elite Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
3,478
Hi BHW members!

As promised another insight on todays SEO :)

When I had connection problems I created this thread with hope to be able to post it as soon as my net will allow me again. So here it is:

After some initial testing I come out with 2 new SEO exploits. Those backlink building methods are great way to get huge SERPs kick.



#1 - Backlink Watermarking

This is very simple method. Build backlink (PR5+), point your anchor keyword to Wikipedia, get it crawled, change it to your Money Site, get it crawled again.

Here is more explanations:

Create profile backlink (Angela style backlinks are back in game) and create anchor. Lets say your website is www.ItalianSpaghetti.com, and keyword: Italian Spaghetti.

So create anchor text to Wikipedia to related page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaghetti
with anchor: Italian Spaghetti.




1.png




Ping it with site like: Pingomatic.com or similar.
You can send 5-10 pings over 1 day for best results.
Wait 1 week until it will get crawled (not-indexed do not means not-crawled. Refer to my other SEO thread about SEO insight).
After 1 week login back, and modify url in your Anchor to your own:




2.png




What this will do?

Your backlink have been crawled already and remembered as pointing to high authority website. Now after changing it you will get:

+ for changing content (Google loves changes)
+ for linking to high authority website (even if you changed it already)
+ for natural look (Google still profit backlinks that have been changed, as they seems to be natural - people often change backlinks in their profiles, so Google thinks this link is real one).





#2 - Backlink Naturalization

How Google can easily recognize if your backlinks are fake?
Simply by looking at Anchor ratio. Regular users mostly will use RAW (non-anchor) backlinks to point to their favorite site. So if you have ratio of 99% Anchor backlinks this will send good signal to Google = SLAP.

How we can secure ourselves against this?

Simply get lower ratio of Anchor links, and use much more of non-anchor ones, pointing to main page (to gain authority).

What is Backlink Naturalization? It is a process where we will still push Anchor power through non-anchor backlinks.
To do this we will need to create 6 backlinks in which only 2 will point to money site. Here is simple explanation what we will create:




3.png




How this helps?

Well your main backlinks will get a lot of Anchor power from backlinks to them. Even if they will then go as non-anchor, they will still hold some keyword power, and you will stay under radar from Google.
Create 20-30 of those, and you will get huge jump in SERPs.
This method is really good, especially if you could do this with Xrumer (so you will be able to create thousands of backlinks, and stay under radar easily).




Stay tuned for more.

Also as of my 1.000 post I will release totally free software to BHW for fast backlink indexing. I just need to test it more :)

Don't be afraid to ask questions!

I am the owner of pictures in this thread - you are allowed to use them.


Thanks,

Extra Winner

.
 
Cool man I just love your threads. There are only few guys who do rapid SEO testing and come up with loopholes. You are one among them. Keep up the good work bro. Rep given!

Here is my question ;)

@ #1 --> After changing the link back to our site from Wikipedia. G0ogle crawlers is gonna come and see the changes we made right? So it will report back to their server about the changes made. I believe G0ogle is smart enough to reevaluate the link power after the changes. What is your opinion?
 
Awesome Man :P

But Am not clear wit the Part of Wiki!


Do we Need to Create account their in order to create that anchor link?
 
And here he goes again.... :)

Thanks extrawinner for one more top notch post.

Testing this and hoping for the bests results.

Never thought about the changes before, the 3 "reasons" you claim on your "backlink watermarking" idea seems pretty solid.

Thanks again!
 
I printed it to PDF and put on my iPad to read it again and again :)

I am always using one non-keyword direct-to-URL link
in resource box when I blast with AMR for the same reasons.

Thanks mate.
 
Good stuff, will give this a shot with my site that's been stuck at #4 for months. Thank you.

One question; a ton of xrumer links typically have the URL in the website box as the raw link, then in the signature box it shows the anchored link. Would you then recommend to run these specifically without the anchor links and have the raw link in the sig box for this purpose?

Thanks, excited to give this a shot.. always looking to try out new things.
 
Last edited:

Your backlink have been crawled already and remembered as pointing to high authority website. Now after changing it you will get:

+ for changing content (Google loves changes)
+ for linking to high authority website (even if you changed it already)
+ for natural look (Google still profit backlinks that have been changed, as they seems to be natural - people often change backlinks in their profiles, so Google thinks this link is real one).

Missed this one...what makes you think Google should still love your backlinks if target link changed? Are you suggesting Google doesn't notice that they are no longer linking to an authority site? Even if what you wrote is real, it should be a short/short term method. Just my opinion.
 
Missed this one...what makes you think Google should still love your backlinks if target link changed? Are you suggesting Google doesn't notice that they are no longer linking to an authority site? Even if what you wrote is real, it should be a short/short term method. Just my opinion.

Interested in this as well :)
 
And here he goes again.... :)

Thanks extrawinner for one more top notch post.

Testing this and hoping for the bests results.

Never thought about the changes before, the 3 "reasons" you claim on your "backlink watermarking" idea seems pretty solid.

Thanks again!

Hey easycash,
Hope your gonna offer this as service!
I for one would use it.

Go on, go on!:D
 
Missed this one...what makes you think Google should still love your backlinks if target link changed? Are you suggesting Google doesn't notice that they are no longer linking to an authority site? Even if what you wrote is real, it should be a short/short term method. Just my opinion.

Firstly,
Extrawinner - thanks -this stuff is just magic.

:)
 
Last edited:
bookmarked this thread :D , to bad i need to go college now but will test it for sure :D
 
Excellent brainstorming!

I'm gonna try that out for a client, sound very good. I really appreciate your point-of-view about SEO.
 
Wow this is simply awesome! Extrawinner I always look forward for your threads . Thanks + rep given .
 
Another big one from "The Winner." thanks a lot. Just bookmarked it for further reading. I really need to take my time and download this bit. thanks once again.
 
i don't know why but i Like your posts, almost your SEO thread! Awesome man ;)

Subbed again :cool:
 
I've never thought this kind of links scheme work, but I'll try to prove it. Thank you for sharing your idea! It really sounds good!
 
Thanks ExtraWinner,
Awesome info, some stuff I've not come across before.
I'm just in the process of a trying several linkbuilding methods, I'll certainly be adding this into the mix.
 
Cool man I just love your threads. There are only few guys who do rapid SEO testing and come up with loopholes. You are one among them. Keep up the good work bro. Rep given!

Here is my question ;)

@ #1 --> After changing the link back to our site from Wikipedia. G0ogle crawlers is gonna come and see the changes we made right? So it will report back to their server about the changes made. I believe G0ogle is smart enough to reevaluate the link power after the changes. What is your opinion?

Well there is a glitch. They will not only see that your backlink changed, but your page where backlink is placed will get back-juice (as many times said before - backlinking to high authority websites will give your page good gains).

Awesome Man :P

But Am not clear wit the Part of Wiki!


Do we Need to Create account their in order to create that anchor link?

Create profile with your backlink on High PR website, and point this backlink to Wikipedia related page. I cant explain more clearly.

And here he goes again.... :)

Thanks extrawinner for one more top notch post.

Testing this and hoping for the bests results.

Never thought about the changes before, the 3 "reasons" you claim on your "backlink watermarking" idea seems pretty solid.

Thanks again!

I am glad you like this!

I printed it to PDF and put on my iPad to read it again and again :)

I am always using one non-keyword direct-to-URL link
in resource box when I blast with AMR for the same reasons.

Thanks mate.

Way to go :)

Good stuff, will give this a shot with my site that's been stuck at #4 for months. Thank you.

One question; a ton of xrumer links typically have the URL in the website box as the raw link, then in the signature box it shows the anchored link. Would you then recommend to run these specifically without the anchor links and have the raw link in the sig box for this purpose?

Thanks, excited to give this a shot.. always looking to try out new things.

Yes. Imagine how Google see huge ratio of Anchor texts? When Facebook first showed no one was putting in their signature: Social Network - they were putting: Facebook.com
Even if this is just text link, not clickable - it will greatly increase your chances of staying under radar.
I would like actually see somebody with new website, and great onsite optimization to run 5-10K PR3+ backlinks and see if it will get permanently sandboxed, as this should pretty nice cover your black hat doing.

Missed this one...what makes you think Google should still love your backlinks if target link changed? Are you suggesting Google doesn't notice that they are no longer linking to an authority site? Even if what you wrote is real, it should be a short/short term method. Just my opinion.

Well it is long term option actually.
Everytime I do this it looks like that:

Huge jump to for 1-2 days.
Huge drop for 7-10 days.
Even bigger permanent jump to top positions.

That with just small batch of files.

What I would actually do is add 1-2 articles to Ezine and get them indexed while doing this, so you will deny so much of Google Dance.

Also if you can create like 100 backlinks like that, then expect even better results.

Hey easycash,
Hope your gonna offer this as service!
I for one would use it.

Go on, go on!:D

I got 5 PMs after this thread to do some Backlink Watermarking, so maybe I will do it. I need to think about it.

Firstly,
Extrawinner - thanks -this stuff is just magic.

:)

Thanks mate ;)


Just about this 2 methods. I tested them and they ARE working.

I have done Backlink Watermarking on couple of websites and results are amazing. You need to build 50-100 of them to get good results.

Here is an example:

Jump.gif



This website jumped after adding less than 50 backlinks like that. It took 2 days to get to this positions, then it dropped by 2 times, and then it went to top20. Just on 50 backlinks.


I wont create theories why this is working, but this 2 looks like one of best exploits since Link Wheel.

Keep questions coming,

Bart
 
is there any chance of uncle google finding this out and slap the heck out of us?
I am very careful the way i create back links.
 
Wouldn't leaving 2 links on the profile (one to your money site and one to wikipedia/authority site) have the same effect?

Or are you suggesting that google counts the number of links on a page and knows the specific link that changed from an authority to your money site and sends the back-juice like that?
 
Back
Top