While I have thanked him for his posts, I think Billygood hit the nail on the head here, and I will reiterate the thanks here. A lot of people are looking for a lottery win type of programme. I don't think that is possible. You need to treat such an effort like the business venture that it is. It will take time, effort, and like any business, creativity.
Again, I am truly inspired by this thread, and the other "100 sites by new year" thread too. I have some ideas, I have a few twists I will have, and I will be ready to get started on my effort quite soon. Hopefully by the new year.
Regarding adsense banning, I don't think google will necessarily ban you for having a lot of micro sites. They just need to add value. This is where your content comes in. It has to be good, and actually add value to visitors. Having been doing some article rewriting on DP for others, I can confidently say that 90% of the "keyword optimised" content out there is rubbish. It seems written for machines, and not for humans. Whenever I see a site like that, I hit the back button quicker and harder than Ali ^^^. That is no good, and I can see why google would ban such sites.
Billygood also wrote about using companies. I totally second that route. I had the same idea, and I will be splitting my microsites by genre, with each company holding only one genre. It makes so many things easier. Throw in the fact that you can write off a lot of corporate expenses before tax, and that the corporate tax rate is generally lower than personal income tax, and it really becomes a no brainer.
Plus, I want to go down the microsite route to test the water on specific niches, and the successful ones will eventually get promoted to a reference/destination/'bookmark worthy' supersite.
If the black hatter in you just won't quit, someone else suggested blackhatting your article directories, and only having white hat traffic to your site. Makes some sense. That said, adsense is
(a) not the only ad network
(b) not the only way of monetising your sites (some sites will not make adsense money, but earn in other ways)
You need to be creative, and while not necessarily thinking outside the box (if there is a box), make your site different, and a pleasure to visit.
On a related note, far too many people seem to be obsessed with
(a)
SEO rankings and
(b) Traffic going through their sites
Some of the most profitable properties on the web might not rank too highly on either, but are highly profitable. Taking an extreme example ... online dating. Searching for 'free dating' on google.co.uk. OKCupid and PlentyOfFish spring to mind, but they do not make it to the results for page 1. Search for 'free classifieds', and Gumtree is only on #6. That said, I am sure all those sites make some serious bank every month.
SEO is useful, especially for small sites with no brand, and for new sites. That said, ranking highly on google will not guarantee you will be profitable. As you effort your sites, remember that the reason for having the site is to make mon£y.
Take an example. Keyword "golden widgets for acne". You could SEO it all you want, but if the content reads like it was written for a machine^^, visitors will not stay. If you sacrifice some of that obsessive SEO for an article a human visitor will want to read, you could plug an Amazon book (for commission) on Golden widgets at the end. You might sacrifice some traffic, but the viewers you get will stick around longer, and EARN you more.
some notes::
^^^
If I were google, one of the metrics I would use in deciding spam ranking of sites would be how much time people spent on that site before hitting the back button. Google are in the business of delivering value adding search to their users, and spammy sites that clearly diminish this value would (and should) get nixxed pretty quickly.
^^If you really want to have fun, take up some article rewritting job offers on GaF and the like. The spun or "optimised" articles as they call them are so blatant, and would be totally unappealing to any human visitor. Any reasonably experience internet user soon learns to spot them, and does not stick around.
^^As an example, (and a really nice example. I cannot off the top of my head remember the really atrocious ones. They are really bad) a human written article might write,
"People with acne should consider golden widgets for their ailment"
A (so called) SEO with *ahem* keyword density might read
"People with acne should consider golden widgets for acne, as golden widgets for acne is blah blah blah, and if you have not tried golden widgets for acne, then you really should try golden widgets for acne since golden widgets for acne is the best of all the treatments, beating all non golden widgets for acne treatments."
Bookmarks